Last week I posted a mini-review about a bizarre appointment I had that invloved two dogs and no action. The majority of replies advised that I should submit a review of the experience, although many felt I should take the provider up on her offer of a "make-up" session at a hotel at her expense. Thanks to all for their input and suggestions.

My final decision was to write the review and not seek out the "make-up" session, at the end of the day my hobbying time and opportunities are too infrequent and precious to waste on what was at best to be a 50-50 proposition for a good time.

Yesterday the provider's profile on TER and ads on city source were still in place. I submitted my review (which was essentially my post with some slight modifications) yesterday. The review was rejected as provider has been de-listed from TER and her City Source ad has also been deleted.

Guys I did my best to put the warning out but looks like this one has gone UTR probably only to emerge under a different name.

If she does re-emerge under a different name, then spread the word.  Thanks.

I think you should go ahead and let us know who she was. Who knows she may still be listed on some other sites.

That is one hell of a story.  I think it's only common courtesy for a provider to tell a potential client if she has animals at her in-call, particularly multiple animals.  I scheduled with a provider last year and when she opened the door, I discovered she had six cats!  Number one, I'm allergic to cats but could probably handle being in the same place with one cat for a short time.  But not six cats not to mention that  the litter box stink was incredible!  I told her that there was no way I was going to be able to do the session and bailed.  And no, I didn't leave even a percentage of the donation.

This one is still active.