I recently tried to book a provider and used my TER account as a reference since I have several White List referrals.  The provider came back and said she could not see me because I posted "shaming" reviews.  Now, my impression was that this is a forum for hobbyist and providers alike to partake in this lifestyle safely and for hobbyist to have a way to determine if we wish to pursue a date with a provider and frankly know what we are paying for.  Therefore, I am honest in my review.  For example, I once saw a provider that had serious stretch marks on her stomach that were a bit of a turn off for me.  Her pictures either hid them or they were altered so that they did not show.  I mentioned them in my review so that others could make an informed decision about seeing her.  I did give her a pretty good review on her performance and her attitude and did knock her appearance down a level from what I would have posted had she not had the stretch marks. So my question is, should I not mention those types of details in my review, because they are "body shaming" the provider or are that the type of information we hobbyist are looking for so that we can make informed decisions?  This provider was very upset and frankly got a bit belligerent and personally attacked me because of my honesty in my reviews.  She said those details are not necessary and most hobbyist don't care about that type of information.  She said she didn't want my judgement causing her to get a "bad" review.  Is she right?  I'm willing to acknowledge that I am wrong about what the average consumer on TER is looking for, but I need your help and input.  Thanks!

is the ability to say no to things you do not want to do.

A. Use TER white list as your bonafide and accept the consequences of honest reviews.  

but I would suggest that this gal may have so many rules that she squeezes all the fun out of a situation.

Why not use P411 for references?  That way no connection between your TER handle and reviews vs your P411 ID.  With P411, you can now invite non-member providers to view your info. Yes, P411 costs you but well worth it...your experience as just one example.

Many of the women who left while TER was in hibernation have decided they don't like the "review culture" and that it's demeaning. Some have gone over to SWitter where they share horror stories about how they were treated by TER "slobbiests" and damaged by degrading reviews.
So it doesn't matter if you have written accurate, fair reviews, only that you review here at all. You will basically be DNS'd simply for admitting you review here, at least by this particular group of providers.

Absolutely!

No, I was not aware of that.  Thank you for enlightening me.

I had a LV escort decline to see me because she thought some of my reviews were critical. Over the next year I monitored her reviews and found that she had gained weight, got lazy, and her scores and reviews went downhill. In the end she did me a favor.

The women here seek to use their bodies to make a living but some get upset that we judge their bodies. Tough. As long as you're not being dishonest or purposely cruel, you should call it as you see it. Years ago I saw a lady who had at least 20 pounds more than her pictures suggested.  I mentioned that--in a review where I described her as sweet, cute and a good lay.  Still, she bitched me out until I blocked her number. Her loss.

your "B" method since day one.  I write honest reviews and providers and agencies have no idea who the real person behind CDL is.  When asked for a review, I just tell the provider I don't have time. Let them pout if they want.  Then wait a month or two and write it.  

I haven't checked OP's reviews yet so I don't know what the specific issues might be.
.
For many of us, unfulfilled expectations are a very big problem. Expectations are often based on photos and the physical appearance they prepare us to expect.  
.
Photos: no tattoos (airbrushed out). Upon arrival: a walking tattoo catalog. Even if you have no problem with tats or even LIKE them (to admire, talk about, try to figure out the meaning of ...), for a lot a guys, the "jolt" to their expectation can be a disruptive downer and ruin a session. (NOTE: If her ad or emails said she has tats, you can build your expectations accordingly.)  
.
Photos: long blond hair. Upon arrival: buzz cut with orange dyed fuzz. Same idea.
.
If the review says, "Skinnier than her pictures." or "Gained some weight since her photo shoot." that's a polite helpful update, IMO. If the review says, "Much heavier than her pics, with disgusting rolls of fat." that's kind of rough and can be smoothed down: "... ample love handles ..."

TLDR: It's more her problem than yours - so get over it and find another.
.
For reviewers, the point is to write an objective review to allow others to make informed decisions before they spend hundreds or more to get the fantasy experience they desire. It's really disappointing to a monger who spent a big percentage of his paycheck when he finds he's not turned on by the provider. Is she entitled to his money if she materially misrepresents herself? Sadly, there are very few providers offering a money-back guarantee if you didn't like the service you receive.  Stretch marks are not automatically "ugly" or "unsexy". But they are a real thing and may not be what a particular monger might want.  So when a provider covers them up and gets pissed when she is called out for it she's going to lose credibility and ultimately business.  
.
For providers, the point is to ensure the client is SAFE, free of drama, likely to be happy & hopefully become a welcome regular. Clearly, every provider has an absolute right to refuse to see anyone any time, for any reason.  But if you run a business you wont be very successful without customers. So it's important to attract as many safe, returning customers as you can accommodate.  How to do that is the very essence of the science/art known as advertising.  There are many advertising techniques, but I submit that those which rely on deception (looks, services, rates, attitude, etc.) ultimately fail to work over time. So trying to suppress objective "truth" in reviews by objecting to or punishing reviewers will probably only result in lost business.  
.
Now on to TER's role: TER is not an arbiter of the truthfulness of reviewers, nor are it's reviews an advertising platform for providers. (Though TER does provide a separate area for provider ads.)  Reviewers who exaggerate scores consistently will eventually be called out, as will reviewers who try to "punish" a provider with lies and low scores when  she didn't do something they demanded, but probably was NEVER available.  In fact, many of the threads in the discussion boards revolve around the accuracy of a review and/or a reviewer.  
.
So yes, she was probably unwise to decline to see you. And she was totally within her rights to tell you no for whatever reasons she had - even if she didn't explain all those reasons to you.
.
Life is good.
.
The Cat

What better warning of disappointment do you want?  The provider herself was telling you she's not up to your published standards.  Thank her for saving you from a bad trip!

... there are sides here.

My belief: Providers have the right to screen however they want and to say "No" or refuse to see anyone for any reason or no reason at all.  

Let's be real, it doesn't really "solve" the problem, it merely circumvents it. We all engage in it, but it just speaks to the real problem.  

A good reason to use an alias. Parse your reviews into two; bad reviews under your alias and good reviews under your "real" name. So, you fulfill the role of posting reviews to help your fellow mongers, but protect yourself by only posting good reviews under your searchable name on TER.

You want to see her but she doesn't want to see you...or vice versa.

My post wasn't in regards to her right to choose not to see me.  I agree that providers can screen however the want and choose to see whomever they want.  It can also also a safety issue and I don't expect providers to take appointments when they don't feel safe. I also don't care that she chose not to see me.  I don't take that personally. I'll just see someone else and as others have said, she loses out on the money and it will go to someone else.  I treat the ladies I see with respect. I'm clean, I'm on time, and I don't overstay my welcome.  I was just wondering how others felt about not including details in a review that are not flattering but might help other consumers make more informed decisions as long as they are true.  It appears to me that most of you out there, at least the ones who responded, find it helpful so I won't change my practices.  I know I want honest reviews when I read them because it helps me not get ripped off.  I also didn't realize that such refusals happen to the extent that they do and I've learned a few tricks for avoiding it. Thanks for your opinions.

Wonk, wonk, blah, blah.  Of course.  Don't we all.  

I recall that the newspapers found a way to describe Monica Lewinsky without calling her fat ... "portly pepper pot."
.
And I recall someone calling a woman "stately" which brings to mind someone of the large frame of the Marx Brother's Margaret Dumont.
.
There must be other terms that likewise soften the blow.

This thread is being mentioned in some escort twitter feeds.