According to the following site:

You are also not figuring additional prophylactics people may be using so your 3 to 14 % comment is grossly overstated.

my point is, we need more truth in advertising all the way around.  I may be overstating but I guarantee you providers are understating.  as with most cases, the truth is somewhere between but I personally believe fewer men would take these risks if they thought with the big head.

Of course I agree with need more truthful advertising from the gals. That will always be the case in every business though and not unique to p4p.

is it really in their interest to fully disclose ALL risk?  And, I really would understand if they did not, since for most of them this is not a hobby as it is for the guys.

The guy should assume the worst and prepare for it. I don't rely on the gal to tell me her STD status. I take the proper precautions and so should you.  

I think if I am gonna roll in the hay with someone STD positive it is my business.

at preventing STD's and with all the free time you'd have left in the session you could ask them all your questions . If your that worried about it maybe this is the wrong hobby for you . Nothing is 100% in life except death & taxes . Now I'm off to the free clinic for my penicillin shots

Based on my experience, I don't believe this and will continue to have fun with the fine ladies here... TYVM.

He's bombarding several boards here with his lame posts about condoms and STDs.  He's clearly picked up a few and is upset.

with the amount of P4P happening, there has to be several cases of providers getting knocked by a client.  that is why I did not enter the hobby until I had a vasectomy !!!

I've never seen a provider's ad stating risk statistics, and I have no reason to assume that any significant number of the ladies have degrees in epidemiology or microbiology so I would not rely on their guarantees if offered.  

I posted a thread here a few days ago, but it was pulled because it named names. (Strange, since I was linking to a public site that had the story with the names, but anyway...)

an anti-hobby mission?  If you add up all his/her posts on the various boards, sounds that way to me.

-- Modified on 1/15/2015 10:48:19 AM

That includes links to news stories, blacklists sites, etc. Doesn't matter if it's publicly searchable on google. It is not allowed here. It violates TER rules on "outing."

would they be 86 to 97 percent effective at keeping you away from your keyboard?

Glad you found it and informed everyone. Better to be informed 50 years late than never.

If it was intended for me only, I now know all that. You were nicer in your explanation of the rules, though.

The stop having sex probably should have happened one generation earlier.

-- Modified on 1/16/2015 11:56:46 AM

You commented that it was "strange" that your post was pulled since it linked to a public site. I was explaining it is not "strange" at all, but just TER's king standing rules.
I also saw your original post before it got pulled, and as soon as I saw it, I knew it was going to be pulled.