As described on the web “ Mansplaining is when a man explains something to a woman in a condescending, overconfident, and often inaccurate manner, based on the assumption that she has less knowledge on the topic. It is not merely a man explaining something, but the act of doing so in a patronizing way, which can be unintentional. The term arose from societal gender bias and can occur across different social dynamics, though it most often refers to a man explaining something to a woman”

And no, “mansplaining” as used in the context of the other thread here was not “incendiary” at all.

In that thread, which you chose to bring back up today for some reason, you shared your definition of the term “unicorn.” That’s completely fair as it’s a vague term used in many different contexts, and you explained your interpretation of it. So far, so good.
.
However, when Hehits responded with a different take by giving a broader definition of the word, you immediately accused him of “mansplaining.” His comment had absolutely nothing to do with gender, and he was not attacking you at all...he simply disagreed.
.
Rather than engaging with his point on its own merits, you dismissed it solely because he is a man, turning the discussion into misandry instead of addressing the actual substance of his disagreement.
.
As you may or may not know, I push back on misogyny MANY times here, and in that same spirit, I also call out misandrist language when I see it, as I have done before and as I will do in the future, if it is warranted.  
.
Thanks for allowing me to address this in greater detail. Enjoy your week as well!

when you giggle, please do not shit.
I am NOT into scat play.

I used to take offense to the term hooker. Now I realize it’s a compliment. The ability to hook a man at anytime & anyplace is the true Art of seduction. I’ve never been a street walker, so hooker no longer grinds my gears.  

No it is not incendiary. I think the word has been overused and overapplied to the point that it has started to lose its original meaning. The word is applied whenever a man simply expresses an opinion or has a disagreement, and it just seems like it is used to shut down a conversation. I think it is annoying sometimes, but not insulting or rude.

I'm fairly sure most of us know what mansplaining is. I would never deny it's a thing. Plenty of men are jerks, talk down to women, discredit them, and what have you. There is certainly a place and time where it applies. There are also times where I have seen women use it anytime they don't agree with or like what a man says. There should be no point where it is used simply because we disagree. Disagreeing should be fine and healthy. Dialogue should be okay.

You have managed to offend the two most prominent board simps here.   They both take themselves WAY too seriously.  They are both closet misogynists.  That's why they project and call everyone else misogynists.  If you give BBBJ's and swallow semen, then you have more in common with the second one.  He's the one in tune with female emotions as he explains in detail in this post.  Lol

Literally, no one accused you of that in this thread.

It is often extremely overused and overplayed.

I thought I was at the poultry barn at the State Fair for a moment. With all that is going on in the world, this seems like an awful lot of words in response to the post.

If you’re going to call someone stupid or lowbrow, you should probably learn how to spell the word you're trying to use as a weapon against them. That kind of irony is hall of fame worthy even for you. lol.
.
Now, as for the term “incendiary,” ....yes I used it deliberately, and I stand by it. Bigoted language is by definition incendiary as it is inflammatory, provocative, and intended to stir up hostility or resentment. That’s not just an opinion... that’s its literal meaning.
.
As for “mansplaining,” of course the word isn’t inherently incendiary as it’s context dependent, like most charged language. But in this case, she used it in a way that didn’t even match the definition SHE PROVIDED. There was no condescension, no sexism, no belittling, etc i.e. NONE of the criteria that would make the term appropriate so that is what made it sexist.  
.
If a man had actually been dismissive, sexist, or talked down to her, I would have had her back in a second and I would have called him out on it directly and harshly. And anyone being honest about me knows that, as I do that routinely here.  
.
Let’s just be honest about what happened here...Elle got bizarrely triggered over an entirely innocuous post from Hehits, and instead of responding to his actual points, she took a cheap shot at his gender. In her view, he was wrong because he’s a man...nothing more, nothing less. That is gender bias, and I’ll call out that kind of bigotry just as I call out the misogynistic nonsense that floats around here almost every day.
.
As for this topic ....it’s been beaten so thoroughly that if the horse had nine lives like a cat, it would be on its tenth death by now. lol. Seriously, time to move on peeps. I just did.

Yet again I'm browsing a thread and wondering wtf was the person creating it thinking?

“you shared your definition of the term “unicorn.”“

If netnoy isn't showing up, just cancel everything. lol

She's in my city and I had considered seeing her. Now definately not.

Of course he did. Very typical of him to deny it.

Thanks for the correction. I didn't call anyone stupid or lowbrow. I don't really do personal attacks.

OOOOooooohhh, to be "called out, harshly" by buttsniffer bobby, lol.  

So the story and lies continue.  
Cause I’ve been in your town for quite some time and I don’t believe that I am the criteria that you search for and vice versa. Not all communications and interactions lead to a relation through TER. I’m not for everyone that’s for sure and I’m elated about that. I wouldn’t want to waste time with judgmental peeps when I’ve got so many great ones that do wish to spend time with me. My reviews don’t lie.  
I hope you can find peace in “the let them theory”  
Not everything is for you, about you and people will talk….
Let them….
Xxx
Elle

I like how you're telling everyone else to move on after writing about  dozen paragraphs on this topic. Then you continued to post in the thread after you told us all to move on. Bravo sir! A masterclass! 10/10 no notes!

What do you have to gain at this point?  That is my real question.  Do you need to be right or do you need to make connections?  You aren't going to get both here.

I would clear your screening easily. I have never had an issue screening. And I have never had any ladies complain about my treatment of them during a session. My list of who I am interested in seeing is long, so not sure if/when I would have gotten to you anyway. I was not always in LA, so for good reason you were not on my radar years ago. And TBH, I did not see your ads or recent reviews until the past year. And, I'm what you call an about once a month guy. I'm seeing maybe 12 ladies a year. So it's not like I'm running through all of the good options in LA quickly.

You and I were on to her from the start with her male hatred. Dopes like 420 still Simping for her is laughable. I am sure him and his ilk are happy for siding with her now that she is on full meltdown man hating mode. Oh well...we cant say we didnt warn them.

It was in the original thread you created in General Discussion.  But I understand, comments get missed.

Elle,

Here's Robert complaining that someone else is out-simping him.   Not surprised that Bobby is in full melt-down mode and turns to fellow simp, Heshits, for a reach-around.  Lol

Am guessing you are getting more advertising here from about three or four posters whose main interest is soliciting responses and creating controversy then saying anything intelligent.
Be yourself and proper.

Or the could reply in anger and continue to bump your thread to the top of the page!

...the term is legit depending on context. For example, the perfect example of "mansplaining" was Todd Akin many years back who presumed to know more about rape and how a woman deals with it than an actual woman!  

Sent you a pm you didn't answer it or here.  So I'm guess this was a waste of time

She said send her an email. Yes, you are wasting time if you are not able to follow directions. Good grief.

Wtf are you coming at me?  I asked her to respond so others could also see.  If she's going to advertise an event and not answer questions, I am wasting time.

Wee you really even serious about it? It’s clear that it’s a matter she wishes to discuss privately while you want to discuss it publicly. Maybe you should just agree to disagree?

Why advertise publicly?  She put it out there and didn't answer questions or say contact me here.....

Buddy, stop trying to act like a round head. Every whore that posts anything on this board is advertising. She clearly said to you if you are *that* interested send her an email. No one is attacking you, stop acting like a pink puddle.

Idk why you decided to jump on me here.  But it's not doing you any favors.  

should be aware by now that providers in general will not discuss specifics with potential customers they have not yet seen, and even when they know them, they will only discuss details with you by private communication.  Her request for a private discussion was reasonable. but your request for her to share the information publicly on a fuck board was not.  Even a group event where some people are paying is still illegal in most places and not something most providers want to share details of until you become a trusted member of the group.  

Now that's a reasonable response.  Not an attack like WM.

You've been attacking and piling on Elle Vegas for like a week now in multiple threads. However a very gentle clap back has you crying about being "attacked." Wipe away your crocodile tears, put on your big boy pants and give it a rest. If you play in the pig pen you're gonna get dirty.  Don't dish it out if you can't take it.

Not really.  I said. Hey I asked questions and you never responded so that is sus.

In your first message in this thread you referred to her as a "stuck up pain in the ass." I'll quote it for you below. Oh sure buddy, that's you trying to defuse the situation. You started in with her out of nowhere. Stop acting like a victim.

Even by the lower standards we reserve for you.  She mocked you soundly, and all you have in return is a half-assed attack.  Next time, you should ask for your balls back from whoever has them before you post a comeback.  Just sayin.'

Stop being a snowflake. This is what Scarlett said to you initially

Not sure why you feel like jumping on a bandwagon here.  Really showing that you're a real winner in life there buddy.

There is a true story about a guy meeting a woman at a cocktail party. In a failed attempt to show intellectual prowess, our hero started mansplaining a new book to her.