I suppose it has been a few months beyond three years since two Tampa vixens navigated my Windows 95 Texas Instruments laptop to TBD and told me all about reviews, messages, and a geek named "Big Doggie" who ate massive quantities of fine food, and was "eccentric," but was opening up a whole new world of adult escort communication. The Bill Gates of Escorting, except ....
I won't go there. He had actually settled down near there in Tampa. TBD deserves a great deal of credit for starting up the enterprise of vixen reviews and message boards to protect hobbyists from avaricious, mendacious women & agencies, from fraud and deceit, bait & switch, cash & dash, upselling,and most of all the refusal to taste massive quantities of warm French vanilla. LOL

The aforesaid Tampa vixens of the night just wanted me to post about the fabulous bbjtc skills they had developed at Tampa vixen school. Fair enough. They were very good. Dumb TBD thought they were self posts by the girls! LOL. Limited imagination and anlyticial skills. He probably thinks he's smarter than his lawyers! LOL
Thanks Aimee and Shy Anne. I've recovered from the fluid loss. Hope you are both very well.

Now the time is June 2002, three years, over 1250 nights since then, lots of fine bbjtcs and bbjteokus, lots of nice vixens, most of whom were wonderful to excellent. Dinner out. Midday quickies. Once in a canoe. No STDs. No pregnancies. A fair number of neck braces for me and thee, however. And probably about 350 reviews posted here on TER, or TBD, or HeavenorHell, on Canadian boards, all totally made up out of thin air for fun, fiction, entertainment. LOL Never happened.
I am really a collie dog who can type! Woof Woof!

I've enjoyed the intrigue and challenge of finding new hotties. Unreviewed very talented women who can turn your ears inside out, whom you want to see maybe 20 times before you get the least bit bored. To take on vacation to Bermuda, Belize, Maui, Bora Bora, Easter Island, because they are very nice and great company.
You best remember the young vix you met during her first week, who was almost frightened, afraid of weirdos, unsure of herself, needing tuition money, supporting a young child, just doing this as a summer job she said coyly because it might be fun. You tried to give her a BFE and moral support, as well as a nice slow ravishing to completion, and a severe tongue lashing TC. You remember the names always, and many vixens use the same or similar handles all over the US: Heather - there were seven Heathers, who are required by law to be blonde 5'5"-5'7", always smiling, with pouty lips, long legs, artificially busty, and submissives. Alexis or Monique or Lolita, who must be French Canadian with velvet lips and tongue, soft and insatiable, with the most awesome of wet pouties! The very best young new discoveries here and there from Florida to DC were Chanel, Kirsten, Samantha, Claudia, two Vanessas, Dawn, Camilla, and now there are Catherine and Natalie.
The dilemma is whether and when to review.
I feel the pain of guys who reviewed a wonderful vix who was a great GFE at $200. In two months she was booked solid at $400.
IMHO that is a mistake, especially in the current enormously selfish American market obsessive culture.
I like a middle road. Enjoy the new lady for a few weeks. Then tell two or three of your best pals. After another few weeks, if you are ready to go elsewhere, a review is a proper sendoff.
Reviews of super nice new vixens are indeed sendoffs.
I've been watching a few of those myself lately.
Sendoff reviews simply force you to explore anew and move off.
To me it is fair and reasonable NOT to post a review until you've enjoyed your new discoveries totally and fully.
It is almost like a patent on an invention or new discovery.
The inventor has a right to keep the discovery as a trade secret forever, unless someone else reinvents the subject, which could happen any day. Coca Cola is a trade secret. The chip was patented and licensed worldwide. Vixens are treasures to be enjoyed for a few weeks or months, before disclosure. I would really like to get a patent on ***'s boobs, and ***'s cute little bottom! LOL
The Lost Schlong
Curator, Sex Invention Division
The Vatican, Lower Level


-- Modified on 6/11/2002 8:32:06 PM

After having your fill with the new provider, I think it would be nice if you could share your good fortune with others -- especially those who got taken to the cleaners.

By then, you would have moved to "VIP" status, and I am confident the provider would be appreciative of your kind words on any or all of the review boards.

Just my 2 cents.

After seeing Alex of Miami, I was so blown away I debated on whether or not to submit a review in fear that she'd grow too popular. Irony #1: My fellow hobbyists in their reviews were nowhere near as enthusiastic as I was. Irony #2: My review was rejected for not being specific enough in the juicy details.

Are we supposed to review only the poor performers and keep the gems to ourselves? I say, let's share the good and the bad. I'd prefer see a quality $200 provider boost her rate to $400 if she deserves it, rather than see her leave the business.

I am told that reviews come into TER by the many hundreds, a steady flow of appreciation for the Board and the vixens in most cases. Rejection is therefore inevitable, and often.
At last count I had submitted over 40, with fewer than half posted. BIMBW. It took some persistence and resubmissions to get several of those posted.
Amazingly, the reviews of about six of my very best experiences have been rejected for one reason or the other, even after resubmission. This was even with exceptionally naughty women I had seen three or more times.
I wonder if geography has anything to do with it.
Most of my reviews from a two week vix binge in Victoria-Vancouver were zonked, as were several of real faves in DC.
TER is busy, so I stopped bugging them and learned to post reviews only after I've had enough of a given vix and am ready to move on, but want to show appreciation for several jobs well done. Reviews of my two current ATFs in DC were rejected as inconsistent, or outdated, but I'll put in new ones after I've gone to wetter pastures.
Delayed posting will never hurt a truly talented vixen because word of mouth and a little bit of advertising will keep her successful.

I know that there are many hobbyists on this site (including me) that don't see providers unless they have been reviewed well by several people with good review histories. I am aware that this means I am relying on the scouting of other hobbyists willing to take the risk. I really appreciate their efforts. I don't make enough money to do this as often as I would like, so I want to make sure my $$$$ are well spent. So IMHO anyone willing to take the risk on an unrewiewed provider, who finds a treasure, is totally entitled to be selfish about it for a while. I think the idea of a "sendoff review" is a fair one. Until then, enjoy! A great THANK YOU goes out to all those hobbyists who take the risk of "taking one for the team". Just my thoughts, LR

I have read all the postings associated with this thread - "to post or not to post is the question".

I echo most of the sentiments.  The only other thing I would add to this mix is that there needs to be more consistency in the reviews that are being posted -- specifically, in the following areas:

1.  Provider's Profile:  In the section, Services Provided, should match up with what's being said in the juicy details.

2.  Juicy Details:  The juicy details should provide a detailed encounter of what transpired start to finish.  Reviewers should get a very clear sense of what to expect.

3.  Overall Performance Scoring:  TER has DONE a wonderful job in articulating the rules of how somebody should rate their experience.   It's unfortunate that not all of us adhere to these rules.  There are a number of providers who have been rated with a rating of 8's, 9's, and 10's that simply do not qualify.

Mind you, I am NOT saying that you did not have the time of your life, and that in your books the encounter was an 11!   But, rules are RULES!

Just some food for thought

and say: "I am one hell of a selfish bastard, and I'm willing to tell everyone, even brag about it."  Forget about this sweet young thing needing that money for her kids or school. Forget about the great service she gave me, how she made me feel special instead of just another "john". Give her a review? Help her out? Hell no, she may get busy and make it a little more difficult for me. Oh, she might be legit and appreciate the help and display this appreciation towards me in some way? Naw, too risky, fuck the little bitch..... I'll keep her hidden until I'm ready to move on.   Schlong, you da man!  (Ummmmm, boss, just thought we might mention that you never post reviews and might look like a hypocritical asshole here; good thinking guys, I'll take care of it....... To Schlong: ummmmmm,     NEVERMIND!;  nice going boss, way to cover yourself).

That was uncalled for Purelust, especially to a guy who has posted probably 300 reviews of vixens on several boards, and  never gotten a favor because of it.
I've shared all of my great newbies after 4 or so visits.
They prosper, and take a lot more vacations than I do to Paris, Hawaii, and the Caribbean. Can't seem to find any of your reviews.
The problem I was talking about confronts every guy who runs point and finds some great winners. Yours is the only nasty response I've received.  

-- Modified on 6/12/2002 4:06:56 PM

have been a little over the top with you, but lots of guys really do "want to save her for myself". I couldn't care less about us hobbyists if one does that, but it is hurting the woman who has given us such a great time that pisses me off. She should be helped as much as possible, not "withheld". Hope these 3/4 visits were in a short period of time. Would hate to think she couldn't make last months rent payment because you waited too long. Know I apologized at first, but now rethinking it. Bottom line, you are putting your selfish silly interest (which is probably wrong anyway if you are going to only see her 3/4 times) before helping this lovely woman who you say is such a treasure. Boy, we all need more friends like you. Maybe YOU should rethink YOUR position....."I'm a nice guy and WILL help you, but not just now because it may inconvenience me."

missing the point. Most guys, such as yourself, do not post reviews at all or ever, unless a few are mandatory to gain board access, so you can become a negative pest.
End of conversation.

the point"? The point being that you are patting yourself on the back for doing something that you should be embarrassed about? Delaying your reviews for NO other reason than you want to "hide" the woman for your own selfish reasons; knowing that she is struggling and a review (which you are going to write eventually) would help her now? Yes sir, I guess I missed that point. Why don't you enlighten me as to how this delay is a good thing for the woman. As for being "ill-equipped"....... have used penicillin, lysol, and a brillo pad, and can now report that my equipment is "well" once again. Hate when it gets "ill".

For the record, I personally don't have any problems with delayed reviews...when you think about it, it's kinda petty to blast someone over it. Delaying a review CAN actually benefit the lady in some cases... if she's new to the biz and gets a great review, then she gets swamped and she's ill-prepared then that can put a dent in her rep which will be hard to repair. Another instance, is if the lady wishes to keep a small client base because of other obligations (kids, another job, etc)

Look at it this way if Schlong was willing to run point and discovered a hot new vixen then hey he stuck his neck on the line so whenever he feels like posting is perfectly fine with me because I know he will post eventually.....which brings me to another thing, where are your posts?...True, I don't have any either but I don't post because I try to stick with ladies who have been reviewed- hey its my dollar and I'm gonna make sure I like/know what I'm getting.

Bottom line, lay off.  You call Schlong selfish but honestly why are you blasting him? Is it because you want your go at her? Think about it great provider at a super-low rate, who wouldn't jump all over that?  If you're so concerned about a provider's finances then when you do see her make sure you give her a fat tip at the end, that way I'd be able to sleep at night.
Come on, you make it sound like they're frickin' broke... if a lady sees four guys a week at 250 an hour, by the end of the week she made a cool 1K and that's assuming there's no tips or multi-hour sessions.... that's not bad if you ask me- she's better off than me LOL.
Ultimatly if the lady delivers as promised, word will get out eventually that she's good.
Peace,
D

I would not hesitate to review, once I have a reviewable encounter.  In the past few months while I have been participating in this board, I have not had any encounters.  As explained in previous posts, I have done most of my Hobbying overseas for the last decade.  To make matters worse, I have been unable to find anyone attractive enough, and with good enough reviews, near where I reside to end the drought.

However, this appalling dearth is about to cease.  I'm spending the next weekend (22nd & 23rd) in San Francisco on the first leg of my latest 'round the world trip.  (Hopefully, around the world in more ways than one.)  The last stop, in about a month's time, will be Oase Burholtzhausen, just north of Frankfurt.  (Paradise on Earth.)  Then, at the end of July, I'll be in Toronto for a while.

I believe it is our responsibility to help our fellow punters, the risks of bad encounters being so very high, and the chances of reviews in Entertainment Weekly being pretty bleak.  Every time I post without that blue link appearing at the top of my messages, I get a twinge of guilt.  Wish me luck on my trip.  Barring the unforseen, I'll be able to start contributing in a more substantial manner.

Soc.

Universe had a schlong, or your own sister suffered a lifetime of suffering from such genetic confusion, there might be better understanding. I see you have no reviews and no PM and I wonder how much comprehension of the big issues in life beyond moronic ballgames. EOM.

A third gender? That's a new one.

Anyway, gee you sound a little defensive. No need to get into the whole social stigma of gender confusion with me.

It was just a QUESTION. I was just WONDERING. No slur to you at all so not sure why you gave me attitude back.

-- Modified on 6/14/2002 7:34:30 AM

and you are eventually going to review her anyway, to wait is selfish. Can I be any clearer?????