... not married, and even though I'll be 68 soon, I think I would date multiple (older) escorts.  Not for "free" sex ("free" sex is the most expensive.)   I was just reading another escort lament on Twitter how she travelled alone for vacation because she can't find a reliable boyfriend.  And as many of us get older, both women and men, we tend less and less to want to get tangled up in another committed relationship.  But we still want occasional companionship of the opposite sex.  I wouldn't rule out dating civies that way, but I just feel between civies and pros, the civies would be more likely to want to lock down exclusivity.  I feel pros might be more free spirited that way.  But maybe not.  It's a fantasy anyway, since it appears I'll be married until one of us dies.

Thanks to you all who want to complicate this thing to the nth degree. It's really quite simple. Have fun. Be cool. Observe simply rules and boundaries. It just occurred to me that I've wasted far too many hours in this forum.

the time you spend her wasted militates strongly in favor of leaving.  Can't fault you for that.

It most likely will be you.  80% of obituaries of men end with . . . . . "He was survived by his wife."    

They want to.

Getting a heart attack while being with a hooker....Now there's a 8 clap for ya...lol
PS-Look him up

when he had a seizure (I don't know if he was married or not) so she called 911 and waited with him for the ambulance. A few years later we were al at a M&G together and she was introducing him around as "Stroke Guy."

I wasn't really commenting on whether pros have fewer significant others than civies.  I was just saying that pros might be more free spirited about non-exclusive dating.  
.
Also I'd be dating women closer to my century.  Not the 23 year olds.  The older ones are more likely to be divorced or widowed.

I wasn't talking about HAVING an SO, but rather, what type of relationship it is.

Oh well, it was a fantasy anyway.