Sorry Mikey, I couldn't resist, and I doubt that I will be the only one. lol

a fate worse than death-------LOL !

I watch porn so theirs nothing in a review that's grossed me out yet.

But i prefer my Ladies to be kinky , some guys prefer "classy". I like em Kinky

Alright, here goes. Is there someone you wanted to see, but won't see them after you found out who they've been with? Or what they've done?

I mean, is there something that disgusts you? Or someone you can't tolerate? And knowing that the person that you initially wanted to see, turned you off cuz of who they saw or what they did?

I know I have. Sucks, too, cuz I really liked these ladies. Some I've already seen, but won't repeat because of said acts. Just repulses me.

I guess it's a hazard of the review process. But I, for one, am glad it's out there. It would make me stop so I didn't do anything I didn't want to do or be with someone because I believe their choices are fucked up.

Yeah, I know. This coming from a drunk mother fucker. But I still pay, and I do have standards.

Flame on!

-- Modified on 3/27/2011 5:07:53 AM

Nah, but I'm totally aware the path this might take.

Sometimes you just have to do, or say, what you think is right. Even if you're alone in your convictions.

Thanks, BTW.

The only way I care is when I've fallen in love.  The green goblin takes over ...

A lady impressed me very much in a variety of ways ... and then I read some of her reviews and was so grossed out I couldn't imagine kissing her even if she paid me.

Sucks.

Look, this is entirely legitimate. Lots of girls refuse to see guys for, for example, seeing TS providers.

We all have a right to our choices, but that also means that if our choices gross someone out, it can affect our opportunities.

Like JohnGalt said, which, btw, I knew HE of all people would know what I'm fucking talking about.

You have certain expectations of certain people. Yes, in the hobby, too. At least when you get to know them to a degree. Then they go off and do something you wouldn't approve of, or condone. And proud they did it. So you get disgusted, and cut off ties to them.

I dig kinky ladies. I've had my ass beat by a couple of women. They took turns. Seen them seperately. also.

But just like every date is unique, so is every lady. And when one disappoints you, it's time to move on.

We as providers can see whom EVER we want... You knew getting into this we see who we want..when we want..and do what we want.... Can you imagine what you didn't know BEFORE you saw certain girls...we don't ALWAYS get reviews...We do not know who you guys have been with..This is a HOBBY!

If you want a girlfriend that you can tell what to do then maybe you shouldn't be seeing escorts. Get a girlfriend.

I know exactly who you are refering you..and I hold her to the highest regard...She's a class act thru and thru. Now you on the other hand..this post is BULLSHIT

When it comes to providers, even though they may do things with other clients in which I wouldn't personally participate; it isn't something that adversely affects my opinion of them in most cases.

For example, I'd never personally participate in a gang bang. Not my cup of tea. The very idea grosses me out to no end. Yet, the lady I'm seeing in April has advertisements on her site for her participation in a very highly rated multiple-sex-partner experience. As far as I am concerned, as long as she doesn't try to abduct me at gunpoint and make me participate; the fact that *she* participates is of no real concern to me and doesn't affect my enjoyment of her company one-on-one.

As far as other sorts of kink go; with the exception of a provider or two who have booked me specifically for certain kinks that I can serve; I tend to reserve these for civie women. Providers get a pretty vanilla version of me. Yet, the fact that other hobbyists may participate in them with a given provider is not generally problematic for me.

HOWEVER -- we all draw various lines. Or, at least, those of us who are psychologically healthy do.

Would you schedule a date with a provider if you knew that less than an hour before 4 guys had shat in her mouth? If you knew she had a transmissible viral STD? If you knew that even though there was no financial necessity to do so, she accommodated the business of a hobbyist you both knew for a fact was a multiple-offender child molester?

In addition, in many respects I do not draw strong lines between providers and civie women; and hence hold providers to the same standards as I would a civie woman in many respects. You can tell a LOT about a person by his/her choices concerning sex partners. Granted, you can tell a bit less when money is involved; but money doesn't make the issue disappear.

There ARE lines. You and I may differ as to where they are drawn specifically, but somewhere, in any healthy person, there is a line where you'll say: "No way will I touch this woman."

Because I guarantee that you don't know what woman I am referencing as I'm referring to something 18 months ago outside of your area.

Furthermore, I am answering his GENERAL idea -- not anything specific.

If you have a specific beef with MP67 -- bring it up with him -- he's a big boy.

If you have a beef with ME -- which I cannot imagine why you would -- that's fine.

You, as an escort, draw lines about who you will and won't see; and nobody has a right to question that. There are escorts that refuse to see clients under or over certain ages (age discrimination), the refuse to see men of certain races (racial discrimination), they refuse to see hobbyists who have previously seen TS providers (sexual orientation discrimination), etc. etc. etc. ad nauseam.

And you, as a woman, have an absolute right to do that. You can exclude a hobbyist for any reason whatsoever because it is YOUR body, and nobody has a right to override that choice.

Well, guess what? Dominion over one's own body is not solely a female matter. Men have that same right and dominion. And we have the right to exclude an escort for any reason whatsoever, including that we don't like the way she spells her name. And you have no more right to question the man's choices, than he has to question yours.

And BOTH have a right to exclude others based upon their other choices. You have NO default right to put your hands on my body except under terms and conditions that are solely within my domain to extend.

Fair enough?

Meanwhile, I think your beef is with MP67. If it is -- feel free to take it up with him -- I'm not privy to the specifics.

But I know exactly who he is refering too..and this situation is MUCH more then this...He's acting like a psycho who has the right to tell this provider what a horrible person she is for seeing who she saw. It's BULLSHIT.

I agree we all have the right to decide whom to see..I sometimes see a gentleman has seen a provider who I do not think is very classy or clean..I don't see him..I also do not come WHINE and BITCH to the board about it.

This hobby is here for variety. NOT for MP to act like he has control over a certain provider!

You can see whomever you want to see, when you want to see them, and where. Same applies for us.

And we also have the choice of NOT seeing you or your friend anymore. Simple.

Now, by you posting to my thread, and your proximity, and who you are referring to that you hold in the highest regard, it doesn't take a brain surgeon to realize who we're talking about.

I'll admit. She's a class act alright. Just thought more of her, is all. That's my fault.

But like I told her, which I'm sure you're privy to, assuming you were there in the bar when she and I talked briefly, I'm glad I got there before he did.

Just saying. Some people do things that other's don't, or can't, appreciate.

So, you make a choice. I made mine. I'm sure your friend made her's also, and I fully expect the ramifications of that.

Aubrey Jo, I never met you. Probably never will, especially under these circumstances. But I appreciate your loyalty to your friend. It's commendable, and I would do the same for others I have high regard for.

The thing is, you don't know everything.

Now, I'll let the 'psycho' label go because I understand you're heated. You don't know me from Adam. And might actually like me if we had talked under different circumstances.

We all know why we're here. And I'm more than certain your friend would admit that I appreciate the ladies just as much, if not more, than most guys here. After all, you don't develop a friendship spanning many months with a psycho, right?

So, she did something I thought was wrong. Doesn't mean she's a bad person. It's just, in my mind, I won't be able to continue to see her in the fashion that we had met under.

That's it. I told her, heatedly, I admit, and of course regrettably. But I can't undo what I said, just like she can't undo what she did that made me come to this conclusion. I'll miss her, and you of all people know why.

And I really think you should  read it again, too.  He didn't out anybody.  He even referred to providers in the plural.  You figured it out because of some private circumstances that should have remained private.  I understand your being upset, but please recognise that any further "outing" resulted from your reaction to  MP's post.  Personally, I'm such a slut that I don't thing anything short of a donkey show would stop me from seeing someone, but that's just me.
My suggestion is that, if something like this comes up in the future, you should PM the person instead of having it  out on a very public board.  Just a thought.

Putting it here is BULLSHIT. He's done nothing but verbaly abuse her since last night..and then did this. I had every right to post on here..since he publicly posted it.

LOL.  Had AJ not responded, I would have had no idea what MP is talking about.  But just by reading the exchange between MP and AJ, I now know exactly who and what we're talking about.  Kind of ironic, isn't it?

Learning to think before you talk is a valuable skill.  Some of us learn it, some of us don't.

I'm a loyal friend and will always take up for providers I consider friends..whether people agree or not.  MP was out of line..I know it..and he knows it. Period

And I'm not saying she shouldn't have posted and protected her friend, just that it  could have been done via PM and thus avoided you and others figuring everything out.  Personally, I have no idea who the person was and don't care.

I've asked that the thread be taken down. Surprised it hasn't yet. I've, we've picked on the ladies enough. They don't deserve it and I'm sorry I started the whole thing.

Just big enough to admit I was wrong the way I go about certain things. Learn the hard way, and hope I don't do it again.

No one put a gun to my head to make me do or say stupid shit, just like no one put a gun to your shit-smelling face to read my shit. Comprende?