Responding to your claim of female-to-male and one way only. Women, these days, seem to think that gentlemanly chivalry means that they can do whatever the hell the want. Fuck them and their suitcase full of make-up.

A while back an ATF attempted to play me by changing her rates three times in a single month. I asked about grandfathering and she replied that I knew "she was worth it". I blew her off. For a couple of weeks she repeatedly called me to ask when I was coming to see her. I stated I wasn't. She became irrate and told me to fuck myself. I changed my number(the wife actually)which served to displace her for awhile. She became familiar with TER and discovered that I had fallen ill. Somehow she came by my new number. While I was recuperating in the hospital the wife manned the fun-phone. She normally doesn't answer it but will share texting with a select few(you luck--ee...luck--ee bastards). She received an odd call from PA. Thinking it may be someone she knew she answered the phone only to be confronted by my former ATF. My former ATF frankly stated that she hoped her "Fucking husband dies".

So does no mean no ladies?

I had a similar problem recently as the hotel/motels in a area that I normally see someone were all booked or very expensive.

So we met an hour away and I got a nice 3 star on Priceline for about $50 like I normally do.

I can't blame any hobbyist who wants to keep his home sacrosanct.

No means no.  How many times do we hear women parroting this phrase?  Yet bitches seem to consider it gender-specific and female-to-male, one-way only.  Well, piss on that shit!   Last night, I called a provider I’d seen on an in-call basis a year ago with the hopes to renew acquaintance, but she informed that she could only do outcall.  Now, the wife’s away, so there was at least the possibility of this, but I found I shouldn’t have even mentioned it.  Beyond the fact that meeting at my home or office throws away every effort at discretion such as hobby-phones and discrete g-mail addresses, having a liaison at my home, matrimonial bed and all, is just a bit distasteful to me.   Also, where I live and during the in-season, it’s quite difficult to quickly get a room for a reasonable price.  It would likely have cost more than the requested donation, or I would have considered that option.  After the initial phone call, a series of TMs ensued trying to get me to change my mind and meet with her at my home.  Believe me, I was tempted but ultimately resisted.  This has happened at least twice before with providers that I had seen before and to a lesser degree with a couple that I hadn’t.  I can kind of forgive it as just an example of heavy-handed salesmanship, but it occurred to me how some women would look at it if the situation was reversed.

Personally, if I were a dude I would only do incall. Your home is your palace and since you don't really know the provider then why take the chance. Of course this goes both ways but I prefer that my clients come to me where I can control the environment; meaning that if he gets outta line I've got something real special for him. Holla!

I respect when a guy says no, and also expect to be respected when I say no.  I never try to pressure guys into seeing me... some guys want me to give them a call and let them know when I'm available, I usually tell them I prefer they call me when they are ready because I don't want them to feel like I am bugging them.

Also, at OSP - I do not have a suitcase full of makeup, I actually wear very little make up

And PanAm's story is legitimately annoying, while OSP's is horrendous.  When shit like that happens to me, I remind myself that the punishment for the person in question is to remain trapped in their angry, shitty life.
As to "no means no," I always thought it referred to when a woman said "no" to performing a sexual act.  That's quite a bit up the scale of importance from "no I  don't want to see you tonight." It goes to the physical power gap between men and women.  What is the equivalent situation for a man to be put in by a woman?  Blackmail, turning him in to LE (or his wife)?  I don't really know.  But for the woman, being unable to say "no" to sex results in rape.

That is how they make a living.  Made the mistake of giving a hooker want to be my hobby number she would blow it up, even when I told her do not call me, I will call her. When I finally called to set it up it was a nightmare of texting had to call to get it squared away for the next morning then she sleeps through the appointment.   But that does not stop her from texting about once a week that she has a bill due.  Ya right. No thanks does not stop it. Finally told her that she is getting bad reviews and I am not interested unless she starts getting better ones.  My loss she says.  But that has stopped the texts at least for now.  Others, I have told to let me know when they hit town and it will be a single message no pressure or repeats. No should mean No for both parties.

-- Modified on 7/28/2011 9:47:19 PM

Very rarely do I ever call clients unless they have contacted me 1st. I would be too horrified to harm a client or his family. There really is a respect level that I believe you must follow. Now I have sent out texts during the daytime 2 times within the past 3 years stating that it was my Birthday month and all of my regular clients could have 25. off any visit during that month, the 1 person that asked me to take him off my texting list was taken off within seconds.  Both clients and providers can seriously harm each other... why even take the chance of pissing off the wrong person? Be sweet, be happy, have respect, and for the love of humanity... follow the golden rule!!!

U call someone u have seen year ago on in-call basis and she didn't have an in-call to accomadate the King and u mention ur home as possible place, which u say u shouldn't have. So, how is this the providers issue & no means No?

Really, u appear to think u are god's gift to women. I read ur post twice, don't see wtf is ur problem.

The word you're searching for is YOU.  3 tiny little letters.  TER doesn't charge by the word.  Feel free to bloviate.

You are stuck in the 17th century. No reason to explain ice to a Grasshopper.

I had one provider who would text me all the time to come see she. One time she was even so bold to ask me to pay her cell phone bill. YEAH RIGHT!

Well it had gotten so bad, that I changed my cell phone, and now I use a track phone, that I change the number to every two weeks or so.

You have the same in civvie realtionships also. The time to cut-off is at the start, not after encouraging them for a while.

But at leased I didn't use "u're".