The ad and pictures read, "Hot young DD breasted latina". What I encountered was, well lets just say it was false advertising>>>>>>>>>  

He or she, obviously were lax in regard to performing due diligence before booking the provider.

I have walked on numerous occasions. and if I walk, I don't leave one red cent as a "cancellation fee" I don't reward bad behavior and any john that does is doing us all a disservice and is part of the problem.

Her pics were obviously out of date and severely retouched, and she lied about her age to the tune of at least 15 years...

Does that mean you don't read provider's profiles and reviews, because "reviewers were too chickenshit to tell the truth?"  If that's the case, what's the point of reviews?

one time i arrived at a girls house ...  totally misled on looks .. heavy and old ... she greeting me and then had me wait while she went into bathroom to freshen up ..  i walked out while she did.    imagine her surprise when she got out .. or i bet i wasnt the first!  LOL  

I've actually heard guys say that certain ladies probably only blur their photos to trick guys into seeing them, because (in their opinion) no one would see them if they showed their faces.   That is just plain fucking mean.  It really is.  

If an escort uses false advertising to lure guys in hoping they'll be weak enough to stay and pay, you can't simply say it's all his fault for not doing his homework well.
Clearly he did not, but that does NOT absolve her for trying to perpetrate a fraud.  Your refusal to say one word about her deception is bizarre.

8's and up only.....

But then realized she had a full length mirror facing the door.

Especially when a prostitute doesn't show her face.  Johns are paying good money to fuck, presumably, a decent looking woman.

seven years old. She was obviously older than her photos, and much heavier. The difference between the real her and the photos was night and day. She had a double chin.  

I've had amazing tunes with butt ugly men.  

Instead of putting up another correcting the first.
I like your pix.

Thank you I know I can but then that takes away the original reply, and I didn't feel like waiting lol

You bring up a good point: there are wayyyyy too many reviewers writing phony reviews.  
They seem to be pandering for attention/affection from a provider rather than posting an honest observation.  
And TER makes some terms ambiguous: what the hell is "a few" tattoos? And "average" body type is all over the board.

...I try to do my research as best I can and choose women with solid track records in terms of reviews and up to date photos. Yes I know that some reviewers will lie or "bend the truth" about her appearance, and some providers post outdated pics.....but so far (knock on wood) I have been delighted and enthralled by all of my dates.

A couple of times I should have.  
But to be honest I just couldn't imagine being that unkind to anyone.  
I know, I know, sounds lame but I never walked in her shoes

Some guys here have been tempted to book by a lovely photo of a young, slim, pretty thing only to go to the booking and have the door opened by a 55 year old, size 16 ugly mama. If it was me I'd run like the wind but a couple of guys I've asked said they were too scared to leave!!!

She saw the look on my face and said.."this isnt going to happen is it".  And she is still here. I have no idea how.

AMEN, girl!  

Meet and Greets don't work well everywhere.  The Twin Cities are relatively small, and it's too easy for LE to infiltrate that sort of event.

Yes, and I've walked out because the provider was an obvious TS / TV, whatever —i.e., not what I bargained for or ever would.  "Not that there's anything wrong with that," right

..the “customer is always right,” means anything at all to you? But I’m certain it can always be argued against the customer always being right, as in the case of beauty based on opinion and not 100% fact. So what’s the default to who is justified in going forward or not going forward and walking out? Who is righteous and who is not righteous, particularly when it comes to the gray areas between butt ugly, beauty and deceit?

Your time here has obviously done you a lot of good. Congratulations for owning a pair. Other guys could take lessons from you.

But that will still be hurtful.  I'm not saying you should stay and play if you're that repulsed.  Just be aware that this is a human being with feelings.  Do unto others...... and all that!

If she's ugly but looks like her pix, that's not her problem.  If she's using fake or deceptive pix, that IS her problem and she has no beef if he walks.  We are talking here about truth in advertising.
If I book a hotel room based on fake pix, but when I get there it's a dump, I'm walking.

My taste in men and women is very specific.  Wonder if this is true with you as well or if you like a variety.

Well I do like variety, but I tend to always seek out tall (at least my height, which is 5'7"), long haired brunettes with athletic builds. But I have been known to take a voluptuously curvy short blonde to VIP at a stripclub. And that rare ginger can be kryptonite to me.

I'm a softball player  lover.  You know the type right?   Pretty but kind of masculine.  Drives me wild!

..but I know I cannot control the thinking and actions of others (however unfortunate it is to be treated unfairly through no-shows amounting to no-income). I also understand that others have the right to disagree here on the boards. Beyond the butt ugly put-down, I can relate to the strong reasons to justify actions in walking away and not going forward, like a straight shooter like Gag; pointing out blatant deceit in advertising (what you see is not what you get), but also some adjustment to going forward, like the flexibility of a Mr. Fisher; pointing out that minor differences are acceptable. However, beyond the above (if I wasn’t clear in my previous reply), I do not identify with an irrational reason or no reason at all for walking out except there is nothing you or I can do about it. (Some may say blacklist that person, post something on the board, but how effective or worth the effort is questionable?) I can only think that individual sees things differently and has the right to accept criticism or reject it. (That person is in charge of his or her own thoughts.) However, as far as disrespecting the golden rule, “do unto others..,” to counter that, call it karma or "what goes around comes around," especially where disrespectful behavior put out sooner or later comes back to the offender. So, perhaps the safest deterrent (although not a guarantee) is a P411, along with other verification sites, and the TER reviews that can lead to success.