This is just life altering.

a pissy little hooker getting riled up over HER poor performance and the subsequent honest review. lol

Shit happens...

I have no idea what this means in the confusing world of Review Approval.  I wrote a review of my ATF almost exactly a month ago.  It was not approved because the link to her  ad/profile on P411 required a password.  OK, I understand.  So I tried a link to her profile on Date-Check.  No dice.  I gave up.  Then, yesterday, because I mentioned her orgasmic qualities in a thread below, someone inquired about her.  So I went back on her TER profile and noticed two new reviews with a link to her P411 profile.  What the fuck, thinks I?  So, last night, I cut and pasted the link into my Unapproved review and re-submit it.  This morning, lo and behold, the review was approved.  Why?  Who knows.  There's no rhyme or reason to it and I think the review mods just like to keep things mysterious by being totally unpredictable or inscrutable.  If anyone has a better explanation I'd love to hear it.

Sounds like you played with your keyboard longer than you played with your ATF. Was it worth it? Just askin.


Just an old , ugly fat fuck with a question.

Sooo nice to hear from one of the Hiroginettes!  At least your papa has the balls to post under his own name.  Back under the bridge, little fella.

Sorry, Stogie, but you are incorrect.  The review condenses three sessions totaling about 5 hours.  I may be semi-literate but it hardly took that long to write the review.
Just sayin'.

one of my reviews was denied for saying nice things and not the ole dirty stuff.

I mean, the more hobbyists post, the better it is for all of us, right?
I've had inexplicable problems with postings, as well, and it's frustrating.  There shouldn't be a problem with someone airing these experiences.  Hopefully, it will filter down and enhance overall quality control.

I have been wrong many times, never knew asking a question could be wrong,except the one that begins, will you marry me?.....but I digress. Glad that the time encompassed 5 hours. I guess after the number of years "here" it is a well worn topic of fact that getting reviews approved is a hassle. I see some that are, in my fucked up opinion, not worth reading and then have personally posted some that were returned for lack of information. Maybe I am holding water today and read what I believed to be another redundant post regarding a tired subject. So inic, if my post disturbed you I humbly appologize.

My last posted review was approved and then a day later disapproved, because I suspect the provider complained about the low score. Anyway, I went from 15 days credit to -14 days credit. Negative days! A subsequent review that got approved yielded zero days. So I've sitting at -14 for all this time.

More wierdness.  You'd think someone with more than 100 reviews would get some slack.

Like my reviews of Angel and Eve and Sheree, to name a few published reviews in the past, I've since had others of that caliber but I'm not submitting them for free. I work hard at getting my freak on.

No problem, Stogie.  It seemed a bit snide, but I can deal with that and it's no biggie, especially on a board like this! LOL.  I realized after I posted this as a new thread that there was one just like it on the same page.  I really should have posted it there, so sorry  about that.

OK, I just noticed my review total had gone down by one.  So I checked and found one that had been up and approved for at least two weeks but was now unapproved because it was "unverifyable."  Now, I don't really care because the gal I'd reviewed asked me to remove it because the numbers (7/7) werent' high enough for her.  She was nice so I tried to help her, but the review mods told me the review was now the "property" of TER and could not be removed at my request.  I let her know this, so I can only guess that she made her case directly to them.  No big deal, but it does indicate more than a little double standard.  BTW, all I said that was negative was that despite her being really sweet, nice and pretty, I didn't feel any real chemistry and I went out of my way to point out that no doubt others would have a great time with her.  To me, all this goes directly to the credibility (as in lack of) in TER's reviews.  Having said that, I've still been able to use them to guide me in the right direction.

I have very few problems, and when I do encounter a glitch, it does not get to me.  The key is to press submit and do a quick prayer as your review travels the internet.  Then reinforce the prayer later in the day, like at bedtime, referencing the previous prayer.  That will snowball it right into the review approvers lap.  A surefire approval will follow.  It has worked for me 7 times now.

I have been asked by several providers to post a review. Ihate doing it. I have one under review now. It is extremely rare for me to submit a review because of the bullshit invooved.

I will add only that, despite the silliness,  I don't really think it's that big a deal.  I mean, it takes me maybe a half hour to write a review and then, at worst, a little follow up to see if it goes through or to fix whatever needs fixing to get it approved.  So, yes, the process is weird and murky, but it's not exactly torture.  Seems to me we have an obligation to make it work as best we can in return for the work others have done to submit good reviews we can rely on.

I have submitted seven reviews. Three have been accepted three not approved and one is pending. I don't go back and try to get the old ones changed. If a discount from a provider was involved I would try and make it work. I still think the process is flawed and there would be more honest reviews if the process was changed.

Agreed.  I only went back to get the  last one approved because it was my  ATF and I just happened to check her review site here and saw recent reviews.  So all I did was cut and paste the ad site info from one of them into my unapproved review,  which worked.  Not much work at all.

As you said it takes 30 min or so to write, and usually less than that to fix any errors.

I get a bit frustrated when the person reviewing it seems to miss the point of my comment to them.

Not a big deal really, but still an irritant.