After talking to several male friends from work about whether they prefer natural or augmented breasts, I was surprised to find out that many, perhaps half, do not like fake breasts.  Given my own preference for implants, and the fact that most high-end providers, and porn-stars, seem to have big implants nowadays, I was shocked to find this out.  There is nothing on a woman like a beautiful set of huge implants to get my blood pumping.  So, I pose this question on a greater scale, to all my fellow hobbyists at TER: which do you prefer?

I prefer full breasts (C or D), not droopy, sensitive, responsive and not too firm, on mature women.  Well-done implantsn usually fit the bill, but I wouldn't be unhappy with a natural women who fit this description.  Alas, I've not found one yet.

John

I don't care for 'large' implants. However I don't completely rule out implants. A size change of one or even two cup sizes is not necessarily a bad thing, as long as it is proportional to her build. When there is a large change, the breasts are usually so stretched that they are hard and unnatural.

Minor changes are usually more for the woman's confidence than for any true physical change. Sometimes they are correcting imbalances or losses from weight loss or pregnancy.

Porn stars are like all models are expected to emphasize there physicality. The men are expected to be exceedingly masculine and the women supremely feminine. Female porn stars as a rule demonstrate all the physical characteristics that our society portrays as VERY feminine. They have big hair, long nails, wear dresses or skirts, all shoes have heels and usually tall ones.

Being fairly normal , I prefer my porn stars with tight bodies and big tits. Women that I meet in real life I expect to be more rounded and have soft natural breasts. I respect any woman that tries to excell to the feminine ideal role, but don't expect everyone to try. Hell if all the women want to look like Baywatch cupcakes it is fine with me, just as long as no one expects me to get in shape to put my fat ass in a thong!

Au naturale is the only way to go for me.

Some will disagree with this, but I think for most guys there's a lot more involved than sheer magnitude.  From an appearance standpoint, shape, texture and proportion play a big role, and the importance of "big" is way overstated.  

When I read your question, I thought about my favorite providers and pondered the appearance of their beautiful bosoms.  There are MANY other things that make a favorite, but it's interesting what each of their breasts have in common:  First, they're all real, and all but one is "light C" or less.  Second, and here's the important part, is that they all involve their breasts heavily in the session.

One (C+/D-) is a Russian fan, and she's very good at it.  One (B+/C-) makes it a point to rub me a lot "down there" with her breasts early on, and often encourages me (quite verbally) to let her finish me by hand on them.  When I'm all done, she makes quite a production of slowly rubbing the results all over them, and is quite insitant that I watch.  The smallest one (A+/B-) craves affection there, and is very assertive, almost pushy, about making sure they find my mouth often.  One (C) is lactating, and makes that a big part of the session if you're into that sort of thing.  (I am.)

To make a long story short, it's not so much appearance for me as it is application.  I'm not as concerned about whether they're big or not, just whether or not we're both getting the most out of them we can.

My vote goes for natural breasts... as I mentioned in a previous thread my pet peve is large, rock hard "Bolt on" titties!

Natural all the way

Although this debate appears periodically, the one issue that seems to get overlooked within the discussion is that bearing children can sometimes have a highly negative effect on what may have previously been a great pair.  In view of that, getting augmentation may be a way to help repair what Mother Nature has not been as kind to through child bearing.  After all, just looking through the reviews and the recent best breast contest indicates that what Mother Nature may leave behind isn't what people seem to desire.  The men in the reviews are rather harsh when it comes to rating breast appearance to make so much noise about natural over augmented.

As my nick suggests I prefer small breasts to large anyway, but most implants I see on TV or in the, er, "movies" look like balloons stuck on a body rather than breasts.

I would certainly be less inclined to see a provider with implants than one without.

-- Modified on 3/3/2003 12:16:55 PM

I may be in the minority but I prefer a well done boob job.I don`t have to have them big, just well rounded.

Natural. I've seen too many badly done boob jobs that look like rocks were bolted onto the woman's chest.

I, too love a big fake bust on MY taste in women and have even considered some myself......but hands down, my
business would drop drastically! Almost 100% of my
clients ask if they can expect naturals. Now I'll pose the question.....

eom

I prefer flat to fake

NATURAL.. No Two Ways About It. I Don't Deal With Unreal-- EOM

If a provider has implants, it's one strike against them. Although large and real is ideal, I would take flat and real over big and fake anyday.

Give me real ones any day!  I don't care if they're big or small, as long as they are factory original equipment.  Nothing ruins it for me faster than breasts that are too hard, immobile and unresponsive.

definitely real!

I have had a few experiences of enhanced breasts on non-professionals, and a few more with providers. In one case, she did look better, not bigger, and they felt soft. The rest of them, I just did not care for.

I always screen for no implants here.

You do have a point about the destructive ability of mother nature and augmentation may be the answer. However polls and reviews are not the best source of advice when it comes to implants. Remember polls are a very small sampling of the population and generally reflect the views of a vocal minority. Reviews are even worse as most are dressed up or down to meet the requirements of the the storage facility and boost a clients ego. Remembernatural is beautiful

i rather c droops, sags than succumb to deception.

The size of the breast is secondary to its intangibles: are they responsive, does kissing and sucking them properly make the lady twitch and wiggle, do the nipples get erect, and so on.  Their visual beauty to me is in more their shape and texture much more than their size.  And then again, generally, the more I like the woman, the prettier her breasts, but that's just me.

I tend to be a pragmatist. Natural breasts are GREAT but they are VERY vulnerable to the affects of age and gravity. Surgically enhanced breasts seem to snicker at nature and look terrific in everything from lingerie to a potato sack.  
  TWO SCOOPS PLEASE!