TER General Board

Releasing my Book about Prostiitution
UnnamedOne 6011 reads
posted
1 / 63

Yes, another major doxxing and outing by a provider. This time, a "top" provider.

Here is the full outing/doxxing:

https://twitter.com/AmyTaylorNYC/status/1694187045290164570

In contrast, here is what she says on her site:

"Amy Taylor values discretion and protects anyone’s private and confidential information at all times. "

We cannot let these horrible women out men at will; trust is the glue that holds this thing together, and this is a horrible violation of trust.

Up for 8 hours, and not a single vote of dissent from other providers. Tacit approval? Silence is approval?
Ladies you need to get your shit together and call out your fellow providers who so egregiously breach trust.

We cannot let them do this with impunity; they must pay a price or this will get worse.

I ask you to:

Report her to tryst as a doxxer and danger to her community. the link is below:

https://app.tryst.link/reports/new?profile_id=3d9495a0-1f12-40d6-b51d-647078c6866b

Include a link to the doxxing in your report.

2) Report her profile to X/Twitter for being a danger to others.

3) Report her to OnlyFans for using their platform to solicit prostitution: @AmyTaylor

4) Find every site she uses (on her Tryst profile) and report her for using their platform for solicitation of prostitution.

We need to respond to doxxers and make them feel it in their pocketbook.

eastside70 42 Reviews 70 reads
posted
2 / 63

delete his booking form response and block him. No one would have been the wiser. Yet she chose to be a dangerous provider and expose his RWI on X for likes, rt's and sympathy/comic relief.  

Another reason to not give RWI to ANY provider.

Platelet 62 reads
posted
3 / 63

Honestly funny replies, but she should have definitely blocked out his info. A provider left a veiled threat to doxx me if I didn't leave her a good review, and it still scares me enough to not post it. Seeing things like this happen continually erodes my trust in the whole screening process.

QueenBia See my TER Reviews 57 reads
posted
4 / 63
cks175 44 Reviews 76 reads
posted
5 / 63
LilKattsMeow See my TER Reviews 62 reads
posted
6 / 63

Just wondering how many providers give clients the same info they request? Just wondering

QueenBia See my TER Reviews 60 reads
posted
7 / 63

I’m an honest provider with integrity who seeks lifetime friends with benefits, so I have no problem sharing my information with a serious gentleman who is transferring funds in large quantities. 🗣️

I am sure not many people are doing this, but I have never wanted to be like everyone else. When I started requiring deposits to book way back in 2010 that was frowned upon & now look at how many working women require deposits. 👀  

We are all not the same, so no need to compare us. I love being unique!

-- Modified on 8/24/2023 5:17:05 AM

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 65 reads
posted
8 / 63

they are honest, have integrity, and are looking for long-term regulars . . . . . until a customer does something to piss them off.  I'm sure there is a threshold at which you would consider doxing someone as well, but it may be much higher than the low trigger points some ladies have been shown to have, so trying to apply a one-size-fits-all policy to everyone is a fool's errand, and with these kinds of experiences being reported almost weekly here, it's probably happening a lot more than we even know of.  Just as you have every right to claim that you would protect a customer's privacy, a customer has a right to protect his own privacy, and if that's a deal-breaker, then he will be spending his money with someone else. Since I have no idea where the trigger point is to get doxed with ANY particular provider, I will always choose to err on the side of caution and rely only on references from ladies who know me.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 43 reads
posted
9 / 63

"I accidentally liked your post.  Unfortunately for me I can’t take it back."

 
This seems petty of you.  You gave him a "like" by accident.  So what?  It's not like he can cash it in somehow.  It's always amusing to see providers' real personalities come out the more they post here.  It's amazing how some put on the fake persona of caring about customers, but there is a "mean girl" lurking inside.  Lol

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 41 reads
posted
10 / 63

It could have been taken more than one way.  Now that you have explained now you intended it to read, disregard my post.  

-- Modified on 8/24/2023 8:30:22 PM

UnnamedOne 99 reads
posted
12 / 63

If she supports what Amy did, will she do the same to others?

UnnamedOne 105 reads
posted
13 / 63
UnnamedOne 89 reads
posted
14 / 63
UnnamedOne 63 reads
posted
15 / 63
UnnamedOne 71 reads
posted
16 / 63


END OF MESSAGE

UnnamedOne 73 reads
posted
17 / 63


END OF MESSAGE

sdottaylor 19 Reviews 79 reads
posted
18 / 63

I'm not saying she's right but aren't you told NOT TO bring up sex until you have been screened?

Plus you did threaten to call the police on her.

Kikiloverkink See my TER Reviews 75 reads
posted
19 / 63

Just to be clear I don’t support doxing clients until it’s really serious then it would be a conversation with people in real life not the internet. I commented on her tweet doesn’t mean I would do that.. I don’t entertain time wasters, just block and move on.

UnnamedOne 67 reads
posted
20 / 63

at the expense of the guy who was doxxed. If you knew it was wrong, why comment in support of Ms. Taylor? Did you report the tweet to X? Did you tell Ms Taylor the doxxing was wrong? Did you ask her to take down the tweet?

You did not do the doxxing, but you supported it tacitly and explicitly. You are complicit in this man's ongoing outing.  

Doxxing ruins lives. It costs divorce, loss of privilege to see children, loss of friends and family, loss of respect in the work community and even loss of job/career in some cases. Some guys who are doxxed receive death threats, as do other members of their families. Many of these are irrevocable and permanent effects. Doxxing is not being "told on"; it ruins lives.

AnarchistCatOwner 60 Reviews 59 reads
posted
21 / 63

She said that this guy actually called the police, not just threatened to. It wasn’t in the main thread but she mentioned it a couple of times. If that’s how it got to that point, can you blame her?

UnnamedOne 61 reads
posted
22 / 63

Has anyone but me even bothered to report it and try to save this guy whatever additional pain he may receive?

Kikiloverkink See my TER Reviews 68 reads
posted
23 / 63

I’m not saying it’s right, but he should’ve thought about all of that before sending her all those nasty messages.

Golden_hampster 69 reads
posted
24 / 63

while i wouldn't of handled it the way she did, he brought up calling the cops!

That crossed the line.

AnarchistCatOwner 60 Reviews 68 reads
posted
25 / 63
Golden_hampster 64 reads
posted
26 / 63

conveniently left out he threaten to sick the police on her when all she did was cut and paste her into to him.

Golden_hampster 56 reads
posted
27 / 63

For condoning : not only threatening a provider with calling the cops, but actually calling the cops on them for no reason.

1angelinajones See my TER Reviews 93 reads
posted
28 / 63

Whilst  perusing  twitter,  X,  (whatever  the  site's   moniker  is  these  days),  
prompted  by  the  "0P"  @UnnamedOne's   justified  statement  and  links  
regarding  said  Escort's  shenanigans,  I  then  scrolled  through  much  of  her  
Profile  timeline  thereupon.

 
It  appears  she  regularly  "doxxes"  anyone  whom  sends  her  "time-wasting"  
requests  and  subsequent  vulgar  communications.

 
It's  a  commonality  most  Providers   experience  in  this  realm,  resulting  in
some  unsavory  characters  seeping  out  of  the  woodwork.
I  guess  it  just  comes  with  the  "cons"  of  this  industry.  (literally  and  figuratively)

 
Sure,  I  get  miffed  when  I  view  them.  
Some  raunchy  verbiage  truly  make  my  "virgin  eyes"  appalled!  lol

 
However,  one  needs  a  thick  skin  to  evolve,  therefore  elevate  in  this  industry.
Thus,  I  "block"  those  that  come  at  me  with,  what  apparently,  she  deems-fit  
for  an  "outing",  on  a  public  forum.  

 
0ne  might  ponder  her  "outing"  adventures  of  late,,,  is  that  she's   creating  a  
"media  ruse"  to  accelerate  her  0Fans  and  business  in  general,  whereby  the  
notion  "ANY"  publicity  is   "G00D"  publicity?

I  tend  to  think  so,  as  she's  supposedly  employed  for  her  "day-job",  at  an  
"Internet/Media"  Company  in  New  York.

 
What  say  you?

Angelina  Jones
Posted By: UnnamedOne

Yes, another major doxxing and outing by a provider. This time, a "top" provider.  
   
 Here is the full outing/doxxing:  
   
 https://twitter.com/AmyTaylorNYC/status/1694187045290164570  
   
 In contrast, here is what she says on her site:  
   
 "Amy Taylor values discretion and protects anyone’s private and confidential information at all times. "  
   
 We cannot let these horrible women out men at will; trust is the glue that holds this thing together, and this is a horrible violation of trust.  
   
 Up for 8 hours, and not a single vote of dissent from other providers. Tacit approval? Silence is approval?  
 Ladies you need to get your shit together and call out your fellow providers who so egregiously breach trust.  
   
 We cannot let them do this with impunity; they must pay a price or this will get worse.  
   
 I ask you to:  
   
 Report her to tryst as a doxxer and danger to her community. the link is below:  
   
 https://app.tryst.link/reports/new?profile_id=3d9495a0-1f12-40d6-b51d-647078c6866b  
   
 Include a link to the doxxing in your report.  
   
 2) Report her profile to X/Twitter for being a danger to others.  
   
 3) Report her to OnlyFans for using their platform to solicit prostitution: @AmyTaylor  
   
 4) Find every site she uses (on her Tryst profile) and report her for using their platform for solicitation of prostitution.  
   
 We need to respond to doxxers and make them feel it in their pocketbook.

UnnamedOne 65 reads
posted
29 / 63

so she is definitely habitual in her maliciousness.

UnnamedOne 99 reads
posted
30 / 63

with 4 doxxings on her timeline in the last few weeks. She does it out of maliciousness, and is deliberately disproportionate to the minor insult.

UnnamedOne 79 reads
posted
31 / 63

Seems you condone any punishment for any crime. You cops blather is bullshit.

BigBoyPants 5 Reviews 59 reads
posted
32 / 63

Let me see if I read this correctly.

You’re not saying it is right, but it is right?

sdottaylor 19 Reviews 109 reads
posted
33 / 63

If you actually look at the screenshots on her timeline, she doxxess idiots. Why are you asking us to stand up for idiots?  

 
Again, not saying I agree with her response but if you don't act like an idiot, you're not gonna get doxxed.  

 
In conclusion, I don't care, I'm not reporting her, don't be an idiot.

 

PS - If a woman asks for occupation, company name and work number, I assume we're incompatible and don't reach out for an appointment

UnnamedOne 59 reads
posted
34 / 63

over the past two years for Amy. She's prolifically malicious.

-- Modified on 8/26/2023 5:35:56 AM

UnnamedOne 58 reads
posted
35 / 63

that you support Amy's little doxxing adventure.  

Why not do it with your real handle? Let everyone know what you stand for.

Everyone can then judge your own trustworthiness and discretion based upon their own interpretation of all of the facts and your own representations.

UnnamedOne 61 reads
posted
36 / 63

the dude is both stupid and nasty.  

Still, the doxxing is uncalled for.

UnnamedOne 60 reads
posted
37 / 63

for more than 2 years. It is a hollow threat, and Amy certainly knew this. This was purely personal antagonism and malice aforethought.  

 
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/21/nyregion/manhattan-to-stop-prosecuting-prostitution.html

 
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/manhattan-stops-prosecuting-prostitution-1158879/

Golden_hampster 65 reads
posted
38 / 63

You come on here slamming all these women for doxxing, most instances I totally agree with you. While I wouldn’t handle Amy’s situation the way she did, he did threaten to call the cops on her I would’ve definitely blacklisted him. I have never posted anybody’s personal information on a public forum before.

But what makes you funny is that you’ll come on this board and slam each of these women but yet you are super friendly  with them on Twitter. So does that make you?

Golden_hampster 59 reads
posted
39 / 63

As long as they are in jurisdictions that don’t prosecute?  

Wow. You’re one sick fuck.

Hpygolky 214 Reviews 57 reads
posted
40 / 63

Both come off like jerks are kinda doing the same thing.

usd2binsfv 65 reads
posted
41 / 63

A provider friend who had been around since the 00's had told me Amy Taylor was the provider who had the gun pulled on by the crazed earlier proprietor of TER about twenty years ago. So I'm sure some oldtimers here remember this infamous anecdote from back then. And that Amy Taylor used to be one of the top ter ranked ter and high-est end provider ladies since back in the mid 00's. As mentioned, plenty had since moved off of TER but still have ad sites on the flavor trend sites of recent years such as tryst.link , taken over the defunct cityvibe, or also on the twitter-sphere part of the hobby advertising now. My take is that her doxxing behavior is so unprofessional and unbecoming of a former top ranked provider. I had also noticed some of the top regional or nationally ranked TER providers had also been infected by today's woked and entitlement social engineered culture.  

It used to be trusted that providers would delete personal information obtained after using it for screening purposes. Now it's like a client can't trust any provider including the 'premiere' agencies anymore of keeping to their written site word of deleting personal and RW information, with too many of these unprofessional 'retaliation' or other screwup examples. And of course the a-hole client of this thread's example could have been just blocked or ignored instead of Amy just responding with her cut'and'paste paragraph.

RegencyHobbyist 109 Reviews 59 reads
posted
42 / 63

I used to follow Amy on social media until I saw her regularly complaining about guys, and doxxing guys who she thought were time wasters. Mind you, she hadn’t even met these guys, she just didn’t like that they wouldn’t comply with her strict screening process through her website. She regularly posted their texts on Twitter and Instagram, sometimes blacking out their contact information, other times including their names and contact information.  
.
About this same time I realized that all of the pictures she posted on social media were stock photos of resort destinations, private jets, and other scenes meant to impress. The one thing that was missing from all of the pictures: Amy. She was never in the pictures because she wasn’t there. She simply posted generic pictures to imply that she lived a luxurious lifestyle. It’s a practice I’ve seen from a few high profile providers trying to give off the illusion that they live a jet-setting high profile lifestyle as a way to justify their exorbitant prices. In reality it’s usually bullsh*t.
.
Eventually I stopped following Amy a few years ago. Doesn’t surprise me what she did to this hobbyist because she’s been doing it for years. In my opinion she’s a provider to avoid like the plague. Overpriced and dangerous.  
.
I agree with the prevailing sentiment in this thread: doxxing is only acceptable where a hobbyist has physically abused a provider or has stealthed a provider. Anything else is easily remedied by blocking or privately blacklisting a hobbyist who a provider considers a time waster or who sends inappropriate messages or whose company a provider doesn’t enjoy.

UnnamedOne 60 reads
posted
43 / 63

unless there is physical harm, sexual assault or robbery  - the worst types of things. In my view, this was not one of those situations.  

You can make up all of the imaginary situations you want - this doxxing was undeserved and wrong.

UnnamedOne 67 reads
posted
44 / 63

doxxing was unnecessary.  A block or even a blacklist would suffice, and never be mentioned by me.  

As for being friendly, yes, I am. Why would I not be?  

After a malicious doxxing, not so much.

cks175 44 Reviews 61 reads
posted
45 / 63

He threatened to call the cops. Dumb move on his part, but doesn’t justify the doxxing.

Hpygolky 214 Reviews 62 reads
posted
46 / 63

I recall, late 90's early 2000''s I reached out to her, yes she's been around since then. I was transitioning from stripper world to escort world. I recall her tag was 400 then. When we spoke I found her to be very cordial and somewhat business like. We talked to get a feel for each other and she came to conclusion that maybe we weren't a good fit. At that time I was ok with it and I could sense that she was right. My playful nature most likely turned her off and I think she was looking more for a whale then some guppy like me. But she was cool and in after thought, she was probably right.
But as time went on, I recall some drama involving her. So now, I can guess that she's more of a no nonsense kinda chick...and time has probably taken it's toll on her.

1angelinajones See my TER Reviews 69 reads
posted
47 / 63

@RegencyHobbyist
Sir,  You  took  the  words  out  of  my  mouth  precisely,  when  I  perused  "X"  to  investigate  this  
thread,  and  to  latterly  comment  on  escort  "AT"!

(Click  to  glean  my  mostly  unread  observations  regarding  this   "doxxing  thread"):
https://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/she-has-a-history-of-doxxing-it-appears-1012302?page=1

I  find  her  "X"  profile  and  postings  likened  to  a  slick  "Publicity  Package".  
A  well-planned  media  marketing  campaign  is  what  I  deduce,  which  entirely  makes  sense  
since  she  supposedly  is  employed  within  the  Media/Internet  Marketing  Industry,  for  her  "day-job".

She  has  "premium"  ad  space  on  every  escort  site  in  the  industry.
With  said  connections,  she  either  secures  it  at  a  huge  "media discount",  or  receives  it  gratis.

I'm  not  mad  at  her  nor  envious  of  her  connections  procured  to  promote  her  "escort  services".

However,  I  am  angry  at  her  "outing"  of  personal  information,  as  I  see  this  as  a  dangerous  trend  
subsequently  used  by  her  adoring  "escort  friends"  which  could  generate  an  overall  breach  within  
the  industry.    
(The  infamous  "Ashley  Madison"  breach  and  subsequent  Covid  did  enough  damage  already
  ... please...stop!)

Angelina  Jones

anony3274931 95 reads
posted
48 / 63

Stuff like this just makes me avoid her and the cackling hens supporting her. I’m sure the feeling is mutual .

Golden_hampster 65 reads
posted
49 / 63

and anyone that calls the police for no REASON deserves to be doxed.

The OP left this detail out because he gets burned by women all the time and as a personal grudge against SW's.

Golden_hampster 64 reads
posted
50 / 63

But now that we all know you think this is a normal behavior, I would suggest YOU be blocked and blacklisted.

I can't believe you actually thing it's cool to call 50 on a woman (even if it's not prosecuted in the ladies home base).

Novagentleman 63 reads
posted
51 / 63

I sincerely appreciate this post. Too often when the lady is an asshole, everyone rushes to take her side. I certainly don't want to meet anyone who thinks doxing is okay. Block the guy and move on.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 58 reads
posted
52 / 63

So let me get this straight.

 
You agree doxxing is wrong - but think it's fine when done to "idiots"?  

 
Is there anything else that you think is wrong in general but ok to do to "idiots"? Steal from them? Deceive them? R0b them?  

 
Maybe beat them to a bloody pulp or even murdеr them?  

Whats the line one needs to cross where you will apply the "it's wrong, period" to everyone and not just people who aren't "idiots" in your opinion?  

 
I'd think people would stand up for fellow mongers and not just "smart" mongers, against unfair and uncalled for pii exposal of power happy AND trigger happy providers who go for doxing the moment they get upset. But apparently it's OK to dox someone for being an "idiot". Wow.

Golden_hampster 69 reads
posted
53 / 63
RegencyHobbyist 109 Reviews 57 reads
posted
54 / 63

Funny, as I read your repeated excuses and justifications I was thinking you sound more like her “manager” than an interested hobbyist.

Golden_hampster 62 reads
posted
55 / 63
NikkiSantana 23 reads
posted
56 / 63

As if the COPS DON'T KNOW WHO SHE IS.

I WOULD BE CONCERNED ABOUT THE IRS

NikkiSantana 20 reads
posted
57 / 63

I will be releasing a book soon about clients, prostitution, law enforcement, and the many tricks and traps.  After reading all this madness in this thread, I see that you ladies are making a big deal about it.  Amy is not a top provider, hooking is hooking. You women place too much emphasis on her and it blows up her phat ego.

However, I hope my book helps educate everyone about the many things you don't know about what clients and cops can do!  Regardless, AMY CAN GO TO PRISON JUST LIKE ANYONE ELSE, THE DA DOESN'T HAVE TO PROSECUTE, BUT THE IRS CAN GO AFTER ANYONE... SHE IS NOT EXEMPT FROM THE IRS AND FEDERAL PRISON.

durran421 20 reads
posted
58 / 63

Posted By: eastside70
Re: Another reason to not give RWI to ANY provider.
This!!⬆️⬆️ 👏

WIMissScarlet See my TER Reviews 19 reads
posted
59 / 63

Why are you commenting on a 2 year old thread? Is this just to advertise your book in which you are hinting you have a chapter about AT?

hehitshewins 23 reads
posted
61 / 63
coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 22 reads
posted
62 / 63

it's old news.  Mongers and providers alike have been discussing all of this right here on TER for over 20 years.  It's like you just discovered cell phones and want to write a book about it while it's still new TO YOU.  How stupid do you feel now?  

inicky46 61 Reviews 15 reads
posted
63 / 63
Register Now!