Seems you condone any punishment for any crime. You cops blather is bullshit.
Yes, another major doxxing and outing by a provider. This time, a "top" provider.
Here is the full outing/doxxing:
https://twitter.com/AmyTaylorNYC/status/1694187045290164570
In contrast, here is what she says on her site:
"Amy Taylor values discretion and protects anyone’s private and confidential information at all times. "
We cannot let these horrible women out men at will; trust is the glue that holds this thing together, and this is a horrible violation of trust.
Up for 8 hours, and not a single vote of dissent from other providers. Tacit approval? Silence is approval?
Ladies you need to get your shit together and call out your fellow providers who so egregiously breach trust.
We cannot let them do this with impunity; they must pay a price or this will get worse.
I ask you to:
Report her to tryst as a doxxer and danger to her community. the link is below:
https://app.tryst.link/reports/new?profile_id=3d9495a0-1f12-40d6-b51d-647078c6866b
Include a link to the doxxing in your report.
2) Report her profile to X/Twitter for being a danger to others.
3) Report her to OnlyFans for using their platform to solicit prostitution: @AmyTaylor
4) Find every site she uses (on her Tryst profile) and report her for using their platform for solicitation of prostitution.
We need to respond to doxxers and make them feel it in their pocketbook.
delete his booking form response and block him. No one would have been the wiser. Yet she chose to be a dangerous provider and expose his RWI on X for likes, rt's and sympathy/comic relief.
Another reason to not give RWI to ANY provider.
Honestly funny replies, but she should have definitely blocked out his info. A provider left a veiled threat to doxx me if I didn't leave her a good review, and it still scares me enough to not post it. Seeing things like this happen continually erodes my trust in the whole screening process.
Just wondering how many providers give clients the same info they request? Just wondering
I’m an honest provider with integrity who seeks lifetime friends with benefits, so I have no problem sharing my information with a serious gentleman who is transferring funds in large quantities. 🗣️
I am sure not many people are doing this, but I have never wanted to be like everyone else. When I started requiring deposits to book way back in 2010 that was frowned upon & now look at how many working women require deposits. 👀
We are all not the same, so no need to compare us. I love being unique!
-- Modified on 8/24/2023 5:17:05 AM
they are honest, have integrity, and are looking for long-term regulars . . . . . until a customer does something to piss them off. I'm sure there is a threshold at which you would consider doxing someone as well, but it may be much higher than the low trigger points some ladies have been shown to have, so trying to apply a one-size-fits-all policy to everyone is a fool's errand, and with these kinds of experiences being reported almost weekly here, it's probably happening a lot more than we even know of. Just as you have every right to claim that you would protect a customer's privacy, a customer has a right to protect his own privacy, and if that's a deal-breaker, then he will be spending his money with someone else. Since I have no idea where the trigger point is to get doxed with ANY particular provider, I will always choose to err on the side of caution and rely only on references from ladies who know me.
while i wouldn't of handled it the way she did, he brought up calling the cops!
That crossed the line.
She said later that he followed through and actually called on her.
with 4 doxxings on her timeline in the last few weeks. She does it out of maliciousness, and is deliberately disproportionate to the minor insult.
If you actually look at the screenshots on her timeline, she doxxess idiots. Why are you asking us to stand up for idiots?
Again, not saying I agree with her response but if you don't act like an idiot, you're not gonna get doxxed.
In conclusion, I don't care, I'm not reporting her, don't be an idiot.
PS - If a woman asks for occupation, company name and work number, I assume we're incompatible and don't reach out for an appointment
So let me get this straight.
You agree doxxing is wrong - but think it's fine when done to "idiots"?
Is there anything else that you think is wrong in general but ok to do to "idiots"? Steal from them? Deceive them? R0b them?
Maybe beat them to a bloody pulp or even murdеr them?
Whats the line one needs to cross where you will apply the "it's wrong, period" to everyone and not just people who aren't "idiots" in your opinion?
I'd think people would stand up for fellow mongers and not just "smart" mongers, against unfair and uncalled for pii exposal of power happy AND trigger happy providers who go for doxing the moment they get upset. But apparently it's OK to dox someone for being an "idiot". Wow.
Just stop. You sound like an unhinged lover.
Funny, as I read your repeated excuses and justifications I was thinking you sound more like her “manager” than an interested hobbyist.
As if the COPS DON'T KNOW WHO SHE IS.
I WOULD BE CONCERNED ABOUT THE IRS
If she supports what Amy did, will she do the same to others?
Just to be clear I don’t support doxing clients until it’s really serious then it would be a conversation with people in real life not the internet. I commented on her tweet doesn’t mean I would do that.. I don’t entertain time wasters, just block and move on.
at the expense of the guy who was doxxed. If you knew it was wrong, why comment in support of Ms. Taylor? Did you report the tweet to X? Did you tell Ms Taylor the doxxing was wrong? Did you ask her to take down the tweet?
You did not do the doxxing, but you supported it tacitly and explicitly. You are complicit in this man's ongoing outing.
Doxxing ruins lives. It costs divorce, loss of privilege to see children, loss of friends and family, loss of respect in the work community and even loss of job/career in some cases. Some guys who are doxxed receive death threats, as do other members of their families. Many of these are irrevocable and permanent effects. Doxxing is not being "told on"; it ruins lives.
I’m not saying it’s right, but he should’ve thought about all of that before sending her all those nasty messages.
Let me see if I read this correctly.
You’re not saying it is right, but it is right?
the dude is both stupid and nasty.
Still, the doxxing is uncalled for.
I sincerely appreciate this post. Too often when the lady is an asshole, everyone rushes to take her side. I certainly don't want to meet anyone who thinks doxing is okay. Block the guy and move on.
I'm not saying she's right but aren't you told NOT TO bring up sex until you have been screened?
Plus you did threaten to call the police on her.
conveniently left out he threaten to sick the police on her when all she did was cut and paste her into to him.
She said that this guy actually called the police, not just threatened to. It wasn’t in the main thread but she mentioned it a couple of times. If that’s how it got to that point, can you blame her?
Has anyone but me even bothered to report it and try to save this guy whatever additional pain he may receive?
For condoning : not only threatening a provider with calling the cops, but actually calling the cops on them for no reason.
Seems you condone any punishment for any crime. You cops blather is bullshit.
for more than 2 years. It is a hollow threat, and Amy certainly knew this. This was purely personal antagonism and malice aforethought.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/21/nyregion/manhattan-to-stop-prosecuting-prostitution.html
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/manhattan-stops-prosecuting-prostitution-1158879/
As long as they are in jurisdictions that don’t prosecute?
Wow. You’re one sick fuck.
unless there is physical harm, sexual assault or robbery - the worst types of things. In my view, this was not one of those situations.
You can make up all of the imaginary situations you want - this doxxing was undeserved and wrong.
that you support Amy's little doxxing adventure.
Why not do it with your real handle? Let everyone know what you stand for.
Everyone can then judge your own trustworthiness and discretion based upon their own interpretation of all of the facts and your own representations.
You come on here slamming all these women for doxxing, most instances I totally agree with you. While I wouldn’t handle Amy’s situation the way she did, he did threaten to call the cops on her I would’ve definitely blacklisted him. I have never posted anybody’s personal information on a public forum before.
But what makes you funny is that you’ll come on this board and slam each of these women but yet you are super friendly with them on Twitter. So does that make you?
Both come off like jerks are kinda doing the same thing.
doxxing was unnecessary. A block or even a blacklist would suffice, and never be mentioned by me.
As for being friendly, yes, I am. Why would I not be?
After a malicious doxxing, not so much.
But now that we all know you think this is a normal behavior, I would suggest YOU be blocked and blacklisted.
I can't believe you actually thing it's cool to call 50 on a woman (even if it's not prosecuted in the ladies home base).
He threatened to call the cops. Dumb move on his part, but doesn’t justify the doxxing.
and anyone that calls the police for no REASON deserves to be doxed.
The OP left this detail out because he gets burned by women all the time and as a personal grudge against SW's.
Whilst perusing twitter, X, (whatever the site's moniker is these days),
prompted by the "0P" @UnnamedOne's justified statement and links
regarding said Escort's shenanigans, I then scrolled through much of her
Profile timeline thereupon.
It appears she regularly "doxxes" anyone whom sends her "time-wasting"
requests and subsequent vulgar communications.
It's a commonality most Providers experience in this realm, resulting in
some unsavory characters seeping out of the woodwork.
I guess it just comes with the "cons" of this industry. (literally and figuratively)
Sure, I get miffed when I view them.
Some raunchy verbiage truly make my "virgin eyes" appalled! lol
However, one needs a thick skin to evolve, therefore elevate in this industry.
Thus, I "block" those that come at me with, what apparently, she deems-fit
for an "outing", on a public forum.
0ne might ponder her "outing" adventures of late,,, is that she's creating a
"media ruse" to accelerate her 0Fans and business in general, whereby the
notion "ANY" publicity is "G00D" publicity?
I tend to think so, as she's supposedly employed for her "day-job", at an
"Internet/Media" Company in New York.
What say you?
Angelina Jones
Yes, another major doxxing and outing by a provider. This time, a "top" provider.
Here is the full outing/doxxing:
https://twitter.com/AmyTaylorNYC/status/1694187045290164570
In contrast, here is what she says on her site:
"Amy Taylor values discretion and protects anyone’s private and confidential information at all times. "
We cannot let these horrible women out men at will; trust is the glue that holds this thing together, and this is a horrible violation of trust.
Up for 8 hours, and not a single vote of dissent from other providers. Tacit approval? Silence is approval?
Ladies you need to get your shit together and call out your fellow providers who so egregiously breach trust.
We cannot let them do this with impunity; they must pay a price or this will get worse.
I ask you to:
Report her to tryst as a doxxer and danger to her community. the link is below:
https://app.tryst.link/reports/new?profile_id=3d9495a0-1f12-40d6-b51d-647078c6866b
Include a link to the doxxing in your report.
2) Report her profile to X/Twitter for being a danger to others.
3) Report her to OnlyFans for using their platform to solicit prostitution: @AmyTaylor
4) Find every site she uses (on her Tryst profile) and report her for using their platform for solicitation of prostitution.
We need to respond to doxxers and make them feel it in their pocketbook.
so she is definitely habitual in her maliciousness.
over the past two years for Amy. She's prolifically malicious.
-- Modified on 8/26/2023 5:35:56 AM
A provider friend who had been around since the 00's had told me Amy Taylor was the provider who had the gun pulled on by the crazed earlier proprietor of TER about twenty years ago. So I'm sure some oldtimers here remember this infamous anecdote from back then. And that Amy Taylor used to be one of the top ter ranked ter and high-est end provider ladies since back in the mid 00's. As mentioned, plenty had since moved off of TER but still have ad sites on the flavor trend sites of recent years such as tryst.link , taken over the defunct cityvibe, or also on the twitter-sphere part of the hobby advertising now. My take is that her doxxing behavior is so unprofessional and unbecoming of a former top ranked provider. I had also noticed some of the top regional or nationally ranked TER providers had also been infected by today's woked and entitlement social engineered culture.
It used to be trusted that providers would delete personal information obtained after using it for screening purposes. Now it's like a client can't trust any provider including the 'premiere' agencies anymore of keeping to their written site word of deleting personal and RW information, with too many of these unprofessional 'retaliation' or other screwup examples. And of course the a-hole client of this thread's example could have been just blocked or ignored instead of Amy just responding with her cut'and'paste paragraph.
I used to follow Amy on social media until I saw her regularly complaining about guys, and doxxing guys who she thought were time wasters. Mind you, she hadn’t even met these guys, she just didn’t like that they wouldn’t comply with her strict screening process through her website. She regularly posted their texts on Twitter and Instagram, sometimes blacking out their contact information, other times including their names and contact information.
.
About this same time I realized that all of the pictures she posted on social media were stock photos of resort destinations, private jets, and other scenes meant to impress. The one thing that was missing from all of the pictures: Amy. She was never in the pictures because she wasn’t there. She simply posted generic pictures to imply that she lived a luxurious lifestyle. It’s a practice I’ve seen from a few high profile providers trying to give off the illusion that they live a jet-setting high profile lifestyle as a way to justify their exorbitant prices. In reality it’s usually bullsh*t.
.
Eventually I stopped following Amy a few years ago. Doesn’t surprise me what she did to this hobbyist because she’s been doing it for years. In my opinion she’s a provider to avoid like the plague. Overpriced and dangerous.
.
I agree with the prevailing sentiment in this thread: doxxing is only acceptable where a hobbyist has physically abused a provider or has stealthed a provider. Anything else is easily remedied by blocking or privately blacklisting a hobbyist who a provider considers a time waster or who sends inappropriate messages or whose company a provider doesn’t enjoy.
@RegencyHobbyist
Sir, You took the words out of my mouth precisely, when I perused "X" to investigate this
thread, and to latterly comment on escort "AT"!
(Click to glean my mostly unread observations regarding this "doxxing thread"):
https://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/she-has-a-history-of-doxxing-it-appears-1012302?page=1
I find her "X" profile and postings likened to a slick "Publicity Package".
A well-planned media marketing campaign is what I deduce, which entirely makes sense
since she supposedly is employed within the Media/Internet Marketing Industry, for her "day-job".
She has "premium" ad space on every escort site in the industry.
With said connections, she either secures it at a huge "media discount", or receives it gratis.
I'm not mad at her nor envious of her connections procured to promote her "escort services".
However, I am angry at her "outing" of personal information, as I see this as a dangerous trend
subsequently used by her adoring "escort friends" which could generate an overall breach within
the industry.
(The infamous "Ashley Madison" breach and subsequent Covid did enough damage already
... please...stop!)
Angelina Jones
I recall, late 90's early 2000''s I reached out to her, yes she's been around since then. I was transitioning from stripper world to escort world. I recall her tag was 400 then. When we spoke I found her to be very cordial and somewhat business like. We talked to get a feel for each other and she came to conclusion that maybe we weren't a good fit. At that time I was ok with it and I could sense that she was right. My playful nature most likely turned her off and I think she was looking more for a whale then some guppy like me. But she was cool and in after thought, she was probably right.
But as time went on, I recall some drama involving her. So now, I can guess that she's more of a no nonsense kinda chick...and time has probably taken it's toll on her.
Stuff like this just makes me avoid her and the cackling hens supporting her. I’m sure the feeling is mutual .
I will be releasing a book soon about clients, prostitution, law enforcement, and the many tricks and traps. After reading all this madness in this thread, I see that you ladies are making a big deal about it. Amy is not a top provider, hooking is hooking. You women place too much emphasis on her and it blows up her phat ego.
However, I hope my book helps educate everyone about the many things you don't know about what clients and cops can do! Regardless, AMY CAN GO TO PRISON JUST LIKE ANYONE ELSE, THE DA DOESN'T HAVE TO PROSECUTE, BUT THE IRS CAN GO AFTER ANYONE... SHE IS NOT EXEMPT FROM THE IRS AND FEDERAL PRISON.
Why are you commenting on a 2 year old thread? Is this just to advertise your book in which you are hinting you have a chapter about AT?