To me, the biggest limitation of TER profiles is that they mostly represent what the first reviewer writes. I say "mostly" because it is possible to fill out a problem report if there is something inaccurate in a profile and you can supply convincing evidence. I have done this several times so I know Staff will make changes when appropriate. One in particular comes to mind where the profile indicated "anal = yes" but I checked every review and not one of them mentioned anal. I submitted this evidence and it got changed to "anal = don't know."
So there's a provider who seems to be fairly well known in her home town and apparently by visitors as well judging by her reviews. She has 8 pages of reviews! No newbie to the game right? She's in her 40s. My question is when I read her profile how come there are still "don't know" columns? I'm thinking that after 40 years of life you have to have decided whether you allow X,Y, or Z, or not, right? Maybe it's the guys - maybe out of 80 reviews NO ONE asked for Greek? Do providers have any input on what is listed on their profiles? I've always wondered that. I've been with girls who were listed as B cup and they appeared to be A cup. I didn't measure and I bet none of the other hobbyists did (or is that a new fetish?).Do any of us really know the difference between a 24 inch waist and a 25?? So maybe the person who actually knows the answer should fill out the profile?
I think that maybe after a minimum of say 10 reviews (so that the mods can have a baseline to verify from. VIP providers should be able to complete the profile forms. Or maybe they can submit a separate one and we can still have the one that the guys filled out (if we're worried about any misleading info) Maybe the bottom of the review page could have a little link that takes us to the profile that the provider has approved.
Suggest this to the TER staff! I think it would clear up a lot of confusion.
Yeah -right now the first guy gets to call the tune and if he's not skilled with sizes ,cultural info, or full of questions info can be wrong.
For me, since I have a BS filter its all good, but some guys can be pissed
Please let's bear in mind that the review is "a work of fiction" by the reviewer. For a provider to submit a profile saying "I will suck your cock and swallow the proceeds" is something else.
If that part of the review can be done in some fashion to avoid LE concerns I'd say the PROVIDER should get to write the part(where she says the specific things she will do and her availability and contact info(all of it...not just how the first guy got a hold of her)
If the first guy writes mistakenly that she does a certain thing but she doesn't and some man later on picks her because he believes she does this act...he's gonna be pissed
I know of one lady personally who I've seen many times and until now she didn't want to be reviewed...last time though she said it would be OK so I asked her to look over the things that go into making the review and to fill that part out(what she will and will not do) then send it to me in an email and I was surprised...she apparently WILL do things I never asked of her and other things I thought she really liked(she travels with a friend sometimes and I thought this meant she was Bi-and likes it but according to her she just does it because some guys like it however she'd LOVE to have a session with two guys)
That is not likely to come up with me since it's not one of MY things but I'm sure it's information that some other future client might find interesting
For those reasons I'd like to see the review reformatted so one section which had all the items that would be BEST answered by the provider...the reviewer could answer those questions but the provider would have a ONE-TIME OPTION at a later date to change whatever needed to be changed in ONLY that section to accurately reflect her program
In my experience, once an initial review has been posted, the staff at TER does not change any of the data until and unless someone files a problem report. For instance, if the first reviewer feels that a provider looks 26, he will input that data. Two years later and one hundred reviews later, it turns out that the woman has changed her ad to read "in early 30s," the review still reads 25-29. It takes a problem report to change it.
Same with tatoos, various kinds of sex, the price of the visit. Only a problem report to TER will fix it.
I've updated several things that way--my hair, height, and a couple of performance areas (for example, after a doubles review, I asked them to change from "don't know" to "really bi" on the profile. I also changed "don't know" to "no" for anal.)
Find message, search smbum as author for last 30 days = all posts about me, hiding behind his alias.
He didn't like my earlier post regarding reviews, so he is just doing what losers do on rainy days when they can't ride their tricycle. Whine and complain.
Yeah, there's three sides to every story - your side, his side, and the truth.....
Find message, search smbum as author for last 30 days = all posts about me, hiding behind his alias.
He didn't like my earlier post regarding reviews, so he is just doing what losers do on rainy days when they can't ride their tricycle. Whine and complain.
Not only are these filled out by the hobbyist and not the provider, but the profile reflects the entries of the FIRST person to provide a review of said provider.
It will stay that way for years unless somebody notices a discrepancy and submits a trouble report. Incidentally, approved trouble reports will get you two days of VIP credit.
To me, the biggest limitation of TER profiles is that they mostly represent what the first reviewer writes. I say "mostly" because it is possible to fill out a problem report if there is something inaccurate in a profile and you can supply convincing evidence. I have done this several times so I know Staff will make changes when appropriate. One in particular comes to mind where the profile indicated "anal = yes" but I checked every review and not one of them mentioned anal. I submitted this evidence and it got changed to "anal = don't know."