Obviously we know which one is better. I'm curious though as to everyone's thoughts on why some providers are shown as doing BBBJ but within their reviews are buried, here and there, whispers of a CBJ being performed. My initial thought is "bro your dick was probably weird", but I've been wrong before.

The gent preferred CBJ for safety reasons.  
The lady stopped offering BBBJ.
The initial reviewer lied or made a data entry error.

is offered, it doesn't automatically mean that CBJ is not on the menu.  There are many instances where CBJ can happen even if usually the hooker offers BBBJ.  If the guy wants a CBJ, I doubt any hooker will decline that.  Other than that, cleanliness is paramount for hookers to be comfortable w/ BBBJ.

If it’s dirty and nasty. I’m not going down on her either. I expect the same feelings from her.One reason why I liked to play in Japan. No matter what you both get in and clean each other . It’s part of the process and it’s sensual . I hate cbj and it’s an auto no go for me.

-- Modified on 3/27/2023 4:49:55 PM

Would you want to suck/eat stinky head cheese?  
Some guys are just fucking clueless when it comes to personal hygiene.

Many things are YMMV. I saw a provider once whose profile and reviews said no kissing. For whatever reason she DFK'd me like crazy. Who knows what drove her to do that.

melts the condom, she still has a problem.  Lol

How can it be YMMV? Women are people too and they do what works for them. I've also had some ladies spend off-the-clock time with me despite the fact that it "breaks the rules" that they have posted on her website (as well as the rules in general).

providers, gals, ladies, escorts, companions, and any one of many respectful words - yet you chose the term "Hookers".  

When I am with a lady who will BBBJ but who does not do CIM, I have sometimes requested a CBJ so I can blow my load while she is sucking away.

I will do Bareback Blow Jobs but I won't allow the guy to cum in my mouth.