I recently submitted a provider review that included a 10 performance score. However, the review was not approved because it failed to meet certain services "offered" criteria. This is a flawed policy.  You cannot objectively score subjective service.  If I think the woman deserves a 10 that should communicate that she rocked my world whether she offered every conceivable sexual permutation or not. Maybe I don't want everything available. Maybe she finds some practices dangerous or distasteful. That should not prevent a perfect score if she was perfect for me.  

Someone will correct me but I think they are reevaluating the scoring system here and plan on making changes.

and many people, including myself, would agree, but TER makes the rules, so that is that.

I tend to rate high like you, but unlike looks-that is very subjective-performance has boundaries and is more objective. If you are with a provider who does massage only, and no BBBJ's, DFK and/or anal, one can only give a "7". These providers are aware of this. If you see someone who offers only covered BJ's, that's still a 7.  

I have had the very same thing happen with a few of my reviews. For instance, I am not at all interested in Greek, and so if it's not on her menu then I could care less, but now I can't give her a 10. To be clear, if it's on her menu and you don't choose to partake you can still give her a 10.

She needs to do 3 of the following 5:

many girls get profiled as "really bi" in order for a reviewer to game the system, when in fact, they don't know for sure and the girl has never offered doubles.  If a girl has been reviewed in a doubles session, then you can still give her a 10 thereafter even if you see her individually, because she is already established as "really bi".  Although "anal" and "more than one guy" holds little or no interest for me, I find the "really bi' trait to be a reasonable threshold to receive a perfect score of 10 for service.  However, it needs to be fact-based, not illusory in order to give a higher score.  If I were pope of this place, I would require a link to a doubles session review in order to allow a 10 based on "really bi."

I think you correctly state the rules on how extra points may be earned, but other than the word of the provider that she's "really bi" or willing to do MFM, it's meaningless. I've seen many scores above 7 that say really bi but there are  no doubles mentioned in any review or on her site. It seems like an easy cheat. If I'm incorrect, please let me know.

I like threesomes a lot but a guy that doesn't should still be able to give a girl who doesn't do them a 10 if he wants.

Seems the rules are applied/enforced rather haphazardly.

is "really bi". My first two doubles sessions (8-10 years ago before I knew better) were with providers who didn't interact with each other. Both just paid attention to me and the sessions were enjoyable. But, nothing near what a session is like when the providers are "really bi".

in the juicy details, my review has been rejected claiming I can't write that. Of note, I've seen the same written 100 times. Eh.  

..right after they roll out the new TER software they told us all about last year.

you can add 1 if she's bi.

assuming a bbbj (+1), dfk (+1) and if she suggests a double with her friend so she's bi (+1) takes you to 10.

My ATF didn't partake in Greek when I was seeing her, she recently started gentle Greek and is currently on hiatus. But this woman rocked my world like no other, all other providers I've seen are measured to the bar which she set, looks, performance and personality. A few have come close and have gotten 10's from me, but none have surpassed her.

but I do get the reason for making every reviewer fill out the profile. They want you to earn your 15 days of free VIP. There are enough fake reviews out there as it is, can you imagine how many more there would be if you could pop them out in 2-3 minutes time?

I was suggesting that a claim of "really bi" would have to be linked to a doubles review that SHOWED the girl was bi from what the reviewer described as some FF action within the session.  I agree with you that many doubles sessions, especially with Kgirls, is just two girls tag-teaming you and doing half the work each for the same money

I've been only doing this for ten+ years but if there's one thing I've learned it's to read reviews. And I ONLY put credence into reputable reviewers. And gals. I still check reviews from guys I read when I started. It works for me.  

i am bi, but do not associate with other providers...my bi part comes for couples that seek a bi female...i should not have to offer a double session with another provider to be "really bi"

They might not be a problem for you, but they are a problem for both the guys and the girls alike. Any that cuts down on review fraud is a good thing as far as I am concerned.

understood. I just see it as the 80/20 rule. With the ability to search for escorts with 0nly 9 and 10 performance scores, we'd all create the same Top 10 list for our respective areas. Needless to say, these are the ladies I'd prefer to see when the rate is in my play zone

It is possible for a massage provider to get a 10 in this system without  offering traditional FS sex.
I just find that more than a little odd.

Just kidding.  
As mentioned previously, the rules are applied haphazardly. I once gave a provider a 10 for performance, even though she didn't meet the criteria, and it went through. She subsequently updated the menu items on her profile.

This has been discussed many times on S&P, too.

but it's TER's site so they get to make the rules and seems like a lot of people have learned how to deal with it.

The services listed, like anal, BBJ, really bi, and----my favorite on this stupid list---BGB, only have to be OFFERED, not delivered.

Your approach solves some types of problems -- and perhaps is preferable to what is currently in place.

with no access to the Juicy details, I learned to rely on the General Discussion. And of course, info provided by those whose opinions and descriptions I learned to trust in a very short time.  

you read earlier, that there'll be those who will fall short in the description of the Juicy details, while mine might be considered  
the opposite ... lengthy anyhoo

There are flaws with TER that I don't like but review scoring is definitely the BEST part about TER.

But a guy isn't going to know if she is really bi or not, so right off the bat that is (IMHO) a bogus score option that hopefully TER will remove if or when they revamp the scoring system.

Sadly even a doubles session doesn't mean that she is really bi. All it means is that she is willing to at least make it look good enough to pass, and most guys wouldn't be able to tell the difference. It really ruins it for folks searching for a TRULY bi provider and virtually everyone of the profiles here lists "really bi". The odds alone tell you that it is unlikely that 90% of the providers on TER are "really bi", tho that is what the profile says. makes the search that much harder having to weed out the gay for pay and the all-out frauds.

Really Bi
More than one guy

Subjective evaluations are too subject to YMMV...there have to be objective measures that we can all agree on, since reviews are a key criterion to others in evaluating who to see.

i don't really care what the english designations of the scoring increments; they could be named after the 7 dwarves and 3 stooges for all i care.

Yes, u  cannot REALLY tell if a girI Is bi unless they are me or you are lopaw.

worth the money
not worth the money
worth way more

For the record, I completely agree with you. While DFK and BBBJ are VERY important to me, and I suppose I can see how anal could be a criteria to add points even though it's not really very important to me, the other two are completely meaningless to me. As a man, why would I even know much less care if the women I have sex with are bi, and as for BGB as you like to put it, I am with you 100% in not ever being with you in the same fucking bed with our clothes off and I don't have any male friends THAT fucking close.

I have never been questioned on preformance  numbers despite not meeting the TER critearia on some  of my reviews ,I don't agree with the rule that (really bi) is needed to get a 10 rating.