What is your immediate reaction when a reviewer mentions his size in a review?

Size matters in everything in life and a cock is not exempted.  

I have no reaction...  It's a part of human anatomy extremely critical to achieve penetration and subsequent ejaculation..    

The only time I would mention size in a review is if it had some bearing on the session.  For example, I like Greek, but some ladys have limits on the size cock they will permit in the back door.  If size factors in the session it should be mentioned.

My first impressions are:

Kinda like , whatever..🤷🏻‍♂️

I'm only 5 inches and I'm going to lose my virginity soon to escorts I found here. I know my size isn't much but I also know some ladies prefer something smaller & it's more about how I use it.

Only if she charges by the inch.  

like "I'm 6-8, 260 pounds," is usually the sign of insecurity, lying, or both.   Having seen a large number of providers, I have learned from the ladies" perspective that the only size that matters with a customer is "TOO Big."   Anything else is manageable in most cases.  However, if she is on the hunt for outside boyfriend material, she may be more opinionated about what she will accept.   Lol

What size?

Except you have yet to see any escorts, right?

or were you talking about yourself?  Lol

Standard white guy issue, however i am older now and have a bit of a belly, so size??? Haven't seen it in a while

Topics don't die on this site as much as YOU may want them to.

If size matters, explain lesbians.

You never seen lesbians using strap ons?

Agreed. If the review talks about how they had some trouble fitting in, and then they mention they're a magnum, it's relevant info. Or for example greek refusal because of size. Or maybe the other way around where the provider felt loose but client also has below average girth...also relevant info and provides context. More than fine, this is how reviews should be imo.  

Most providers I've met strongly prefer a 12" wallet over a 12" cock.

Yep,

the most honest, yet entertaining, poster of the year.  Lol

the reviewer, she said I was handsome or so BIG, and any other compliments about the reviewer are not helpful to the reader in making a choice to see the provider or not!
They'll describe themselves, but not the girl that the review should be about!

If only you were charged by the inch then everyone would be small!

are not into penetration with phallic-resembling instruments.  They will use tongues, fingers and toys other than penis shaped.  Dildos are more popular with girls who are bi-sexual.   If you would be willing to keep your pants on, and can touch your forehead with your tongue, you might have a chance with one, but then again, why would you want to.   Lol

A delightful lady of my occasional acquaintance puts in her ads "Not Magnum Approved!".  
I'm pretty sure she does this not because of any vaginal  limitation on her part,  
but to discourage any guy who think he's entitled because "Large".

We don't need explanation.  
We simply 'are'. 😁

Your reading comprehension could use some work....

THAT.  Lol

...and then I mentally change any pronoun referring to him in his review to "KING DONG" and then keep reading.

If they mention their size and it is related to an issue or a refusal of service I get it and I appreciate it. That being said that is also the only time I've mentioned it. If you get a comment of too big, or the visit turns into oral only I would like to know that because who wants to waste your time and money if that is the service you are going to get.

So weary of this topic when there's so much fun to be had and time is so precious...

EXACTLY!!