And though they should be a roughly norman distribution, they won't be.  Subjective scores almost always bunch at the two ends more than they should.

But you got the info you need.  Use the list of activities to tell you what she will do.  Use the performance number to tell you how well she does them.  Most any other interpretation will just get you pissed unnecessarily.  just because your ideal "10" performance is greek while standing one legged on a swivel chair doesn't mean others have the same def of a "10" and they never will.  If a score is nothing more than a string of activities it becomes duplicative.

Seven is the baseline, and indicates that she made a genuine effort to please you without bullshit, sans DFK, BBBJ, doubles, or trips to the Aegean.  I will adjust upwardly if these specific items are part of the package, and if you know how to hobby, read reviews, practice good hygiene and treat them like ladies, these generally will be.

Ratings of six are below are negative in some way.  As for the current Top 100 rating system, it is flawed to the point of being unusable.

have two posts on the Carolina Board, this is your only post on this Board, you have two reviews, and now you are giving the rest of us a sermon about what we should be doing?

Except for the somewhat-wacky "Dave-imposed" 10-performance rating requirements (which have changed for those who don't bother to read before they submit a review), we've done just fine here, thank you.

yes! NIST.... ;-)

the National Institute of Standards and Technology is responsible for measurement standards in the US. as part of their program to assure that the measures used in commerce are fair and not BS and that this board's measures are standardized they actually spent $623 million to capture the Greek goddess Aphrodite. she is MOST beautiful. she's certainly from the Greek isles AND the Greek mainland. what better standard could there POSSIBLY be?

unfortunately the lady was a bit the worse for wear, having suffered the ravages of time because of dwindling numbers of devotees. it has been a long time since anyone has sacrificed doves, myrtles, sea shells, and roses to her. and while the goddess may be immortal, she needs offerings to keep up her appearances!

so the guys at NIST did the next best thing. they constructed a nickel-platinum likeness of her guided by DCs best reconstructive forensics experts. they discovered that the reconstructed image bore a remarkable resemblance to a TER lady (i'm not saying who) who DOES NOT offer Greek. what to DO!???

after consulting with me they wound up performing a huge number of ritual sacrifices of doves until Aphrodite herself was looking healthy and youthful again. that's actually where most of the $623 million went. they decided to make a film of a Greek performance by the goddess herself. i declined the male role since Greek does not interest me. (so you can breathe a sigh of relief there.) they brough the real Adonis back for that. (planting seeds in shallow soil, a fairly inexpensive sacrifice and so no big strain on the budget).

so if you want to see the recognized standard of appearance and performance get over to NIST. ADJUST YOUR SCORES ACCORDINGLY! LOL!

If you want to start a riot ...

Revise performance numbers by creating a performance to price ratio called the value equation, and populate the top-100 list by value ratio rather than performance average.

Value = (Average Appearance + Average Performance)/Minimum Booking Price

I'm not saying to do that, because I think the results would not be anywhere close to valid as it would multiply the errors that already exist in performance grading.

I'm just saying that doing it would start a riot.

Seriously, a 10 rating for no kiss girl. That's not GFE or PSE....simply HE (Hooker Experience)

I know that it's a business and I don't want to take food out of the mouths of anyone.......but if "things" aren't what they were supposed to be.....tell us!!!!!    Everyone can't be model material and "forgot it was a service"!!!!!!

Looks don't hurt either. I'm by no means ugly and have given a great time only to get a 6, 7 or 8.