Hey,

Curious if anybody has opinions about 3-somes on an initial meeting?  Better?

DC

Personally, I would not usually go for a 3-way on my first meeting with a certain provider. If the initial one-on-one goes well, and if she has a friend she will bring along on a subsequent appointment, then I'll explore that possiblity. But if I do a threesome on the first meeting, and don't happen to gee-haw with one or the other, then I've just wasted a lot of money. But that's just me.
jhb

They were just OK however.

Most times it was like a tag team where you start with one gal and then the other takes over.

More interesting were the acrobatic sessions. In one case, one of the gals was pregnant.  Did that make it a menage a quatre?   Of course I was a bit more spry back then.

Now-a-days I think one on one is better, but I will see two gals if the chemestry is right.

My very first experience ever was a 3-way with two very well reviewed and highly rated ladies in Vegas. I had done a TON of research before setting things up and had a great time. Although there was less interaction between the ladies than I expected, they both made up for it by paying a lot of attention to me. Who was I to complain! The experience was a lot of fun and I certainly had enough things to explore to keep myself occupied. It's something that still holds an attraction for me and should the opportunity present itself I'd do it again. It does put a dent in the finances since your paying for 2 SP’s, but sometimes you just have to say WTF and go for it.

C_K


-- Modified on 8/6/2008 6:32:35 AM

Then seeing both of them at the same time is not only offered, but mandatory.  

Ahh the memories...

Three is always a good thing in is good to join a socialization club like laphondue to hookup with those who will show u the ropes!

This has happened to me twice: both wonderful experiences.  Once in Phoenix with two lovely ladies, I spent a lot of time talking with one before I got to Phoenix.  We all enjoyed ourselves together (I had a great time and think and hope they both had a good time as well) for two hours.  Then I took them both to dinner.  Then I ended with an hour or so with one of them.  It was wonderful.  Unfortunately for me, the one with whom I had the best connection is no longer active.  The other time, I began with a lady who became one of my favorites (and a friend).  After about two hours during which she had me do stuff I had never done before, she called her friend and told her to come over because she thought her friend would enjoy what was going on.  Again a great time.  In general, I prefer to get to know someone one on one first.  But if the lady prefers a trio, sure.

I would want to know one of the ladies first. This is something that's definitely high on my list of thigs to do.

To go along with my previous post, I've seen two providers individually who also do doubles with each other and they've thrown that possibility out for me to ponder. Some day soon I'm taking the plunge.
jhb

For me the experience was all of the excitement of a one on one exponentialed. Given that, I was glad that I had seen the one lady previously and we hit it off well. It made me much more relaxed than I would have been otherwise.

Oh, by the way, given your handle, shouldn't this be placed on the P&R board? Just joking!

-- Modified on 8/6/2008 8:22:22 AM

-- Modified on 8/6/2008 8:23:03 AM

My first threesome was with 2 ladies I had not met before (other than once socially) and who had never worked with each other before. One of the best nights of my life (it helps when you have hours and hours to flirt, play, and savor the time)

I'd want to know at least one of the ladies first.  Still, I took a chance and the first duo I ever saw were two ladies who I'd never seen before.  I must have gotten lucky as we all seemed to click and had a great time.  Though I don't know if I'd do it again on an initial meeting.

First of all, thanks everybody for the input.  I knew I could count on the ubiquitous Mr Fisher for his input.  Is there anything he hasn't done or hasn't an opinion on?

Secondly, this is the opportunity of a lifetime for me.  The two I'm eyeing are well reviewed her both with 9's and 10's.  I'm thinking it will be a major fuck extravaganza and I've never hosted a 3'some.  I will be traveling to a major city from friggin' podunk where the daily fare is GTT (glorified trailer trash - please add to newbie FAQ lol).

I know what I'm thinkin'.  Let's hear more...

-- Modified on 8/6/2008 2:09:07 PM

I think that your risk for disappointment is far less if they play well together.  Others have mentioned a fear that you'll like one more than the other, but you certainly don't want to be the only common denominator in the room...ooh, wait that might be good after all.

The only one I've done so far was with 2 ladies that I'd seen before individually, that also worked together.  I've tried at a couple other pairings but haven't aligned all the starts.  Still, it can be great.

for my birthday present to me.  I have seen them each separately and I know they do doubles together.  Should be a sweet time.

Well, I've done three of them, and they were all with providers I was seeing for the first time (well, they kind of had to be as I was in towns I had never been to before.)  The first two were great.  Actually, the second one was my single best sexual experience ever.  I'm smiling right now remembering it.  The third one was pretty good, but not great.  Which was more of an issue with the (very young) providers than the threesome.  And it was still pretty fun.

Stick to well reviewed providers, and it's probably better to ask one of the providers to suggest a second (subject to your approval, of course) so you don't accidentally get two girls who have some kind of vendetta against one another.  That would be bad.



Light

-- Modified on 8/7/2008 11:03:27 PM