Oh boy, you’re annoyed by that, you must be annoyed easily then. Ladies look out for this one, he annoys easily. WTF does it matter?
I wanted to start a new thread on this matter for clarity and flow. Since my integrity has been questioned, I will clarify a few points once and then move on.
My reviews have been vetted and supported by TER itself, including the awarding of 100 VIP days. That alone should put to rest the claim that they are “fake.” I’ve been part of this community since its early days, and long before that on other boards. I don’t need to fabricate experiences to validate my presence here.
For those citing guidelines, I encourage you to read them carefully — particularly sections 9 through 11. The keyword is “should,” not “must.” There is no hard rule requiring a specific posting timeframe beyond the recommended three months. Nor is there a requirement that location be listed as a city. Listing “hotel” or “apartment” is accurate and truthful.
As for the volume of reviews — seeing 20 providers within 30 days is not mathematically impossible, nor is traveling locally within Boston somehow implausible simply because I live there. Assumptions are not evidence.
Ratings, particularly for looks, are inherently subjective. Beauty, chemistry, personality, conversation, attitude — these all factor into a personal score. What earns a 7 for one member may be a 10 for another. That’s the nature of opinion-based platforms.
Performance ratings follow TER’s established GFE framework, though I personally believe a two-tier system separating services offered from execution quality would be more constructive. That’s a suggestion for improvement, not criticism.
For members using TER to make decisions: look at patterns. Review volume. Reviewer history. Consistency. A single dissenting opinion — especially from someone with limited activity — should not outweigh a broader body of work.
If a member has a genuine question about a review, the respectful approach is to message the reviewer directly before making public accusations. That maintains the integrity of the community we all participate in.
I’ve addressed this once. I consider the matter closed.
But you went to these lengths to defend yourself and that made me question it now.....
TBH. If someone says your reviews are fake I'd just say, I saw her, we had fun, or she was terrible. It's my opinion of the value.
The concern raised had nothing to do with the accuracy, substance, or quality of my reviews. It was about formatting — specifically listing “hotel” or “apartment” rather than naming a specific city location — and about submitting several reviews within the same month rather than spacing them out over the full 90-day window.
Both practices are fully within TER guidelines. There is no hard requirement to list a specific city in the location field, and the 90-day language clearly states reviews should be submitted within that timeframe, not that they must be staggered evenly throughout it. TER has reviewed the matter and confirmed that everything I submitted complies with their rules.
This was never about fake content. It was never about fabricated experiences. It was never about misleading information.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. What isn’t productive is questioning someone’s integrity without first understanding the actual guidelines.
I’ve been contributing for decades and have no reason to jeopardize that by cutting corners. My reviews stand on their own.
With that clarified, I’m moving on.
I agree with saying hotel vs City. No reason to give LE location
Or stalkers ! We have enough issues already. Info should broad but give enough needed information. We don’t need any other problems.
You're absolutely right in pointing out that TER allows 90 days to submit a review. I would suggest that when doing so it is more helpful to update the month rather than letting it default to the current month. That does create confusion, and to some extent might mislead some into thinking the review is very recent where as it might be from more than 2 months in the past. That time lag may or may not matter but I do think it's something readers should be aware of.
And that isn't really just for you, pretty much anyone reviewing should pay attention to that field.
The ambiguity of the Location field has been the subject of several posts to the Policy and Suggestion board over the years. Some think that TER should have TWO fields, "Geographic Location" (City) and "Real Estate Location" (hotel, apartment, "her place", ...)
.
See, for example:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/suggestion-and-policy-4/session-location-geography-or-real-estate-17032
"very Review has a field for "Session Location." However, there is considerable ambiguity about the meaning and even how specific to be.
.
The Major BIG ambiguity is that some reviewers think it means GEOGRAPHIC location with varying degrees of specificity:
New York, Los Angeles, Boston, ...
or at higher resolution:
Manhattan (NYC), K-Town (LA), Back Bay (Boston), ...
.
But some reviewers interpret that as the alternative option and specify the type of real estate location:
Her Hotel, My Home, My Hotel, Her private location (apartment or rental), AMP apartment, Studio apartment, ..."
...
.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/suggestion-and-policy-4/re-still-no-guarantee-17212
"...
If the suggestion is to add DISPLAYED fields to the final REVIEW itself, that's different! There is already info on the forms that needs to be changed or improved. E.g., "LOCATION" is totally ambiguous. Some enter a geographic location ("New York", "Las Vegas," ...). Others enter a real estate location ("her hotel room," "my home," ...). That info is currently displayed at the top of each review but TER needs to fix THAT, among other things. Add a new displayed field (geography AND real estate) or clarify the instructions: Location (city, NOT real estate), Place (hotel, cabin by the sea, alpine chalet, ..., NOT geographic city), etc.. ..."
The concern raised had nothing to do with the accuracy, substance, or quality of my reviews. It was about formatting — specifically listing “hotel” or “apartment” rather than naming a specific city location — and about submitting several reviews within the same month rather than spacing them out over the full 90-day window.
Both practices are fully within TER guidelines. There is no hard requirement to list a specific city in the location field, and the 90-day language clearly states reviews should be submitted within that timeframe, not that they must be staggered evenly throughout it. TER has reviewed the matter and confirmed that everything I submitted complies with their rules.
This was never about fake content. It was never about fabricated experiences. It was never about misleading information.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. What isn’t productive is questioning someone’s integrity without first understanding the actual guidelines.
I’ve been contributing for decades and have no reason to jeopardize that by cutting corners. My reviews stand on their own.
With that clarified, I’m moving on.
On my last account i once wrote "her behind" as location
Fairly certain its still up almost 20 years later
But how do you know it’s her place? It could be a borrowed place or an Airbnb. I use Airbnb a lot and the guy walks in and says you have a lovely house . Uh yeah thanks but not mine. First of all that is just creepy even if you think you are being “ nice”. I often don’t even stay in the place I get I just do my appts and then get another place to sleep in. Just added layer of protection for myself.
IDK, it always annoys me when the generic "hotel" is the location listed as opposed to the city name, requirement or not. I also don't believe naming the city puts any additional risk on the reviewer or the companion.
Oh boy, you’re annoyed by that, you must be annoyed easily then. Ladies look out for this one, he annoys easily. WTF does it matter?
I'm not sure if that's really what he's asking for but naming a hotel in a review or on the boards is a red flag for LE. You might as well put a big sign on the place reading "Hookers R Here!"
Damn the density of some is amazing. I don’t put the name of the Hotel, I just put “hotel” or in some instances there were a couple of AMPs around the area that ran out of a few apartments. Just vanilla location, I’m listing at as Hilton, Marriott or Hyatt with a street address, but I have seen some reviews where the reviewer has done that.
First of all, I was AGREEING with you.
Thanks, it’s just been a long few days with this and, I’ve never been question in over 25 years on this site publicly before, most up till know have been respectful and PM about a review or questions and I’ve always responded in kind. But it seems the way now is to try to out someone, get them tossed off the site, just to get their jollies. I stand by my reviews, they are well within the guidelines set by TER and shouldn’t have to be explained. If you have a question about a specific review or provider always happy to respond, even if I don’t agree or don’t have the answer you want. Lots of time’s I’m asked about specific things about a provide and my review is my review, somethings are between me and the provider and YMMV is always a thing, no matter who you are provides are humans and they can react differently with each encounter, chemistry, hygiene and attraction always play a part.
That's one reason why I don't post here as often as I used to. There are far too many arcane arguments about nuances of language and meaning, few of them truly helpful in terms of the main purpose of the site.
That, plus the toxic stalkers who lurk on the fringes.
It used to be the Wild West but was a lot of fun. Now? Not so much.
All I said was it annoys me to see "Hotel" as opposed to the city name. The city name is another data point. Maybe you're the one who is easily annoyed and no I didn't imply that the hotel brand should be listed in any way, so not sure where that came from.
I find the use of “hotel”, “apartment” and the dreaded “incall” and “outcal” in the session location useless and not very helpful.
When I see that, I’ll just skip the review entirely
Session location, to me is very important
I don’t even notice that field. I must be missing something but how could it be so important that you wouldn’t even read the review? 🤔
He’s from California, that explains a lot. Must be one of them Gavin Newsome, Mayor Bass, rump swabs. If it ain’t their way it’s the highway. That’s the problem with the left coast.
And I probably could have said something… seeing you and I have been here awhile
So chill the fuck out
You were playing nice for awhile
Quit while you’re still ahead
I apologize, it’s just been amazingly crazy how many people are upset or questioning why I didn’t put location as city and the date, especially when I followed the TER GUIDELINES. Seriously, just move past bashing me(not you) others, if you have an issue with TER GUIDELINES, take it up with them. I’m not changing how I write my reviews to appease those triggered by a location and date when I’m following the rules as stated. Don’t read my reviews then. Don’t questions how often. i see providers and how much money I choose to spend or why I consider this a lifestyle and not a hobby. Its maddening. 😂 Frankly it’s nobody’s damn business but mine.
I have been on your side through this thing but trashing Hypy isnt the way to go here. He is a good guy and has tons of cred here. He deserves to be respected. Bringing politics onto this board is also a bad look as well.
Why bother reading a review if there’s isn’t a remote chance of me visiting her?🤔
Here, check this out.,,
I live or say “play” in a certain area based the proximity to where I’m at.Young lady host to in an area that is far from me. But because session location is “Hotel”… I really don’t know how far I’d have to drive to visit her. Use the LA area as an example. It’s a large area where traffic needs to be considered and the time. Driving 1 hour to and back isn’t on my bingo card 🤣
And…. I hate reaching out to someone and then asking where they’re hosting at.
Anyways… that’s how I see it 🤷🏻♂️
I guess since we play so differently, that is just a non factor for me. I play in NYC and Philly so NYC girls are almost in Midtown (or nearby) and Philly girls are in what we call, "Center City" i.e. our downtown area, for the most part.
.
I guess since LA is just so large and so sprawling, incall can truly be very far from you. I remember I was staying in Beverly Hills one time, ages ago with friends, and we went to Disney. "It's all LA" so I thought, so how far can it be? Good lord it took us like almost 2 hours to get there! lol.
.
Our concierge told us, that in LA, you never ask how far away a destination is...you ask how long it takes to get there. So true. lol.
Fair point, but I’m only going to read reviews of providers. I’m interested in seeing and are visiting my area or local, before I get to reviews, I’m looking at the Buzz board, X (formally Twitter), Tryst and on occasion Eros, but very minimal, it’s become a waste of a tool. If members are just trolling other members to see who they have reviewed, that seems odd. I’m trolling the provider and seeing if they have reviews from reputable members. When I look at a potential provider, I’ll see if they are reviewed, how far back they go and then look at the reviewers themselves. I almost automatically disregard if they have one reviewer who’s given a low score, then look at members and see if they have seen other providers I’ve seen and read there reviews of those providers first to see if it aligns with my experience with that other provider. This gives me a good baseline, Also if that member has been on TER for sometime, over a newbie. This is true for most of the non Asian providers, the Asian providers almost always have fake or paid reviews and they usually come in clumps. But the AMPs are usually less risky, the service across most is almost always the same, I’d say 90 to 95% of the time at least here in the Boston area. They train those Asian girls well.
I'm also in LA, and location is certainly relative. Since many surrounding cities, SFV, and even the OC ladies use LA, the distance can be wildly different. That said, I read reviews of ladies outside of LA all of the time. If I see an escort that peaks my interest, which means she has good reviews, attractive, etc..., I will look to see if she tours. If she does, I will add her to my watch list. But only after reading the reviews. I have seen more touring ladies not from LA than I have local LA ladies.
Once the review is opened, your looking at the location tab in the upper right? I don't know if I've ever paid attention to that but obviously I have to the city mentioned in the main review panel. Seems to me the way providers move around, whatever was written into that field a few days (or months) prior would more than likely be the most useless bit of information in the whole review. Is it not plausible for a local hotty to have incall in Gardena on one day and in Long Beach a few days later? Given the delay in getting reviews published, that alone would make me skeptical whether that location was still valid.
Regardless, after the review passes muster and a decision is made, are you telling us that you don't ask where she's at immediately?
Why not defend himself? Wouldn’t you if it was you? Or would you do something differently?
I already believed you. And, from what I saw in the previous thread, just about everybody did. Starting a new thread to drive this point further I find unnecessary. Now it feels like you’re clamoring for extra attention.
....damn....lol
My apologies to all, was not my intent. Carry on with your mongering.
While I don't doubt that you have met all these women, I find it unlikely that you actually met all 20 in September. In the other thread you even stated that you see more providers than you review, so are you claiming that you met even more than 20 in September? Even if we were to assume you met them all within past 3 months, which is what qualifies for VIP, 20 providers is hard to believe because that would be 7 per month, basically 2 per week. Not to mention how much time spent traveling to incall locations and then the hour or more appointments. And some of the girls are on higher end of rates which would put you in the 1% tax bracket to see so many in 3 months let alone 1 month. Not impossible but improbable.
It's also strange that you would create a new thread to justify yourself when the other thread was still receiving replies. Mounting multi paragraph defenses and replying several times with more justifications. Doth protest too much?
I personally wouldn't have called it out in a public forum post but now that there are 2 threads it qualifies in the, where there's smoke there's fire category. In my opinion, TER shouldn't have accepted all of the reviews without asking for proof that they did occur within the same month. Otherwise you are basically gaming the VIP system by dumping multiple months of reviews all in current month.
You state that you don't doubt he has met all the women he claimed while simultaneously saying "where there's smoke there's fire." You certainly come off as doubting him, tbh.
.
He also stated that he didn't see all the women in September. In another thread which you may have missed, he said he saw them from June through September. I think a reasonable critique is that he didn't put each review into the proper month, giving the illusion he saw 20+ women in one month, but I think that is trivial in the grand scheme.
.
Seems like the OP has been a member in very good standing for about a 1/4 of a century! So much so that he recently posted a pm that TER sent him commending the way he defended himself and then thanked him for being a member since their early days. To show their appreciation, they gifted him 100 days VIP. That's a damn nice thank you. lol.
.
I still see zero proof he fabricated any of the reviews and when you look at his case in its totality i.e. his own words in defense, his many white lists, TER taking his back etc I think the vast majority of evidence points to him being honest. Not sure why anyone is still questioning his legitimacy at this stage. His name has been drug through the mud enough, imo.
Robert, Thank you. I’ve put it to rest, TER has validated my reviews and my integrity and that’s good for me.
I believe we have a new disorder TERDS
THE EROTIC REVIEW DISORDER SYNDROME
symptoms include but not limited to:
Jealousy
Inferiority complex
Micropenis
Low Testosterone
Impotence
Infidelity
Bad Hygiene
If you are experiencing any of these please seek medical attention.
I share RR's view here
There are players on TER who have hundreds of reviews and some of them were notching their bedposts seemingly every other day. When I first stumbled on TER I went cuckoo for coochie--there were months when I was seeing 2 or 3 new girls a week. That's how I got to 120 reviews in just a few years, vacations, illnesses, repeats and long layoffs notwithstanding.
For the life of me, I don't understand why a high body count is now justification for contempt. If some Ace Ventura on here wants to contact each and every lady he's reviewed to determine whether he's telling the truth, have at it. Good luck with that. If not, you've made your suspicions known already; maybe just let it go now.
-- Modified on 2/17/2026 7:41:11 PM
I see how what I wrote could be misinterpreted. Let me be more clear.
- I think he saw all 20 women.
- I don't think he saw them all in the same month.
- I don't think TER should have allowed him to post all 20 in the same month, and should have forced him to put the correct month instead.
- I have my doubts that he saw all 20 within 3 months time and I feel he is gaming the system by dumping all 20 in same month when he probably saw them over the course of 6 months to a year.
I never said his reviews were fake. I think his multitude of lengthy replies defending himself creates more suspicion that he did not in fact meet all 20 within 3 months.
Just because someone has been in good standing for long time doesn't mean they will always be that way. I have heard from some girls that there are a couple of TER power reviewers throw their weight around and try to negotiate low-ball rates. At one point in time these bad actors were regular reviewers until they decided to use their review power to go bad. Rudy Giuliani is a great example of real life person who did good things once until he wasn't. I am not saying Bostonboy does either of these (the bad guys were in NYC), but we also shouldn't excuse questionable behavior just because they've been posting reviews for a long time.
And shouldn't he have gotten 300 VIP days for 20 reviews instead of 100?
That TER should change the rules for what they allow?
That you feel he was unduly rewarded 200 extra days of VIP? If this is the case, how did it impact your life? Are you 12?
He didn’t claim he saw them all in 3 months. In fact, he pointed out that the 3 months is a guide. The wording says should, not that it’s required. He admitted it was over more than 3 months.
As for the 100 days, that had nothing to do with the 20 reviews. That was separate. TER admin gave that to him for his response in the original thread he was attacked in.
Jumping in without reading everything that went down puts you at a disadvantage and makes you look bad. Food for thought.
How exactly would TER do this?
TER would go around polling 20 providers some of which might not even check anything on TER? And ask them about which month an anonymous nickname has seen them?
Do you realize how absurd that sounds?
Here's the thing, the month a review published really does not matter as long as it's within a reasonable time frame. Providers don't change much over three months. In fact as someone who reads historical reviews I find that many providers dot change much over years...
I have read a lot of reviews in my lifetime, but never have I read a review where the date or a month the monger saw the provider, made any difference.
Some mongers deliberately put the "wrong" month to avoid providers, especially low volume ones, figure out who the anonymous review is from.
And i don't see anything wrong with that
I would not even be able to name many of the providers I saw more than 3 months ago, much less 6 to 12 months ago, or recall where or (in may case what agency). Maybe you keep written notes or something or think he has a great memory.
I think you you don't want to trust the guy, don't, but this on-going argument about what he may or may not have done is low value and not helping improve anything. While I don't think it is possible to make anyone submit an honest, accurate or fair review we can perhaps encourage people to do things that help -- such as suggesting having put the actual month of the session in the review rather than ignoring/not thinking about that when writing the reviews. TER could, and may have -- we don't know how lone the approval process was or if the admin even asked about it.
But at the end of the day, the guy seems to have a long history those that need to can look at and make a call for themself. I don't think we should turn these discussion boards in to some court of popular opinion as this (and many other threads) seems to be turning into.
I didn't think my take on this would be so controversial so here goes trying to answer the previous nested replies.
Name-calling is a really effective way to win arguments btw.
My overarching reason to question his reviews is about review integrity and accuracy. If we are to complain about other less established reviewers or fake reviewers writing reviews to get VIP, then we should also be holding established reviewers to similar standards if it looks like they are gaming the system or doing something unusual. There should be more leeway because of their past contributions, but rules are still rules.
I can tell you from my own experience that I have had reviews denied because they were older than 3 months. And I learned that lesson to write any reviews within that period. So if in fact Bostonboy is posting reviews from more than 3 months ago, he shouldn't be allowed to get credit for them. Yes this is hard to police, but he actually made the case for them because it is unlikely that he met 20 girls in a single month. And some of those girls he reviewed are 1000-1500 per hour!
In terms of what I think TER should have done, is to view the volume of reviews within a single month with suspicion just as they would with a new reviewer. There are rampant fake reviewers especially in NYC and LA where they dump several reviews in a single month for the same girls. Not exactly the same but concept is similar, it's unlikely to meet that many girls in a single month at those rates. TER should be questioning the reviewer for proof of 20 meets in a month, not the girls.
Despite me saying what TER should have done, the reality is that they aren't staffed nor care enough to actually do that. It would be great if they had internal fraud alerts but I think that's a pipe dream since there are enhancement requests from 20 years ago still not acted on. Again I'll point to the rampant fake reviewers that they can't seem to stop. That doesn't mean it can't be called out in the forums though. People seem to be giving him an automatic pass for something that seems questionably done to get VIP days.
Okay, you have had reviews rejected because they are over 3 months. I'm sure that's because you used the drop down month box and selected the correct month, which was over 3 months ago. Since Bostonboy didn't change the month, his reviews were not scrutinized the same way yours were. I'm sure the fair police wouldn't be happy about this discrepancy. But let's let this one sink in. 3 months is rather arbitrary. If he remembers the details, does it really matter if it was actually 4 or 5 months ago? Is there a big difference there? Other then this being FAIR, what else is the real issue? Personally, I see none. And, I would suggest you don't worry so much about being honest with the exact month next time. Reviews help us all out. While I would be annoyed if someone snuck in a review that was years old and tried to pass it off as new, it being off by 1-3 months doesn't bother me. Rarely does much change in such a short time span.
As for your desire in a perfect world for TER to red flag any client who posts a large number of reviews in a given month, this is borderline terrible customer service. If the only issue is volume, harassing a reviewer is discouraging and may cause a reviewer not to post more reviews. I don't think Bostonboy needs the free VIP days. If he is seeing this many ladies at their price tags, even if it's over 6 months, I'm sure he has the coin to pay for TER. If everything else in the reviews seems legit, who really cares?
As you already pointed out, TER is likely not heavily staffed. They need to pick and choose their battles. Also, they rely on the community to help. It's why when I see things that are off, I submit a problem report. I don't just do it to report a profile that needs details updated. I do it if I think reviews are being falsified. What I would never do is if a client posted more reviews in a month than my wallet could handle. For all I know, he has the coin and went on a binger. It takes more than just volume to red flag a client. IMO, volume stands out a lot more when a new or fairly new provider gets a lot of reviews. It's not easy for providers to get reviews. But for an active TER member, submitting a lot is fairly simple.
You nailed all the salient points, saving me from another lengthy push back on J. I am fairly shocked at his continued takes in this thread as I have always viewed him as a guarded, fair minded, intelligent and knowledgeable poster. I really don't understand his absolute persistence in continuing to pick nits with a reviewer/topic that in the big picture, seems so incredibly minor. It almost feels personal for him at this point. I just don't get it. 
That’s where you are completely wrong, if you read the TER guidelines I was well in the timeframe of SHOULD post within 90 days, that’s SHOULD, not MUST, also since 75% of my reviews were providers I had visited and reviewed prior, they weren’t credited with VIP days, and I knew that because I know the guidelines. So what’s your reasoning now? Just because you don’t like the way TER allows a review to be posted shouldn’t make me a target of them being Fake. If I wanted to post fake reviews for credit I’d post reviews of women I hadn’t seen prior. What’s next you can’t possible afford to do this? Why how do you know who I am, what I do, I may have received a sizable inheritance, won the lottery, had Home Depot stock since the beginning, Apple Stock, a great 401k, pension, generational wealth, won a liability suit, etc. It’s my money and I can spend as I please. I’m
Single and have no other responsibilities or responsibilities to others other than myself. Gonna spend it before I die and hopefully I die fucking some provider in the Ass!
... Or NO review at all because it was a month away from 90 days allowed?
To me its clearly the former. I don't think this is gaming the system anymore than, say, people establishing their own standards for grading and not adhering to ter scale.
The reviews aren't there just to exist. They are actively helping other mongers. Some of us have to contact other mongers searching for data points from half a year or year ago.
Yes, I do get your point that it seems unfair that by folowing the rules to a tee, you are denied in writing a review, while someone else who "games the system" is not.
But again I would have to implore to look at the big picture. You review is most useful to someone when it exists (under the assumption that everything said in the review is truthful).
A review /mini of someone from half a year ago can and does help people.
If you knew the TER Guidelines, you’d know that reviewing a provider that you had seen before, and reviewed prior does not reward you with VIP days. So of the 20 over the period of June thru Sept about 5 were new providers I hadn’t seen or reviewed prior. So there’s that little piece of info, that debunks your theory.
Maybe if some of you spent this time instead of critcizing me on your wives and GFs maybe they’d give up their asses for you.
Ok BosBoy. Since you started this... the numbers are very suspicious IMO. 2025 must have been a very good year for you. 65 reviews implies $$$$$++. You had 30 reviews in 2020 (covid year) and average about 10 reviews in the years after and prior with some 20+ reviews. I'm guessing you don't have VIP and get free days with reviews. I think most of your reviews are legit as I see whitelists. This was a fun exercise for me as I do have lots of free time 
Keep on enjoying this hobby y'all...
Bravo to have that much stamina and endurance to shoot multiple shots that frequently, but maybe you should check with the women before you to say you cip, as some gals would want that private and not want the extra attention that they go bare with you if many of them let you.
You shouldn’t assume anything, I never said either way that I CIP, I don’t believe I’ve ever stated that spelled out or the acronym. You are inferring if I don’t mention a condom, one wasn’t used. If you need clarification you should message me, calling me out for what you assume, is in poor taste. I’m beginning to this community is made up of a bunch of aholes.
You are very explicit when a cover is used and when it isn’t whether it’s intentional or not. Yes, you don’t use acronyms, but sometimes girls (in general, or some of the girls you’ve seen) don’t want the unwanted attention whether you did bbfs or not. If you’re inferring that a cover is always used, then be consistent in your writing, as I’m not the only person who reads your reviews and questions this.
....why hide behind the alias when being critical of the work another member has done? Here's some advice for you when reading his reviews. Take it for what it is...one man's experience. If you have a question about a particular provider, simply send him a polite PM and thank him for his answer if he chooses to do so. Appreciate the effort he has put forth to make other's decisions and experiences better.
Thank you. I’ve never in all my years on TER have been scrutinised in this manner, and for nothing that goes against any of the guidelines set forth by TER. I’ve always responded in kind to those who have taken the time to ask a question about a review or a specific provider and even those that have criticized my reviews.
This is supposed to be to be a forum of help and information for the so called “hobbyists or mongers” to use as a guide in making a decision, not a place to bash someone because you have a differing opinion of how TER should enforce date and location. I’m not here to fuck a date or a location and if you are then you should seek some psychological help.
My reviews have been vetted and supported by TER itself, including the awarding of 100 VIP days. That alone should put to rest the claim that they are “fake.”
What is a "vetted" review? Do you mean "approved"? If so then all reviews are obviously approved and what automatically follows is the award of VIP days. This in itself hardly verifies that your reviews are real.
Y'all be tripping if you think this guy meet 20 girls in 1 month after 25 years in the hobby
You know that guy who walks into a debate, hears one thing, and quips something he feels clever about with a smug look on his face? That’s you right now. And you know when that guy does that and everyone else in the room is shaking their head because he legitimately sounded dumb for not really knowing the facts? Yeah, that’s you too. Before you say something else uninformed, you might want to catch up. Or, better yet, do what I usually do, decide you’re too late to the party and don’t say anything.
Actually over 40 years and it’s not. Hobby, it’s a lifestyle. You insult the providers when you call yourself a hobbyist. And who’s to say I can’t see 20 providers in a month. I’m nearly 60 and have great stamina, but maybe you have issues getting it up, I certainly don’t.
But if you had read the threads and the previous thread also this was over a 4 month period. Another bright individual who chooses to comment without all the facts or information. It’s funny because I’m sure a great deal of you “hobbyists” are doing this because your wives have lost interest in sucking your cock, or taking it in the ass. All that I hope is your wives are smart enough and sucking some BBC, swallowing that jizz and coming home and kissing you with the taste still lingering. I’m single and living my best life and enjoying what these beautiful woman offer with no guilt and regret.
Ok Mr big shot. Most of us have dumped loads in the same chicks as you. Calm down. 😂 you aren’t special
Never claimed to be. I only have to answer to TER.
For some reason you all think your opinion matters, who has the power trip? 😂
Good luck to you. Keep on having a good time. 🤛
challenge how often other guys see providers. It's a POV issue. In most cases, they do the math and wonder how the guy can afford it, and it usually has nothing to do with the physical demands of the sex. I know many over-60 guys who are married and can easily fuck their wives 20 times in a month, especially when she is younger, so what is the problem with it being 20 different women rather than one? A lot of this stems from something I have experienced here, too, and it boils down to jealousy of the higher volume mongers by lower volume mongers. For years, I would see three providers a week, and my reviews and posts on various boards discussing these ladies in detail backed it up. Into my 60's now, I have tapered off to one provider a week because I spend the other two times a week with my current girlfriend. I know many of the guys here that go on vacations to places where providers are abundant will spend two weeks seeing two girls, or more, per day. That's a way to get to 20 in half a month.
Just because you can't see YOURSELF hobbying the same way as someone else doesn't mean it's impossible.
Thanks, much appreciated. I actually coined a phrase in an earlier post. Jealously was top symptom.
THE EROTIC REVIEW DISORDER SYNDROME
symptoms include but not limited to:
Jealousy
Inferiority complex
Micropenis
Low Testosterone
Impotence
Infidelity
Bad Hygiene
If you are experiencing any of these please seek medical attention.
T.E.R.D.S. for short.
You've Streisand effected yourself with your repeated posts and insults
Your initial defense in different post was fine, but then you make multiple separate threads where you continue to defend your reviews and then start calling others names. Not a good look and makes it sound like you are guilty of what you are trying to defend yourself of.
Agree. I wonder if BB and Franc might be related?