TER General Board

Re: IF people are hydrated well, . . . .
holystonethedeck 91 Reviews 26 reads
posted

I've seen all kinds of conflicting information on this topic, including the article here.

 
I have to say that one thing that bothers me about this article is that it references women as "vulva owners". LOL

This is a pet peave of mine. I love women who squirt and when I do a search for squirters in Chicago, almost all the adds that say "squirter" have no reviews that contain the word squirt in them. I'm not going to search for other terms that might mean the same thing. I cannot read every review word for word. Fellas, if you want to include that action in your review, please use the actual word. Don't put it in your review if it didn't happen. Venting finished.

if it's more fluid than a tablespoon's worth, that's what it really is.  

I've been with a number of women, civie and provider, who squirt and I never got even a hint of urine odor or color.

there is often no odor or color, but it's a matter of scientific fact whether it's pee or something else and the difference can easily be ascertained by a layman (no pun intended).  If you had done a search, you would have found my prior posts on this subject.  Here's a link to one of them. . . .  

I've seen all kinds of conflicting information on this topic, including the article here.

 
I have to say that one thing that bothers me about this article is that it references women as "vulva owners". LOL

I have explained the science on several occasions, and the doctors that used to post here agreed with me, as well as inicky, who has spent as much of his life with his face in a pussy as anyone else here but doesn't need a snorkel.  I stand by the science . . . .  the only place near her girl-parts that can produce more than a few tablespoons of fluid is her bladder.  If you want to see the many discussions about this in the past, do a search with my name and "Skene's" and all of the threads should come up.  

 
With that said, we had a few girls in LA several years ago, who used to use the small rubber bladder used with the old "squirting ring" gag.  They would discreetly fill it with water, slip it into their pussy, let the customer DATY, start moaning and groaning, and they clamp their kegels closed and it would force the water out of the bladder and onto the monger's face.  It was an often-convincing simulation of a squirter and got them a lot of business.  The large number of reviews that said they were squirters is testimony to the skill and effectiveness of this scam.  

Rafl23 reads

I agree it’s piss. But you got some guys who think it’s some magical elixir.

Just to clarify . . . . "One man's piss is a gay man's magical elixir."  Lol

in the bathroom, "man's piss" comes from a man.  This may be a minor point for some.  Lol

One man's wine is another man's poison, it is clear that the wine in question is not the wine that the man necessarily made, but rather the wine that the man regards highly.

 
With that as a guide, my point should be clear.   I was not implying that the man who likes a woman's piss is gay.

(Not that there's anything wrong with that.)

seeking guidance from an idiom.  You should pick someone smart.  

I believe that should be:
"The problem is, you are seeking guidance from an idioM. You should pick someone smarM."
in juxtaposition to:
"The problem is, you are seeking guidance from an idioT. You should pick someone smarT."

Posted By: coeur-de-lion
Re: The problem is, you are . . . .
seeking guidance from an idiom.  You should pick someone smart.  
The actual problem is that mrfisher used the word "idiom" when he probably meant to choose from:
adage, aphorism, platitude, proverb, old saying, ...  
.
mrfisher, a self-admitted foodie, must certainly know about chicken catch a tory.

But that is a pun, a different thing from my idiom,, which is a phrase where the words establish a usage that is beyond or not deductible from the normal usage of the words.

 
This is different from an aphorism or the other suggestions you list as they do not generally contain that same use of words.

 
But I do enjoy this back and forth, nevertheless.

But I do enjoy this back and forth, nevertheless.
As have I, and maybe others. One of the better exchanges on the boards for quite some time.

he has had chicken-catch-a-tory rubbed all over him by a provider.
If not, it is one of a very few things he has NOT had rubbed on him.

Most sites that I searched called "One man's meat is another man's poison" a proverb. I found only one site that called it an idiom.  
.
Idiom: https://www.usingenglish.com/reference/idioms/one+man%27s+meat+is+another+man%27s+poison.html
Proverb:  
https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/one-mans-meat-is-another-mans-poison.html
https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/one+man%27s+meat+is+another+man%27s+poison
https://wordhistories.net/2017/05/07/one-mans-meat-is-anothers-poison/
and others.
.
Then I searched for the definition and grammar of idioms.  
Some consider that an idiom is a phrase (grammatically) and, therefore, does not contain a subject and verb.
E.g., "hard as a rock" is an idiom when describing a penis (and not describing an actual rock)
"bite the bullet" is to accept a bad situation bravely, such as when sending a deposit even after you swore that you would never, ever send a deposit.
.
But another treatment argues that an idiom CAN be a sentence (grammatically).
https://www.grammarly.com/blog/idioms/what-are-idioms/
That site goes on the say:
"Idiom vs. cliché
A cliché can be an idiom, but an idiom is not always a cliché."
.
"Idiom vs. proverb
A proverb is similar to an idiom in that its meaning can’t be deciphered by looking at the individual words, but it’s different because it’s used to give advice to someone else. If someone says, “Don’t cry over spilled milk,” they’re telling the other person not to worry about something that has already happened. The phrase doesn’t mean someone is crying and has nothing to do with dairy. So once again, a proverb can be an idiom, but an idiom is not always a proverb."  
.
I think that I was correct but being more precise by calling the expression mrfisher used a PROVERB.  
I think that mrfisher was correct but being more general by calling the expression he used an IDIOM.  
.
I think that this is something that might be called beating a dead horse but I also ask why let sleeping dogs lie? We can keep busy as a bee if we keep stirring up this hornet's nest even if it's at a snail's pace.

Posted By: mrfisher
Re: I do know the story of chicken-catch-a-tory....
But that is a pun, a different thing from my idiom,, which is a phrase where the words establish a usage that is beyond or not deductible from the normal usage of the words.  
   
   
 This is different from an aphorism or the other suggestions you list as they do not generally contain that same use of words.  
   
   
 But I do enjoy this back and forth, nevertheless.
"It takes more than wishes to do the dishes."

http://www.science.org/content/article/watch-how-alchemists-found-new-element-pee
Watch: How alchemists found a new element in pee
[click on embedded link for video]
"... Seventeenth century alchemists thought urine, with its golden color, might help them turn other substances into gold. ..." Many years later, Providers figured out how to turn pee into gold by calling it squirt.
.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hennig_Brand
Hennig Brand (1630-1710)
"... Like other alchemists of the time, Brand searched for the "philosopher's stone", a substance which supposedly transformed base metals (like lead) into gold. By the time his first wife died he had exhausted her money on this pursuit. He then married his second wife Margaretha, a wealthy widow whose financial resources allowed him to continue the search. Around 1669 he heated residues from boiled-down urine on his furnace until the retort was red hot, where all of a sudden glowing fumes filled it and liquid dripped out, bursting into flames. ..."  
.
The second wife is alleged to have confronted Hennig. "I'm really impressed with the glowing fumes that burst into flames but why don't you  use your own pee instead of using MY money to pay Providers to pee for you? And why does it take three hours in the bedroom to produce such a small amount of pee?"
.
http://www.mediamatic.net/en/page/232649/urine-and-philosopher-s-stone
Urine and philosopher's stone. How the search for gold led alchemists to discover something else
.
"... The “golden age of alchemy”, which fell on 13th-17th centuries, resulted in numerous alchemical treatises, created by medieval scholars, venturing clergymen and mysterious kabbalists.  ..."  
.
One badly faded manuscript might have said, "Thou shouldest pursueth Alchemy as a means to discovereth hot young pussy on the sideth withoutest thy wife becoming enraged with jealousy. Just telleth thy wife that thou art searching to converteth thy Provider's urine into gold and must pleasureth each other in the process."

Posted By: Rafl
Re: Try "pee", because . . . .
I agree it’s piss. But you got some guys who think it’s some magical elixir.
Whose great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandfather might this be:

Real "squirting" is usually only a tablespoon or two. Anything more than that is likely pee IMO.

The "squirt" effect is mostly caused by something blocking the liquid flow (peen/finger/hand/toy/tight kegal). This also makes it seem like a lot more liquid than it really is.

Squirt fluid will not make your skin itch/irritated the way pee does, and sometimes can have a bit of a floral scent.

-- Modified on 3/16/2025 4:22:39 PM

Most women think piss is squirting. I can’t squirt, but continue to try. I gladly offer my sweet golden nectar. Champagne 🥂 wishes & caviar dreams sold here. lol Smile 😊 for me!

I think it was a couple years after I became a companion that I first started squirting. My advice is to also take into consideration what providers have to say about themselves. Personally, I'd never sell myself as providing a specific service or experience if I didn't. Doing so is short-sighted and leads to confusion or disappointment.  

 
If a companion says in her ad that she squirts, likely she does. Other ways to double check include watching her content on fans / clips sites if she's on any of those. If a provider has a profile on content selling / camming platforms and she's a squirter, I bet you'll find videos of her squirting. All the best with your search.

But in fact there are girls who market themselves as squirters who really are not. One of my favorites was renowned for squirting but admitted privately to me that it was really pee. Another favorite didn't really advertise as a squirter but gushed a clear, viscous fluid that was certainly not piss. So there's that.

This post is spot on. If the provider squirts, say it in the review, especially when you are the first reviewer. If you are not the first address the profile- is she did not squirt, so state. "YMMV as she not not squirt for me" is useful. Very frustrating to search for squirt and then read 10 reviews where it is not mentioned. Then I have to pm the reviewer to confirm if it happened.

Same goes for "really bi." To me it means the girls at least kiss each other and, hopefully DATY. Please state if this happened; I love 4 handed massages and tag team as well, but if I read "really bi" I want to know the degree of interaction.

Thanks!

Urinating during my orgasms actually detracts from my actual orgasm. I've tested it multiple times by drinking a lot of water prior.  

Squirting is almost all urine and happens to some women when they orgasm when various pressure points are pressed. If a woman squirts/urinates at the same time she orgasms, there is a bit of creamy orgasm fluid which comes from the PTS gland but it's nearly all urine.  They've done medical studies on women now to prove that fact.  There is a urology study conducted by scientists using dye that was conducted and I have attached the link to the study below.

It’s also mentioned in Men’s Journal in an article entitled "10 Things  you see in Porn that don't Happen in Real Life."

Register Now!