Well, it appears I was correct in not publicizing my "adventurous" encounter to satisfy a curiosity. I thought health concerns would be the issue; in this community I never thought it would be philosophy; even just a couple isolated playtimes. I'm curious about something else; with the high prevalence of ladies here that like to play with other ladies (Amanda?) are we seeing a double standard where girl-on-girl is OK but guy-on-guy, or guy-on-TS is not? How about post-op TS? I actually inadvertently had an experience with that a few years back. I didn't find out until later & trust me, it's hard to tell.
This is posted under an alias to protect myself if what I've heard is true. I've heard that many ladies will not see a client that has played with a TS Provider. What are your feelings?
I've been "curious" & actually twice saw a T-girl in my home city. She was clean & very feminine (a requirement for me) with natural breasts & is living life as a female. "P-stick" was passive (hormones) but I tried & found I could perform oral & was pretty good at it, lol. She was incapable of "topping" but allowed protected (with condom) anal penetration. I found it pretty exciting & satisified my curiousity & actually when I tried a second visit it didn't have the same effect although I still enjoyed it but after I left was just a little turned off about it & haven't been back. I promise you if you saw this lady, you would not distinguish her from a natural female until panties came down; even if you saw her driver's license, which I did.
I did not do a review because of fear of being shunned by female providers - and I doubt I'll do it again. I have talked about it with a couple providers I trust & they were cool with it & commended me on being willing to adventure.
this is not the PC answer, but i would not see a gent who had been with a TS, any more than i would be with a client who had at some time in the past been with another male. health risks would have nothing to do with it, it would simply be a matter of political/psychosexual disagreement.
Thanks for the honesty, I'm more thinking of fear of health risks & hadn't really though of the "political/psychosexual" aspect. I suspect that would not be the issue with the vast majority of providers.
...heck, I have quite an affinity for MtF transgendered folks, myself. There are certain men I will not see if they reference certain girls who I know to be crack addicts and/or the type who will offer anything unprotected for the right price, but not because they are TS girls. One of my fantasies is to find a gentleman who requests the company of both myself and a t-girl.
Thanks, the problem there would be to find a t-girl to play with you. For the most part they consider themselves straight women that only like men; but what you suggest WOULD seen fun
....I just choose to not play with bisexual males in my personal as well as professional life. And yes, I view guys who see TS providers as bi or bi-curious.
Well, it appears I was correct in not publicizing my "adventurous" encounter to satisfy a curiosity. I thought health concerns would be the issue; in this community I never thought it would be philosophy; even just a couple isolated playtimes. I'm curious about something else; with the high prevalence of ladies here that like to play with other ladies (Amanda?) are we seeing a double standard where girl-on-girl is OK but guy-on-guy, or guy-on-TS is not? How about post-op TS? I actually inadvertently had an experience with that a few years back. I didn't find out until later & trust me, it's hard to tell.
...but girl-on-girl bisexuality is socially more acceptable than guy-on-guy bisexuality. Our society allows ladies the luxury of being bisexual but expects males to choose to be either straight or gay. Whether it's right or wrong, sorry it's just the way it is.
"with the high prevalence of ladies here that like to play with other ladies".......LOL, it's called 'bi-for-hire'!!! Unfortunately a very large number of the ladies on this site who are listed as 'bi' are actually just 'socially bi'(if the price is right). Meaning if they are in that setting they are open to it, but it is something that they would never seek it out on their own, not truly bisexual.
And as for me and my original post, well I never stated what my reasoning was or gave any insight, I merely stated that I personally choose not to be sexually involved with bi-males. ...So based on the limited amount of insight, you can't really make any assumptions.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
