These are my top 5 that I’ll drive by and see what’s up but yet my opinions on each of them.  

Girls on Eros without reviews are every bit as risky as BP or CL once were, I only look there when following a link from a reputable review, and NEVER use it any more as a starting point and I haven't done so in well over a decade.

Agree 100% with your outlook on P411. EROS wasn’t that bad until they changed their format, don’t know if it was for legal reasons or what, but they used to have the ability to click on the providers links to their websites that added a little more validity to the girls. If you don’t have a website, I don’t even consider. You have to do your best to vet them as they do with us. LE for the most part isn’t going to create a beautiful website and use that as bait.  

TER. I read the newest reviews in my area every day and add any lady I think I’ll enjoy to my favorites. When I get horny I go through my favorites and start sending messages. I also look at Neurotic Donkey and Private Delights, but I rarely see a lady who doesn’t have a good review history on TER. Lastly I keep my eyes on the KAgencies to see if they have any top talent in town.

Switter started out as a kind of wild west of postings but eventually turned into a BP hybrid primarily for travelling providers. All in all pretty useless.  

Is weird because i had an invitation from SA to create my profile there to the e-mail that i use for escort biz, but i got a ban coz i'm an escort. So i never got why they invited me, what thye were expecting invinting escorts and don't permit escorts. Is like a joke.

Nice thing about p411 is that when providers log in, it puts their name to the top of the list.  So you can see who is literally active that day.

My bet is that they invited you by accident, or at least not knowing that your true profession, even if prostitution isn't technically illegal in the country that you live.

But the trick is to channel all sites including Slixa, Tryst to find that Gem. Even SA can lead you a great find,again with a lot of mixing and matching although now there's more work involved.
But I loved the old SA, it was more direct, you can see what the young lady was really all about. You could basically proposition her and tell her what your deal was. I met a few and had a great time. But the site has changed, due to the new laws. Funny is that I was a bit too aggressive on that site, someone may have complained and now I've been banned for the past couple of years.  
But now I see mostly girls I've met before. Trying t keep it simple. I don't have the "Balls Out" approach as I use to. Getting old sucks...lol

I got kicked off once due to a chick complaining about mentioning ppm rate.  But managed to get on again with a new account.  However that was all before the new laws.  Not sure what would happen if I tried now.  My second iteration lapsed.   Some day I might try again.  Sort of settled on pros for the time being, a lot less monkeying around just to get a fuck.

I book 95% of the time from agency sites, and 5% from P411 and TER; Elitemodels.es Privateliaisons.info XOC Tysons-girls Jennifersmodels THEN K-Agencies AsianGems.live Clubparadiseusa DiscreetStory  

Eros stopped all of us who advertise on their site cannot add our website links to any of our ads there.
it is a bummer and makes the guys have to ask or research on his own if a provider has a website.
Majority of gents they find me in order of ad site responses: Tryst,Eros,Twitter/P411,every now and then here on TER , RS2k,and switter.
It just depends on which city/coast I am traveling to as some sites are used more often than others.

mmmmm.... i don't think so, if you send spam with your website promotion to an e-mail [email protected] you must to have clear idea about what world wide escort what it means. I had the same experience with other site Travel Girls.

P411 all the way.  If and when travel resumes, I may try agency again.

Yup, me here doing the same as yours except the K-girls agencies as they are not too welcome new members even with plenty credentials.