-- Modified on 10/3/2020 12:01:15 PM

I don't recall meeting or having a session with a "Low TER reviewed lady"  before...if she was rated low then I probably wouldn't have seen her. But.....
Now, I'm gonna go on record here...it'll be a cleansing of my conscious or as I call it my Jesus Moment...Shit,I figure it'll be cheaper then therapy...lol
I met this young lady years ago. We didn't click, it wasn't a horrible session but it was like mixing oil and water.
I gave her a not so cool review....In time I felt kinda bad about it and I knew if we met under different circumstances ,that I really felt that we would have a better time. Now,I saw her at her apt in So Cal. She's now in Vegas which is where I think we would have been more relaxed...and have a better time. My opinion.
So a few years ago I reached out to her while in Vegas....Her reply was basically......GO FUCK YOURSELF....lol.
Anyways...that's my confession...whew I feel good.....Praise the lord...lol

He was a little older than me. He said "I don't even buy green bananas anymore."  We both laughed but it did make me think. Life is just too fucking short for "do-overs" with a girl who didn't bring it the first time.  A few weeks ago I saw a lady who merited a 3 or 4 in performance. That was her one chance on this plane of existence. In more direct answer to your question I'm just not seeing anyone to whom I didn't give at least an 8 (7 for massage).

And think of poor CDL who has to look back on his 1,000 kgirls.

Of the 100+ providers I have seen, I rarely look at overall score,  but I can't imagine that any have an average appearance score below 8. Since there are a lot of fbsm girls on my list,  those max 7 performance scores could drag an average for a repeatable gal  
 under 7.... So 7.4 is my answer.

Atleast in my book isn't worth a repeat! Now granted some reviews I see of a 6 performance wise seems to be more of a 5 in some cases but are trying to be nice about it.

Anything truly under a 6 why on earth would you repeat?

Just my thoughts ...

A few years back, there was a lady out of LA/Van Nuys area named Kathy. LA old timers will know EXACTLY who I'm talking about. Her appearance rating was rarely over 6, they were mostly 4's. But her performance were in the 8, 9's. She had a following and her reviews were worth the price of the VIP service. They were some of the funniest reviews posted. Most felt like shit after seeing her but they always went back...and always left vowing never to return,,,but they did.
I never saw her, i couldn't handle the mental affects afterwards

-- Modified on 10/3/2020 8:11:27 PM

I would say a 6.5 overall rating.

Strong physical attraction to certain members of the fairer sex is something that I've never been able to ignore.  That's why I saw her in the first place.  I gave her the highest performance rating allowed by TER, which didn't even come close to expressing how much I enjoyed the visit.  Being someone who has for a long time had difficulty reaching orgasm in the allotted time, she coaxed one out of me.  One of the hottest, sexiest gals I've ever met in the hobby.  Gone for a long time now it would appear, but if you are reading this Shay, I'd see you again in a heartbeat.

-- Modified on 10/4/2020 8:03:32 AM

If the reviews say that those are not available I wouldn't see her.

If she provided those activities hem and she was a 5 or 6 in looks, I would give her a try when I am younger.

Now I am more selective as to whom I see. 8's for me.

Agree with this.. Especially more so with the performance aspect!

Would render a pass from me. I prefer to choose ladies who score in the 8's for the most part. I do read reviews, both good and bad for any lady im considering attempting to meet. But, I really try to read between the lines on those reviews.

Since a lot of reviews are embellished, or overly critical, I try to take that stuff into consideration. A bad review from someone may be accurate, but theres always that ymmv factor to consider. So if she has relatively good reviews from others, but a bad one from one or two, I tend to chalk that up to either a bad day, or something about that reviewer didn't bring out the best in her.

Then I just have to decide if I feel I may get a better result, or if I might suffer the same fate as the lower scoring reviewers.

When traveling was safe, I used to visit a certain city in the Midwest.  Surfing P411 I found a provider which appeared interesting.  On TER her reviews for performance were 9's and 10's.  Looks, 4 and 5.  So I decided to take a spin.

With make up, the lady in question would look stunning, but she did not wear make up.  No turning heads our questions in the lobby, which I think is why she was make up free.

In the bedroom, OUTSTANDING!  For a couple of years when I was in her town, I would only see her.  She even offered to bring her BF for a little MFM action but I was into it.  

I would imagine this experience might be the exception to the rule.  

But like you and unlike CDL I don't have the slightest idea what their review scores are because like you I rarely if ever even look at the overall score as there are just so many members of the OTHFBC with "average overall scores" well into the nines. Women that I honestly couldn't give more than a five to on the GaGa scale, some who shouldn't be getting anything more than a five even on the much easier TER scale. lol

 
That said, I do pay attention to "bad reviews" and it doesn't take more than a couple of bad reviews to chase me off what with literally thousands of "well reviewed" women to choose from. Like you I can't really imagine that I have seen many women from TER who don't have at least an average of 8+ or any with an average of less than 7.

 
As for performance, I don't care about Greek or being bi or doing gang bangs, but I won't knowingly see a woman who won't DFK or who gives CBJ's, so every woman I would book with has to at least 'qualify" for a 9, which means by TER standards any woman who can be scored as a 9, but is only getting on average something in the 7's is a provider who doesn't seem to be "clicking with" her reviewers.

 
I  guess after putting some thought into it, I guess my minimum number is pretty close to yours, although for different reasons. I would put my minimum number at around 7.5, although I have ZERO idea what my actual minimum score that I HAVE seen actually is, I am willing to bet it's probably lower than that 7.5 over a period of the 16 years or so that I have been here, but how much lower I don't actually know, nor do I plan on researching to find out. lol

if you're going to go back and review all those girls again TODAY. LOL

 
Not quite what the OP was asking though. So I think the question is really about performance. Maybe break up the questions into a) what is the lowest score you would give in looks and STILL stay and complete the session and b) what is the lowest score in performance you would give and STILL return for another session in the near future.

 
I don't know about others but I pretty much ignore a review that is more than a year old, I would even questions my own review and know I was, to a certain extent, TOFTT if I were to see one of the providers I saw back in 2017 again now.

Can you even imagine what a Tijuana hooker who is old enough to have worked as a hooker 46 years ago would rate today? I would expect she would be in "negative" numbers. lol

 
I have seen just how fast some women decline, especially the ones who keep late night hours. I was going to the Hotel Del Rey about once a month or more seeing the same women working there for well over a decade. I still remember fresh young things, barely old enough to be there the first time I saw them and then only 2-3 years later seeing how old, jaded and burnt out they would look, even chicas barely 21 years of age, but who had been as the saying goes, "ridden hard and put away wet" lol

Wow!  She must be over 65 by now.  Lol

If I was better at them I might drop a "your mama" joke on that opening. But I'll leave that alone.