Hello.

There’s no way I’m being anyone’s slave. Not here and not likely.

However I love sharing some elements of being intimately dominated with very select, long term trusted regulars.

Do you think that counts as PstarE? Choking , spanking, rough two on two, grabbing/pinning down, dirty talk, restrained to be banged?

"trusted long term regulars", as you state, then you should NOT mention it in any of your ads or other marketing as this will attract people who want this, but whom you may not feel like participating with, thus leading to bruised feelings and all the ills that will engender.

Is "Sensual Domination", where the focus is on pleasure, not pain or humiliation.  However, I would not include choking or spanking in that category.  Those can get out of control and be both painful and dangerous.  With spanking, you don't want welts on your ass from a customer that are still there for the next customer, nor do you want welts on the ass of a customer who has to try to hid them from his wife or SO.  Sensual Domination usually includes restraints, teasing and edging at a minimum and some toy play if you are feeling more adventurous.  

Absolutely correct.

(Except for dirty talk, which in my view is part of a regular encounter.)

Beautiful.

Thank you, that will be kept in mind.

Thank you

Ive done most of that except MFM.  But with sugar babes rather than pros. It's a lot of fun. It does take a few sessions to build up trust and get to the rougher things. I think it is beyond PSE. I can see where it would be challenging to offer it to the general public.

Oh yes! Thank you for pointing out sensual domination vs. what is typically considered domination/ps e. I enjoy those!!!

I guess with the typical basic things like spanking/choking for shorthand domination have a different response than with sensual... they lean more towards providing an adrenaline spike and sensual... it’s still domination but it’s much safer like you mentioned. Both ways provide greater excitement than what is in a “vanilla” service, and they have to be done with someone trustworthy. With the sensual kind a bond/attachment isn’t all that necessary.

I wouldn’t trust someone to spank if they were going to leave welts, unless they were ok with scheduling in the inconvenience of my booty healing from them afterwards!

Yeah, as much fun as these activities are to do all the time (omg what a dream)...

It’s probably a good idea to profile who is going to have their hands on my throat. LOL. The highs are real, but they can go from good to bad within minutes. The everyone involved needs to know when to stop and prevent hurting others permanently.

And if you were talking about the 18-19yo part-time sugar babies, I wouldn’t recommend them going into anything BDSM related unless they demonstrate core competencies and having a enough grown up common sense. Luckily I had an 2.5 decades-experienced SD show me EVERYTHING at that age... yet I still have a lot of adulting to do. Having someone CARE is important, so when things go wrong they’re not going to drop their responsibilities of providing that kind of high. Not only using my discretion, the other person needs to be accountable for themselves and see that I’m mentally sound enough to give them the green light.

And when they do, I’m flattered to know than I’m not too much of an immature coo coo head. :————-) And that I’ve given my trust to someone who deserves it.

that offer sensual domination to the customer, where the customer is the submissive party.  It sounds like you want to be the sub.  I agree that's not something you should offer to a new client, because you may still find yourself in restraints and totally at the mercy of a guy you don't really know.

Love it both ways! But yes that makes sense.

Chicks BDSM interests are stronger once they reach their 30's and beyond.  It's somewhat more rare for 19 yo's to be deep into kink although some are from a much earlier age.  So never say never.  In fact my first submissive was in fact a 19 yo, who grew up as the daughter of missionaries to Africa, etc.
.
My kind of "rough" sex is about as authentic as WWE.  It's all role play, even though it suggests some dark stuff, there's never any real damage inflicted.   That's partly because the chicks I've dealt with never requested real damage -- though there are obviously those types out there as well.  I think my level is the one the OP is getting at.  Not the hard core stuff.

And to fix my message when it comes out of moderation, I see you are the OP (original poster.)

Only 30% of people prefer to be only dominant in BDSM.  About 50% want to be submissive only.  The others are okay as either.  That skews even more so for females who much prefer the submissive role.  (On reason dominant providers can make buck is because the demand is high and the supply is short.)

An intriguing observation! Maybe I’ll go find some kinky girlfriends on Fet in the their 30’s.  

But yeah... where do you find them? Lol I want some.

And you sound sane, safe and fun. Everyone has their own preference on how hard to go... not really into hard whips, more like soft leather floggers, controlled, light -moderate pain and roughness.

The roughness can be such a turn on...  can’t deny.

Where did this come from?

You’re right, Dommes are precious. 💎  

I can’t be one though! Even if I tried!

Stretch your acting wings!  And get paid for it!