Early in my hobby career, I visited LA and saw a provider with great BP ads, lots of photos and very professionally done in every way. Long story short, the provider I saw was the person in the pictures but the pictures were either very old or very misleading. She was far older than pictured, far baggier, varicose veins and all. To make matters worse, the experience was awful. When I hadn't come after her two Os, she essentially made me beat off to completion rather than go on. Needless to say, I was anxious to rip her a new one in a review but was sorely disappointed when my review was rejected due to this delisting thing. Having not read all of TER's fine print, it was my first encounter with this concept.
Anyways, this provider continues to advertise a lot and has even more pictures that are, if anything, even more misleading. Every time I see them, I just get pissed off. I've actually thought about spending the $3 to post some warning ads on BP, but I assume it's not such a good idea. I post this thread just for the sake of discussion.
-- Modified on 10/11/2010 7:21:52 PM
The way I see it, when you decide to see a lady with no TER reviews you should understand that what happened to you is a very likely possibility.
Not recommending it, but apparantly if you drop say $30 for 10 ads, you'll make a huge impact on her without even revealing yourself. Just info, not a suggestion.
HalfHour
You state:
'When I hadn't come after her two Os she essentially made me beat off to completion rather than go on.'
Dude, you really believe she had 2 Os? She was faking it to try and get you to cum.
I am constantly amazed how many of you really think you gave a girl (and a working girl at that)an orgasm. It is much, much harder for a woman to cum than a man, yet many men assume we are like them and can cum easily.
I all but guarantee that 99.99% of you who think we came, or think you can tell the difference between real or fake are being played.
No matter what the women who will inevitable post here with "speak for yourself, I almost always cum with my clients" most times we fake it to help you along or to be polite and play to your fantasies.
In the civie world and especially in the P4P area men are usually clueless about the female orgasm. Your egos and cluelessness are the only reason you believe you make women cum. I smile to myself when I read my reviews and they say something like "there's no way she faked that! I gave her several O's" when the truth is almost none have made me have an orgasm.
I must say it depends on the person. If I feel a connection with the person....and he has a good size and know how to work it, yes I have definitely achieved my O's.
And lets not forget, most guys do oral because that gets the provider off, that way they don't have to work as hard otherwise, which is smart and works most of the time.
Isn't an orgasm by oral an orgasm? You just shot holes in the the alias provider's theory.
1. "Mr Doofus"-----dude, when you saw the photos were misleading, why didn't you just split instead of having such a miserable time ?
2. "WhatThe Hell"----should be renamed WHAT The Fuck-------lady, your bitter & cynical attitude leads me to believe you should seek a career change more in line with your personality------
how about a matron in an all female prison ?
1. "Mr Doofus"-----dude, when you saw the photos were misleading, why didn't you just split instead of having such a miserable time ?
Like I said in my post, I was pretty much a newbie at that time. It was definitely a learning experience, and I would now echo your words of advice. That doesn't mean I can't be pissed off when I continue seeing her deceptive ads.
Where did I say I do not like my job or my clients? I let them think they are the best lovers in the world, that is part of the job.
Seems to me I hit a nerve with you, my dear. You must want to keep living the fantasy long after the fact.
What an angry man you are
& don't jump to conclusions about me----Im far too "complex" to be figured out by the likes of you------
Lastly, if you like your job & clients SO much , why are you posting your frigid, bitter & cynical screeds under a chickenshit alias ?
Talk about a rhetorical question----------
You don't know shit about me.
And I post under an alias because little minds with big egos like yours take offence at the first sign of honesty.
To make you happy let me amend my statement:
Priapus is the ONLY man on Earth who can make any and every woman cum at the mere sight of him.
Happy now?
While I disagree with her assessment of Pria as an "angry man" I agree with her about providers and orgasms overall.
I posted extensively on why, for evolutionary and other reasons, she is correct. Rather than repeat that data, I've included a link here for those who are interested.
Obviously, that doesn't apply in all cases as there are providers who have the luxury of specifically selecting men for chemistry, attractiveness, etc. But for the typical provider who, according to LG's survey sees 120+ new clients yearly, has 400 appointments and has seen 860+ clients ... yes, I believe my assessment of the unlikelihood of orgasm with a client is correct except in rare cases.
Just my opinion, John, but she comes off as bitter & cynical; as another poster stated, she seems to have a clear disdain for hobbyists that may extend to her clients, hence her alias.
John, I didn't get off the boat yesterday-------I know providers "big O's" are an act in many cases------but if one is going to be SO sour about this "grand illusion",it'd be a good idea to get out of the hobbying profession.
she seemed to be stating her case rather neutrally, i thought.
He is the one who sees something that isn't there, thus my calling him and angry man.
I had zero distain or hatred at all in my intentions when I posted that. It is a simple fact that women have a much harder time cumming. It is also a fact that most men think they make us cum. Where is the cynicism in the truth?
I happen to really like my clients by the way
calling him an angry man is the same thing he did to you.
now i suppose that turn about IS fair play, but i need significantly better evidence that "mind reading" like that is a "good thing".
AFAIK neither of you is gifted with super powers.
it is common in the US to accept "mind reading" pronouncements and diagnoses of others problems as polite discourse. i'll indulge on occasion myself, mostly as "push back". but frankly i long for more civilized lands where it is not acceptable adult behavior. maybe it is time for me to consider a trip abroad to refresh myself....
I've lived abroad. If you find a truly civilized society let me know. Maybe we can go there together
And, if you read his posts it is obvious that he is angry that I popped his fantasy bubble. So yes, he is angry about that, not in general. I should have been more specific.
Have a great day!!
WhatTheHell
(who has super powers!)
and just who the fuck said that it is harder for a woman to cum than a man? As I have gotten older it is a rare ocassion that I cum before my sexual partner.
super powers my fucking ass
With my super powers I see that you are in the camp of orgasm believers. They are a hard group to convince
It is fact that it is harder for a woman to cum. Fact.
Read John's post.
FACT.
Dream well tonight!
and discovered some places where to my immense surprise i was more free there. i found that the locals were also more free to be... well... eccentric.
in the US we think we have the right to get into other peoples minds and psychoanalyze them without their paying a fee and asking for the service.
Book the tickets and let's get eccentric
i have a medical issue to attend before i run off to play. possibly surgery possibly just a lifestyle adjustment. 'til it is settled tex isn't playing except on the boards.
now charming as your suggestion is..... i have to say i haven't done a blind date in well over 40 years.
I sincerely wish you the best of luck with your health issues, textcat.
Let me know when we can run away together
This technique of psychoanalyzing someone with whom we disagree is called "psychopathologization of dissent" and is an outgrowth of Critical Theory invented by Antonio Gramsci and popularized as an approach by the Frankfurt School.
It is a particularly nasty sort of ad hominem that is largely effective.
Let me give a couple of examples -- I'll give them from both sides of the political spectrum just to keep this off the P&R board.
Pretend I want state-funded healthcare. My reasons might be humanitarian in nature or quite practical, understanding that making preventative care more widely available could reduce aggregated costs later.
Someone disagrees with my advocacy. Instead of debating the facts -- for example, the cost differentials, or the philosophy -- whether or not he should be taxed to pay for someone else's healthcare; he instead says: "You want DEATH PANELS! You want government bureaucrats choosing who gets to DIE! You are no better than a NAZI!"
Notice that the person who disagrees with me is projecting what *I* want -- making it up as he goes along. Now, instead of debating the issue, we are debating whether or not I'm essentially a psychopathic killer.
Pretend I want shall-issue concealed carry laws. My reasons might be so that the porrest among us who have to wait 20 minutes for police to arrive when they call have access to self-defense, or it might simply be adherence to the Constitution's intent as I understand it.
Someone disagrees with me. Instead of debating facts, s/he instead points out that kids sometimes get hold of improperly stored guns and accidentally harm or kill themselves and therefore I *must* want shall-issue laws because I want babies to be killed. "You want babies to die! You want a return to the Wild West! You want carnage in the streets!"
Again, the person is projecting what *I* want in the most unfavorable fashion possible.
This technique is so widely employed in politics and so ubiquitous on television and talk radio that we do it almost automatically without ever considering its origin or purpose.
The PURPOSE of psychopathologization of dissent and critical theory is NOT to arrive at truth or workable solutions. The purpose is rather to WIN AT ALL COSTS by using social pressures of various sorts caused by the psychopathologization of dissent to neutralize and eliminate your opposition.
Usually this entails what I would call "effortless virtue." That is, by convincing others that mere BELIEF or expression of IDEAS in one way or another makes someone essentially a "good person." Thus, a person holding the right belief can feel self-righteously superior to those holding the "wrong" belief; and excoriate them without penalty.
Either way, we adopt this approach quite widely in the Western world -- and do so in an automatic and transparent way, often unthinkingly releasing an ideological WMD intended to harm and destroy rather than build wellbeing.
and i loathe it. the effective use of it is why i loathe political ideologues of every stripe. it has replaced rational political discourse with socially pernicious and ultimately self-destructive vitriol.
i am not above it, either. i will not make first use, though. having the option of use in kind as a deterrent seems to be a necessary adaptation. at least that's my fig leaf. most of the flame wars here have a similar dialectical structure.
the only consolation is that it is usually self destructive. in that, the winners are only short term winners. long term they are revealed as fraudulent clueless opportunists. when i use that kind of rhetoric or point out its use, my intent is not to win but rather simply to keep the wolves at bay. i don't want to "lose" without it being a Pyrrhic victory for the winners.
How any guy can write that he gave a woman 2 orgasms vaginally while he is still pounding away, and BELIEVE it, is beyond me.
But maybe the suspension of disbelief should not be tampered by telling the truth on the board. Guys want to feel like a land baron with their little ol' timeshare.
HalfHour
It is a fantasy so there is nothing *wrong* in believing it. But it is kind of amusing. That was all I meant, but as you can see many men do not want the truth.
When your reviews are terrible, delisting yourself is the way to go. Erase the evidence of how badly you *suck* - take that with or without cheesy pun.
I wouldn't waste my money bashing her on BP. Most will assume you're a rival provider trying to pour salt on the competition anyway. Sometimes you just gotta let shit go and cut your losses, nothing to be done. Eventually her rep will catch up to her and she'll have to move around to keep playing the same game...granted, in a city the size of L.A., it may take a while.
providers delist themselves for various reasons...some of them simply do not want to be part of TER, that does not mean they are ripoff or bad providers. Many high-end distance themselves from the review systems and still they are great.
No WhatTheHell, Priapus has got you pegged. You don't say you dislike your clients but the tone of your message reveals a lot about you.
You take obvious glee at taking a shot at the hobbyists here and at men in general and all from behind an alias. Obviously you know if your “clueless” clients saw your post your business would dry up faster than the time it takes to read this post. You are in a service industry and you would seem to hold your customers in disdain. It’s time to move on then.
Obviously a lot of providers fake it as not every client matches what they actually need to get off. I have been with providers who’s attempts at moans of ecstasy make me roll my eyes at the poor acting but occasionally you do meet someone where a connection is made the providers orgasm’s are genuine.
Unfortunately, another hobbyist ( PanAmalong )--------seems to be "cutting & pasting" several of my posts together to portray me as a hypocrite----------was he put up to this ?--------
My reply shows up before the original discussion! Checked my settings and my time zone was off. My bad.
... belong on the P&R board. Maybe you, Mein and I can cut out cool tinfoil hats together?
Seriously, though -- I can understand why you'd see her posts in the way you see them; but I see them more as a PSA.
After all, informing hobbyists that they are faking it is not in a provider's best interests because it can inadvertently raise the performance bar.
I mean, looking at the post of mine that I linked ... you must imagine that there are a couple of providers out there who wouldn't exactly be anxious to see me. LOL
If you saw a running blender, would you put your dick in it and then sue the blender manufacturer or the electric company for your injury?
This was a blatant and gross B&S, not even a "kinda B&S)"... and you stayed.
Dude, the shit is on you now, and she's laughing all the way to the bank. Don't get pissed at her (yes, bad behavior) for your stupidity and your participation. Man up and take ownership of how foolishly you acted. When you can do that without getting all worked up about it, THEN you can decide what you want to do.
Transaction declined
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!