To convince a guy to make a decision to see someone?  Do the guys think that the more explicit the pictures are, the more mileage you will get in a session?  Obviously we want to look at more... but that's not the point of this question.  Will you see the provider with just one good pose, naked or not?  And how important is it to see the face?  Is a body shot enough?

Must see the face!  Tits, ass and legs shot also! or no money for the honey!

One full body shot face on - in a bathing suit or bikini... and the second from the side -
In both shots they should be standing.  

Harder to disguise the body shape in this type of shot.  Face is not that important - so blurred or not - the bod and description will be what I go on.  

Good question.


-- Modified on 11/28/2005 11:17:34 AM

-- Modified on 11/28/2005 11:18:34 AM

we want to see face and bod, and whatever you show us is what we expect.  Sometimes, less is more.

The absolute best is something obviously amateur, ie not too made up or posed, maybe a bikini shot on a beach, that shows not just appearance but also some attitude.  

Get a friend who knows their way around a 35mm, and go play frisbee on the beach in a bikini.  2 rolls of film, and you'll have what you need.  

...good one of her (smiling) face. Short of that, I'd want a plenty of communication up front to help ensure I'd at least like her as a person.

For me, personally, I'd prefer NOT to see naked poses. A tasteful-yet-sexy "boudoir" (lingerie) photo would do more to get me interested than any with nudity.

Heck, months after seeing it, I'm still haunted by one such photo of a lady from [censored]. It had it all: a beautiful smile, eyes looking right at you (the camera), the lingerie, the stockings, the heels... [sigh]

For me at least, I'll only see providers where I can get a decent idea of their body and I strongly prefer a face shot.  It's not a complete dealbreaker for me if there's no face shot, but you'd have to have some amazing damn reviews (or a world-class special) before I'll bite the bullet.  I prefer enough shots to make sure that I'm getting an accurate idea of the lady, but a dozen different galleries with a dozen shots each is probably overkill.

Enough to show her fully.  I want to know that when I show up, the only disappointment upon disrobing will be her seeing my body.  So, if her butt's a little large, lemme see it.  If there's a scar from the enhancement, don't obscure it with an arm.

Hey Sing, for me, the more the merrier.  Because I only know what I see, I want to see alot.  I don't really need expicit, I just want honest pictures.  I don't like to see all the tricks to make their stomach flat, tits bigger, ass smaller or anything like that.  I can understand some that hide their faces, but I like when they don't.  I have learned to really study pictures hard because I have been dissapointed in the end.

In the end, if there is just one real good pic, that outweighs many trick pictures.

do with their body, then how much of it you see, or how many times they show it. I have made decisions based on one good photo, and have been very pleased with the choice.  I would even see a provider if there were no photos if they did a good job of describing themselves to me. (And, of course, they had some good reviews on this site.)

Ideally, I like to see a front shot, a back shot, and a close-up to the face.  Bikini is fine, nudity is not necessary.  I am OK if they blur their face and identifying marks like tattoes, but then I rely more on the reviews to decide if I want to visit.

Pictures cant be all that necessary.... look at bebedoll's website.... you dont get hardly a glimpse of her at all.. and yet.. 22 pages of reviews..  for me, its more of the attitude they project.

When I started I had an unsuspecting civie male friend take some pictures with my digital camera and I cropped out my face before I put them on my website.  Since then I've a client takes pics and I've even taken some myself with the self timer.  Talk about a do-it-yourselfer.  

I've had partial face pictures at different times then I worry I might be recognized so I take them out.  Currently they are not on my site and new men email regardless so maybe I really don't need them afterall.  Although my face is my best feature so it's a shame I can't show it.

I've never had any nude pictures... I'd like to leave something to the imagination.

Just my 2 cents.

Megatha

Megatha dear, if you left us your web site we could see what we are missing (at least for now).  You can PM me.

an honest representation of the lady.  Real photos with the face blurred are fine.  Nudity is not necessary.  A nice swimsuit, dress, or lingerie giving a hint of what is underneath is fine with me.  Multiple angles or views to show the front, side and rear view help make the decision.  The pics grab Mr. Happy's attention, the reviews lead to the inquirying e-mail and then the date. Oh, the number necessary, four would be a minimum but I don't need multiple galleries (too much is overkill).  My pet gripe--no music!

Pictures do lie!  The thing that has happened to me on more than one occasion is the pictures look great--hair, makeup, lingere, etc. Then when she shows up she looks like she just got out of bed--dirty hair, no makeup sloppy clothes and hard to tell this was the beauty in the ad on eros or wherever!

as you are getting two posts. LOL.

I find it a hassle if the rates are not clearly stated on the site.

A picture alone won't *usually* do it.  However, there have been two exceptions.  One lady looked like a very souped up version of my first girl friend.  The second time the woman had a close up  of her pinching her nipple.  That just seared right through me.  However, I never really acted on that latter one.  I think I will someday, though.  Nothing about her has discouraged me since.

I've chosen to see women more on the basis of their writing than on their pictures-- but the pictures are important too.  I've got to feel some stirring when I see them.

For me, Ava Lynne's photos (she posts in CA Bay Area and NY and Wash DC) are excellent examples of tasteful teasing playful intellectual beauty.

I would say 6 shots from different angles. I suspect that all rear shots means what are they hiding in front? They do not need to be nude but at least a bikini shot or topless. I agree with other guys, rates are needed AND e-mail is good for those of us that don't have time or the opportunity to call just to get basic information.

Minimum 4 pics showing all...breasts, legs, side view, adn full body....smile is important but not entire face necessarily...but that is nice too.  Nudity not totally necessary but bkikin or lingerie enough to show true body compositition and style...the WORST is seeing picture of someone who you really desire and you show up and they are not what the pictures represented...it takes away for the session amd makes one feel cheated, etc...  ALWAYS BE HONEST IN THE PICS AND DESCRIPTIONS