there are those times when I need a little edge.. and will see a lady who has no reviews....  takes a bit to make that decision - and so far I am batting about 50/50 with respect to what I look for - if they are a reviewed person that percentage jumps to about 90%!!!  

help??.... I am here to help.

It adds to the allure. All ot that crap goes out the window as soon as I see some lace.

But understand even if the numbers were in metric, as long as they sound hot..... It would have me at hello

not measurable in numbers.  It's the chemistry before the appointment.  Unlike many hobbiests, I like to "know" the person I'm thinking of dating.  So many of my picks are the ones that come into chat, ones that post on the discussion boards, or ones I've corresponded with over a period of time by email and I get a sense of who they are.  Once they pass that test, the other statistics then come into play.  Call me strange, but without the chemistry, it's just another lay.

So, to answer the question, it's not hours, it's more like days, or weeks, sometimes months!!  But then, I've had a good success rate, so I have no complaints.

I just glance over the stats sheet for a few key items, and then go on to get a general impression from reading as many of the reviews as I can. The stats are often not accurate: for example, listing the provider as a D-cup, when she's clearly a B, or saying she offers CBJ when every review states BBBJ. So, I don't pay too much attention to the stats sheet.

--b.

I spend some time researching, but I am also looking at some other factors -- availabilty that matches up with my odd schedule, affordable rates, reviews, promptness in answering email, and so on.  I do have some preferences, and some things that are hard-and-fast lines that I won't cross, but that's just me, and I'm certainly not going to fault anyone for being interested in something or someone that I'm not.

I don't put a lot of stock in the basic stats, except as a very rough guideline -- I expect them to get ethnicity correct, and if a woman is 4 foot 11 inches tall, I expect that she won't be listed as "a statuesque 6-foot Amazon".  The guidelines are just that, and shouldn't be expected to be terribly precise.  I also don't pay too much attention to the differences in ratings, except to look for something that is way out of line -- what's the difference between "she was a 7" and "she was a 9" except personal taste, anyway?  I'd consider a 3, 4, or 5 to be a warning sign, though.