Just wondering. I don't understand reviews I've seen where the "Real Photo" option is set to No and the "Photo Accurate" is set to Yes. If it's not a real photo of the provider, how on earth can the photo be accurate? I can see it the other way around where it is a real photo of the provider but is not accurate (extremely photoshopped, very old pic, etc.).

The provider, now delisted for unrelated reasons, used someone else's photos but they looked a lot like her.  So, the photo wasn't real but was accurate.  For the most part I have to believe that it's either operator error on the part of the first reviewer, or someone filed a problem report changing one of the two and the staff member didn't think about the logic flaw they created.

I have seen in reviews, frequently for at least one oriental agency, the comment that the girl they saw is NOT the girl in the picture, but that she is a "fair representation", which I assume means equivalent build, face, and general hotness.