When I submitted a review last week, I carefully checked to see if anything has changed in the requirements for giving above a "7".  Yup.....Paragraph 7 reads the same:
BBBJ, kisses with tongue, really bi, anal.

However, for months now I have been seeing "8" and even "9" ratings for gals who do nothing more than massage HJ.  Apparently, in fact, there has been a change.

My vote:  get rid of the "anal" and "really bi" requirements.....
and the "merely has to be offered"......???  What was he thinking......that we would be walking in the door with a clipboard like a Census Taker?

My personal rating system:  If CIM is on a lady's menu, that makes her eligible for a 10.

The requirements for scoring above a 7 seem now to be "de jure", not "de facto".

It just seems the better way to go for me.  Plus I have my list of menu items I like. If I don't read those menuitems being offered, time after time in the juicy details, then I take a pass.  Of course, every once in awhile things don't go according to plan.

Something to the effect that FBSM providers shouldn't be held to the same scoring standards as full service providers. I guess they pulled that line from the guidelines somewhere along the way. Apparently the policy is still the same though because they raised the score I submitted on an FBSM provider, lol.

for massage & PV.  I'm not much into the massage happy ending scene , but have often remarked when done well a PV session can be exceptionally erotic & satisfying.  But no....a 9or 10 performance for a PV experience can not have the same criteria of a FS session.  I don't think the board has ever really addressed this reality.

Shut up! That is the biggest lie.