Not only from the stand point of protection, but one of boundaries. Questions arise.. Does she generally do that? Does she do that with only a "special" friend...how special is he if he is posting that?
I would assume she will have men who flock towards her feeling they have the "right" on the "menu" to insist on this. That already happens, but to have a review that pushes for that would be overwhleming at best. This is really a moment for safety emotionally and physcially that TER should take down the review. We have all assumed the the hobbiest is even being honest...how many of you post regularly that you feel the reviews are embellished etc!!!? Perhaps the reviewer is somehow attempting to hurt her...It really doesn't matter who the provider is... but..
There is someone on my radar.. I have seen her already.. She has a review and the review goes into detail about unprotected sex with her.. we all know it goes on.. I really don't want to know if a provider allows this..
My immediate response is to never see her again.. and move on.... so, as a general question.. I'm wondering if this information in a review helps or hurts a provider..I would expect BBFS to drive away business rather than encourage it. of course, each to their own.. but I find this sort of thing to be pretty destructive and negative.. each to their own I suppose.. but really?
There is someone on my radar.. I have seen her already.. She has a review and the review goes into detail about unprotected sex with her.. we all know it goes on.. I really don't want to know if a provider allows this..
My immediate response is to never see her again.. and move on.... so, as a general question.. I'm wondering if this information in a review helps or hurts a provider..I would expect BBFS to drive away business rather than encourage it. of course, each to their own.. but I find this sort of thing to be pretty destructive and negative.. each to their own I suppose.. but really?
But there are those guys out there who are looking for that. I know that every time I get a new review that doesn't mention a condom was used, I'll get a few dates who are disappointed when I pull one out.
Some will even mention that "your reviews don't say you use that!". I then have to explain that plenty of review writers neglect to mention that detail mostly because they think it goes without saying.
So yeah, the BBFS seekers will go flocking to that provider, but others will probably hold off for awhile or just pass.
xoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxooxoxxoxooxxoxoxoxoxoxoxo
NOONER: (noun) A sexual encounter during lunch hour, especially one that is illicit
There is someone on my radar.. I have seen her already.. She has a review and the review goes into detail about unprotected sex with her.. we all know it goes on.. I really don't want to know if a provider allows this..
My immediate response is to never see her again.. and move on.... so, as a general question.. I'm wondering if this information in a review helps or hurts a provider..I would expect BBFS to drive away business rather than encourage it. of course, each to their own.. but I find this sort of thing to be pretty destructive and negative.. each to their own I suppose.. but really?
That BBFS occurred ?
I understand that some idiots may seek this out.. I am at a loss to understand why a girl might provide this..
I see a regular who offered it to me as an upsell.. I have seen her at least 8 times.. She then proceeded to tell me that she did not use birth control "because of the health risks".. Hello?
I know way too many of the names on the AIDS quilt as people.. a face and experience behind the name.. Of course, now.. that specter has been reduced.. but to ignore the exposure is nuts. The easily resolved other STD's would also be a hassle to resolve below the radar..
I'm not nuts about condoms either.. no one really is.. but the alternative is so easily avoided.. and the knowledge that someone I am seeing is exposed is more than I can ignore..
So to the question posed in my subject line.. if BBFS happened.. and if it was specifically stated as a great thing in a review, would you be angry with the client or pleased at the great review.. ?
So to the question posed in my subject line.. if BBFS happened.. and if it was specifically stated as a great thing in a review, would you be angry with the client or pleased at the great review.. ?
Yes, we all know it goes on but it's usually something that doesn't get noised about by the provider herself....... so NO, she most likely would not be happy that someone wrote it in a review for all to see. ;smh:
xoxoxoxoxoxooxoxoxoxoxoxoxxooxxoxooxoxxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxo
NOONER: (noun) A sexual encounter during lunch hour, especially one that is illicit.
However, there will still be a few who thrive on danger.
Not only from the stand point of protection, but one of boundaries. Questions arise.. Does she generally do that? Does she do that with only a "special" friend...how special is he if he is posting that?
I would assume she will have men who flock towards her feeling they have the "right" on the "menu" to insist on this. That already happens, but to have a review that pushes for that would be overwhleming at best.
This is really a moment for safety emotionally and physcially that TER should take down the review. We have all assumed the the hobbiest is even being honest...how many of you post regularly that you feel the reviews are embellished etc!!!? Perhaps the reviewer is somehow attempting to hurt her...
If she's that reckless about protection, what other common sense items is she ignoring? Screening? Contact privacy? Low-profile hotel stays?
This hobby is dangerous enough without seeing someone who just doesn't seem to care.
I heard the high end girls that charge 1000 for an hour offer it.If someone were to offer bbfs at least be expensive about it right?Still not smart though.There was this girl in Chicago with 3 reviews.She charged bbfs for only 40.That's what her reviews said.People can be so petty
It would stop me from seeing her.
I sounded like Mr Gloom n Doom on another thread when I outlined two common permanent STDs not protected by condoms.
If I was that cautious IRL I wouldn't have volunteered for two combat deployments.
But senseless exposure in situations like this and considering that a couple of girls on my radar mentioned in their blogs they enjoy swingers clubs with clients, make you a complete idiot for pursuing BBFS.
It's no way in hell, I am taking any chances with my life seeing a BBFS provider!
There is someone on my radar.. I have seen her already.. She has a review and the review goes into detail about unprotected sex with her.. we all know it goes on.. I really don't want to know if a provider allows this..
My immediate response is to never see her again.. and move on.... so, as a general question.. I'm wondering if this information in a review helps or hurts a provider..I would expect BBFS to drive away business rather than encourage it. of course, each to their own.. but I find this sort of thing to be pretty destructive and negative.. each to their own I suppose.. but really?
Believe it or not, there's s certain sector of guys who love that shit, BBFS. They lurk the boards just for this kinda gal and thread. Yes it's reckless and some will even show up with their STD testing report ( yeah how fucking lame is that) but it's what turns them on. They may not chime in or comment but they're salivating as we speak. There's some "old timers" where this sort of thing is what they seek, it was normal back in the day.....But as the present community says now, "Hell no I won't go".
Maybe it is that I am just old or maybe I am surprised by those who think their "time" with a provider happens in a vacuum. Although I very much enjoy any provider who has oral fixations that turn her into a vacuum, but I digress.
I am working on the assumption that people on this site are over 18, I am also working on the assumption that all of the people "here" have had sexual relations with other humans.
Now those of us who seek service in most cases are having unprotected sex with someone in our lives and most who provide either are or have had unprotected sex with someone in their personal lives as well. (please read the word "most" before some of you jump my shit for generalizing).
So the question at hand is does advertised BBFS help or hurt. Those who run away from a provider who does BBFS for their reasons are counterbalanced by those who would run toward that same provider for their reasons.
The reality is that we engage in a risk/reward activity. Those of us mongers who swear off a BBFS provider have no idea that our SO has possibly found out about our little "outside activity" and are have BBFS with the pool boy or the guy next door or her co-worker. And those who rest under the false blanket that since their chosen provider always uses protection are just as silly. That provider has , in most cases, a SO as well who may be doing the very things our SO might be.
We are all human and all susceptible to infections and complications. Get tested, I advise to use protection and have fun. You can ruin anything by overanalyzing anything.
If it floats, flys , fucks or drills...rent it don't buy it...right?
Good point..
especially if she was very good at applying it so there was no break in the action. In most cases she put it on with her mouth & I had to check to see that she had berfore we went further... I will be more careful in my future reviews. (If you take it OFF, it had to be put on prior!)
Most guys claim that they would never go BBFS with a Provider. My guess is that most guys would like to go BBFS with a Provider. But are too scared to actually go for it. They can talk the talk. But can't walk the walk.
My ATF never had any BBFS session reviews. How did I go BBFSCIP with her? I just asked her and she said OK.
You don't want to go BBFS, then use a cover. Why would you dismiss a provider because she does BBFS? Just use a cover.
Perhaps you should learn more about condoms and STDs before you give advice here.
It's as simple as that. Please don't be angry with me for pointing out you are wrong. Again.