I just had a session with an escort that offered me bareback everything which I refused to do. Is it appropriate to put it in the Genaral Details of the TER review form as a warning to fellow hobbiests and to other escorts?

-- Modified on 5/11/2004 6:25:41 PM

TER has a no-bareback review policy.  

Why? Imagine this scenario:

I guy sees a provider for a while.  They connect at some deep level.  One day in the heat of passion Johnny goes swimming without his cap.  The guy writes a review to brag about his accomplishments.

Another guy reads the review.  He sees the provider expecting to get the same services.  She refuses.  He takes the services anyways.

Scary?  Impossible?  It has happened.

The benefit of releasing this information is far outweighed by the danger to the providers.

-- Staff

I am NOT (and I stress the word NOTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT) an advocate of bare back. But who am I to judge a provider on what she does/does not behind closed doors. There are some activities, which should always be kept between the contractor/contractee.  I am not sure if the original poster plans on seeing this provider again? If so, then it would be best to keep that type of activity between himself/her. If he had a good time or not is what should be concentrated on, and write about it in a dignified, gentlemanly manner . Now, I have read reviews where some of the men had hinted at this type of "bare-activities" in their reviews, and I know for me, as a woman-I would get very uncomfortable as even to a hint being remotely mentioned. Also take into account: you don't want to  intentionally ruin a provider's reputation, for she will do that on her own: by offering bare back to every single client, most will take a hint and stay away. Those who choose to stay and play, well it wouldn't surprise me one day, if their "favorite pal" falls off (sorry but have to be blunt). Be SAFE, and remember NO PLAYING WITHOUT THE CAP ON!

-- Modified on 5/11/2004 6:17:19 PM

What else do we do in TER reviews other than "judge a provider on what she does/does not behind closed doors"?  Why draw the line at cluing us in to dangerous behavior?

It doesn't have to be "every single client".  Even a 'priviledged' one or two is bad enough.

I agree there's the risk of a false report.  Never believe everything you read.  Providers often get bad reviews out of spitefullness.  But if I am convinced I'll be sure to stay far away.

I stated my views, re read it over, and still stick by them

Thanks

I'm just wondering about the multitude of reviews which mention BBBJ.  Why are those allowed, & a review with BBFS supposedly isn't?  I think all of the same issues & concerns mentioned are just as valid for BBBJ as they are for BBFS.  A little clarification, please, to ease my mind.

KCSHYGUY

I'd appreciate you letting me know via PM who it is - I like to avoid risky situations.