TER General Board

Nope ...
not2long 36 Reviews 3930 reads
posted
1 / 23

While responding to TiffaniXXX's post on the Rush thread below, I was remembering what my ATF had told me about some of her experiences.  The rush was one thing, but I found equally as amusing was the tales of the guys who didn't seem to care if she was there.  No names were given of course.

She told me about more than one client where she had to just really work to make the session happen.  Is wasn't that they didn't get aroused or that they really didn't click (she had those too), it seemed that the guys would just lay there and do absolutely nothing.  She'd laugh about it when she told me that she felt like saying to the guy "Come on, work with me here".  She said one guy just layed there on his back with his arms at his side....that was it.  No talk, no real response to her comments, just kind of like a dead guy with a hard on.  Not rude or mad or retarded, not much of anything.

Another fellow let her into the hotel and walked back to the bed where he was watching Star Trek.  When she joined him he just sat propped against the headboard and watched tv.  As she started to try to make something happen he got a little pissed and said he was trying to watch his show.  After an hour of tv she thanked him and left.  She said it was down right awkward to just sit there in silence with a total stranger in his hotel room with him paying $350 for that.  He didn't seem to care one way or the other. She was there at the time he booked and she gave him the full hour.  She just couldn't figure out why.

Just thought I'd share these.  I'd guess that most of the ladies who have been at this for awhile have similar oddities.



-- Modified on 7/20/2003 11:33:08 AM

singleton 5 Reviews 3556 reads
posted
2 / 23


loves to listen to the gal's tall tales of conquest. so the more varied their clientele the better

every provider that's been with me (hi sweeties! ;-) knows that i almost grill them on all the filthy gory details of their sickest queerest encounters. sometimes to tittilate ... but really mostly out of just plain curiosity

knowing that 95% of the guys out there are far more sicker than i am leaves me with a warm fuzzy feeling deep down in my core. it's self-affirmation that there just may be hope for me someday


my current favourite and the source of endless second-hand entertainment is Mr. Needle-Dick, who likes to have his dick pounded flat with a mallet and pierced with 6-inch-nails and heels and to then recite a French soliloquy while she watches (no assists)

and you gals complain about us wanting just basic Greek!?#?

LMAO







A Spectator 3978 reads
posted
3 / 23
Anya 4049 reads
posted
4 / 23

Of course, you realize that SPs in general can't respond to this because we can't talk about this kind of thing in public, let alone in private!

I have a strict policy of NOT talking about other clients (to other people) even if I'm pressed - I just think it's tacky. Even if there are a lot of great stories to be told, I'd have to figure out a way of doing it so that nobody was hurt.

-Anya

singleton 5 Reviews 2551 reads
posted
5 / 23


surely *anonymity* can't hurt anyone, can it?  what a provider chooses to reveal to me about her clientele is up to her. i don't press and i don't want any names. it's simply amusing and informative. plus, it gives me a sense of her "workload" and "training"


btw, in case it was misunderstood by anyone: "Mr. Needle-Dick' is a codename between me and a regular agency girl who *chooses* to see this character (easy money, and LOTS of it!)

any resemblance to anyone here on TER or elsewhere is purely accidental. as with nearly 98% of what i say here, this is all a work of "fiction" and posted for purely entertainment's sake  ;-)


book_guy 14 Reviews 3164 reads
posted
6 / 23

The typical, regular arrangement in an English verb, called the "weak" paradigm, is that a dental consonant (usually spelled "d" or "ed") indicates past tense. The three principal parts, in English -- infinitive/present, preterit, and past participle -- therefore usually go:

to X, Xed, (had) Xed

as in:

to pot, potted, (had) potted.

But some verbs are "irregular" or "strong." That is, the verb itself is more powerful than the paradigm, such that its own characteristics take over. Consequently, the dental consonant may not be used to indicate past, but something else entirely. For example:

to run, ran, (had) run

where a vowel change confuses the matter. Or:

to drink, drank, (had) drunk(en)

where both a vowel change and an optional suffix get all messed up in there. Then there's:

to think, thought, (had) thought

which really has no excuse.

As early as the Anglo-Saxon period, English often used paired verbs, one transitive (takes an object) and weak; one intransitive and strong. Hence the problematic:

to drink, drank, drank OR drunk(en)

One option has come to us Modern English from one earlier verb in the pair, one from the other. This dichotomy (intrans-strong versus trans-weak) is evident in the sit-versus-set and the lie-versus-lay conundra:

to lie, lay, had lain
to lay, laid, had laid

to sit, sat, had sat
to set, set, had set (here the dental is a "t")

The first verb listed takes no object (intransitive) and forms its past with a vowel change (strong). The second verb requires an object (transitive) but makes its past with a simple dental(weak). (The confusion comes from line one item two, "lay," which seems identical to line two item one, "to lay.")

You meant to say that he "did lie" or "had lain" there, and therefore "he just lay there." Or perhaps "he just laid himself there," but if he was capable of that, then he'd have no need for you, now would he?

Now perhaps we can all remember lie and lay, right? :)


-- Modified on 7/20/2003 4:36:44 PM

PacketInspector 2943 reads
posted
7 / 23

Thanks!

I love it that someone loves words as much as I love packets!!

LOL

the411aboutit 3348 reads
posted
8 / 23

I'm sure everyone appreciated the English composition synopsis. However, not everyone has attended college or has had the priviledge of taking English honors etc. So, I think you should just accept someone's post for what it is and not be so annoyingly anal about it.

not2long 36 Reviews 2686 reads
posted
9 / 23
orthodx 13 Reviews 4400 reads
posted
10 / 23

that I almost fell asleep but then remembered why I was paying the extra money and woke up.  It's hard to do nothing if you are on top particularly, doggie, ahhhh

singleton 5 Reviews 2705 reads
posted
11 / 23
Anya 3004 reads
posted
12 / 23

Sure, but if it's happening to "YOU" or anyone "ELSE" then it's purley accidental, right?

-Anya

Magnum 17 Reviews 2721 reads
posted
13 / 23

I can't help myself, this is just tooooo funny. We men have always talked about a woman 'just laying there' lol

I'm cracking up here, I've never heard of a guy 'just laying there'... of course I don't sleep with guys so how the hell would I know lmao

Now, true story, when a co-worker says f' you to me, my response is always, 'nah, you wouldn't like it, I just lay there. I leanred that at home.' lol I never thought it could be true that a guy would 'just lay there' lol

Thanks for making my night, probably my week

InterestingWoman 2609 reads
posted
14 / 23
book_guy 14 Reviews 3420 reads
posted
15 / 23

The Latin plural of a second declension neuter noun ending in "-um" is "-a." As in, "somnium, somnia," English dream, dreams. The plural which ends in "-ae" is of the singular first declension nouns that end in "-a," nearly all feminine. As in, "alumna, alumnae," for female graduate, female graduates. (The masculine would be "-us" "-i," the familiar "alumnus, alumni.")

You know, of course, I'm just joshin' ya in these posts ... :) ... but the grammar IS true.

book_guy 14 Reviews 3126 reads
posted
16 / 23
Slowstart 8 Reviews 3903 reads
posted
18 / 23

Book_Guy GET A LIFE this board is for fun and information nor put downs.

Slowstart 8 Reviews 2865 reads
posted
19 / 23
scampr 21 Reviews 2796 reads
posted
20 / 23

Until such time as providers and hobbyists switch roles then the customer is always right - right? just as providers can refuse to provide services at their discretion - and they may limit their services as they see fit. And then we decide who to visit. This is how our US version of capitalism works. But the underlying premise is that the customer is to be served. So if lying there is his gig - so be it. If swinging by his legs from the goal posts at Giant Stadium is his thing - then so be it.  How is it that we always get into these discussions as if these are dates. As if we have relaionships and thus corresponding duties and expectations?  Where is Bill Mahrer when we need him!!!?

-- Modified on 7/21/2003 5:45:59 PM

InterestingWoman 3725 reads
posted
21 / 23

It was a laugh fest. He's such a darling!

book_guy 14 Reviews 3927 reads
posted
22 / 23

You can't seriously believe I thought the grammatical correcting was legitimate or warranted, can you?

Geez ... if you can't laugh at yourself, who CAN you laugh at. It was A JOKE, PEOPLE, A JOKE, just a silly self-deprecatory thing in which I deliberately went overboard about MY OWN excess interest in grammar. Hence, *I* look worse than anyone, and am the brunt of my own joke.

IT WAS A JOKE!!!!

man o man

scampr 21 Reviews 3376 reads
posted
23 / 23
Register Now!