TER General Board

Never (EOM)
MichaelCA 12 Reviews 4334 reads
posted
1 / 29

I have noticed a few ads recently and even a couple of small sites that have no pictures of the lady at all. Most of theses sites do not even give a general description of the lady.

Would anyone even think about trying to set an appointment with a woman you have never seen? I am not talking about blurred faces in photos. We are talking complete "pig in a poke" time here. That might even be a very appropriate choice of phrase as well.

ZedEx 6268 reads
posted
2 / 29
riker 7 Reviews 3891 reads
posted
3 / 29

I'm looking at over 300 photo's of beautiful women, with beautiful bodies, offering me things that dreams are made of. That's just in my area. Why would I bother calling on a general description ad?

Hello, this is the Internet age, with a capitol "I." The days of black & white classifieds is over.

majemi 8 Reviews 3464 reads
posted
4 / 29

she had great reviews from well-known posters in which they claim she's very beautiful? There's someone that fits that description close to where I live, and I have to admit my interest is piqued.

TheLostSchlong 14 Reviews 3642 reads
posted
5 / 29

was recommended by a friend with similar tastes, then I would feel good about it. However, I've been burned by YMMV and I'm sad to say some of my recommendations have gone sour.

Some women are obsessive about no photos, but that is so blonde. Some great photography is out there with the face subtly concealed. Such photography is a fine art. This issue does not come up much anymore however in the Internet age. It is very easy to get photos and post them on Eros.

Maybe I'll start a free website where photographers can showcase pics specially designed for companion vixens. There's an idea. I'll give up bbjeoku's and do websites instead. LOL

-- Modified on 7/29/2002 5:30:14 PM

HazlEyes 6 Reviews 4199 reads
posted
6 / 29

I saw a site recently where the provider said flat out that she didn't need to provide pics because her reviews spoke for themselves.  Sorry, but that smacks of so much ego that I doubt she would be a good time (for me, at least.)  

I understand providers wanting to maintain their anonymity and be discrete, but potential clients need some sort of idea of the lady's build and look.  Discrete body shots with no or hidden face is fine... "I don't post pics because I don't have to" doesn't cut it.

blade runner 4067 reads
posted
7 / 29

I wouldn't waste my time as there is no excuse for NOT posting photos. The biggest problems are 'Recent' photos and 'Verified by' such-and-such photos.

qp4 5533 reads
posted
8 / 29

Although in principle I agree with those saying "no way", I'm about to set up with a no-pic lady anyway.  Crazy, eh?  But as one of your posters said, hard to ignore absolutely top-end reviews.  If this string's still around when I'm in town long enough to get this thing done, I'll report back.  There's a certain mystery here that beckons, beckons, beckons ...

GirlCrazy 5548 reads
posted
9 / 29
riker 7 Reviews 5197 reads
posted
10 / 29

I would have to have it on pretty good authority, but then again the intrigue of not knowing what she looks like might be fun, with those assurances in place.

177mm 4030 reads
posted
11 / 29

that's my ..... well lens length.

Sadly though, what about the fake or old photographs that are useless as tits on a nun?

bobsocks2 5877 reads
posted
12 / 29
bobsocks2 4368 reads
posted
13 / 29

is she not posting her photo?  She can 'blur' or hide her face.  But no photos at all?  

Pass!

bobsocks2 3952 reads
posted
14 / 29

Might want to check current info on another well known review site.  Maybe the reviews, which you are reading. are not.

Lets be careful out there....

riker 7 Reviews 4628 reads
posted
16 / 29
majemi 8 Reviews 4894 reads
posted
17 / 29

A lot of folks like to gamble. When the door opens and a knock-out is standing there, it's like hitting blackjack with a big bet on the table.

riker 7 Reviews 5203 reads
posted
18 / 29

You never know if it's going to be the girl in the pic, if she'll look better than her pictures, (and she often does) or if she'll look worse. Having some clue going in means less walking away with time wasted on my part.

Not to disparage your methods. Spin the wheel and enjoy the thrill.

straightman 4724 reads
posted
20 / 29

Two of the most erotic experiences of my life have come from blind ads. Eh, Blue Eyes?

More unusual than it used to be but sure! I would. The "Holy Grail" may be shy about showing herself. A physical description and tone of voice can be pretty interesting... Eh, Blue Eyes?

Lots of reasons to not publish pictures. No problem for me!

straightman 4826 reads
posted
21 / 29

I don't know about you, but I would recognize the posture, body language and shape of ANY of my ex-girlfriends. And many of their friends as well.

Would you recognize the body shape and posture of a co-worker? Especially a hot looker.... I did...

HootOwl 49 Reviews 4948 reads
posted
23 / 29

Whether she has good reviews or not doesn't indicate whether she would be a turn-on (from a looks perspective) to me.  

I also don't do my grocery shopping through the mail.

-Hoot

qp4 4499 reads
posted
24 / 29

Good suggestion.  What might these other review sites be?

FALCON 3839 reads
posted
25 / 29
John.Galt 3960 reads
posted
26 / 29


I would normally not even consider it. Though if she had a really good repuation or something I might consider it.

I am also much less likely to call someone if you cant see their face in pictures but I am more flexible on that one.

tennislover 10 Reviews 5744 reads
posted
27 / 29

Twice I've seen women who had no pictures on their site.  Both times I was pleasantly surprised to find an attractive lady.  They obviously were being discreet, and were willing to trade a few less clients for greater security.  One lady had good reviews.  The other was nice enough to talk on the phone prior to our appt.  
There's a risk of disppointment, but that can happen even if you have their picture.
I've continued to see both ladies.

a1btd39892 3892 reads
posted
28 / 29

i don't get it. why *wouldn't* you call, if the text on the web site interested you?

i've seen providers who bore little or no resemblance to their pix, and i've seen pix that were obviously the provider, but were deceptive (great cleavage in the pix, saggy tits in the encounter).

basic economics: investment times uncertainty equals risk. if you have to drive five miles to see her, schedule by email and she wants $400, you're taking a risk. if she sounds hot on the phone, gives a verbal description you find attractive, wants $200 and is half an hour away, why not?

low risk means: say goodbye and walk away if what you see isn't what you want.

Register Now!