Calling ROGM!  We've got a live one for ya, lol.  

This is a first for me in the year+ since I've been here.  A lady right here on one of the TER local boards is out right ADVERTISING a CreamPie date.  Apparently, only offered to gents with recent negative HIV/Herpes/Hepatitis status and at a nice premium to her average rate.

I'm not judging, but I guess I am a little shocked to see this straight up offered as a menu item by the lady, especially given the general consensus here on BBFS by both providers and hobbyists alike.

Is this just pushing the envelope?  

Is it outright going to far?

Your thoughts, if any..

When you need money really bad... imagine the risks people decide to take just to get it.Hell I'd rather sell drugs then do bbfs with some man I don't know.Just my opinion.

I hope she didn't forget that the original purpose of a condom was to prevent pregnancies.

END OF MESSAGE

Desperation is really a vicious thing... Lol she's new huh?  

The wonders of Photoshop and how easy it is to make fake health documents. If guys in Michigan are reaaaaaly trying haha

There was a lady in my city advertising here BB Greek Creampie...yikes she replied to a post looking for Greek she said she does creampies.Smh...whenever I read ads or posts mentioning it.Don't people know those health records can be altered

True.there is birth control.But it is not 100 percent.You forget to take that pill and you are screwed.Get pregnant offering bareback to clients...they won't know who the father is

I know lol.But which one is worse?selling drugs or selling yo kitty?lol

Some call BB Greek the "death shot". Guess why? SMH

Given that BBFS gets mentioned every now and then on this board, it makes me think that a lot of guys would like to go BBFS with a provider. But are too scared to actually do it.  

I have nothing against a covered session. In fact I've seen other providers that always use protection. There's a 26 year old part time provider I'm seeing this week. I'm so tempted to ask her to go BBFS. I'll see how things go.

I agree with Jaydalee, with computer technology these day, you can alter almost anything.

Ever since i started this hobby 2 years ago, i heard many doesn't like wearing condoms during sex because they claim they can't cum.  I have no issue so far with that.....

Now think of the probability that one guy (named him Bob) claim he is clean lets say he is telling the truth, his SO just cheated on him with some civvie how happen to be "un-clean", she got contracted and had sex with Bob, and Bob went to see that provider who offers BBFS, and of course she has not one but few client who take that offer BBFS from her...get my point.  Now you can all claim the chance to transmitting is low according to WebMD or whatever the source....1 out 100 or 1 out 1000.  But still all it takes is 1......

Well i'm done with my ranting, and i do apologize, but please BE SAFE.

Over at the over 60 board, there is a thread where researchers surveyed hobbyists. Unless people are lying, it seems like BBFS is more likely than one would have thought. And this didn't sound like backpage ladies, rather probably on TER.

1000% true. I find it disgusting. I don't care how good a person looks, stds don't have a look lol.

I'm going to preface this by saying, that in no way do I condone reckless unprotected sex acts, nor do i think it is smart for a client/provider to seek out and in engage in raw sex with random people.  I just like to sit back and take a critical look at things.  First I think that it is hypocritical to be hypocrites in a hobby where we know and understand that these things happen.  I have been seeing a lot of ads pop up lately of providers offering such a service, hell your favorite porn stars offer this service as well (with proper paperwork) even if it isn't always spelled out as such.  There are providers in New York and Dallas that are known nation wide as offering this service with 700 plus reviews.  

Also it is hypocritical that one of the providers commenting on this as a negative also posted a thread asking about how to get into the porn business, where they for the most part do NOT use condoms.  I mean sure there are company's that use them and some women with enough pull to make condoms a mandatory if they want her to work, but for a girl breaking in, that ass is getting raw dicked. Not to be cynical, but thats just how it goes.  For a bunch of us guys, isn't that what brought us to hobbying? Not the act of BBFS itself, but watching porn, getting horny, beating off, and then stumbling upon a service like BP, or TER etc which enables us to somewhat act out our carnal fantasies with a lady of our choice?  

So I ask, if one of the criteria of porn is regular testing, although there has been an outbreak here or there, the majority of the time thats all it takes is a clean test for the production to be a go.  Even in our civil lives, how long do we bang our SO without feeling like they are "clean" and can be trusted? I'm not advocating BBFS, I'm simply saying we can't be hypocritical of a person in a hobby where she is requiring the same proof or standards of an industry that we all watch and beat off too/masterbate for entertainment.  No one in here can be that naive to think that this doesn't happen just because it is "taboo" or shunned.  Read reviews, you'll find that it is alluded to far more than you think it's not.  

-- Modified on 4/11/2016 3:30:33 AM

I'm not positive, but it kind of looks like the subject lady "may" also offer BBGCIA.  Her website lists Greek as +$100 and "CUM in my BUTT" for +$200.  

A couple things tell me her CIA option is likely covered and just poorly written:  1) Nothing specifically states it's BB.  2) The rate for the BBFSCIP date is much more than a +$200 upcharge on her normal rate.  

That said, if I'm paying +$100 for Greek (covered) per her rates, I'm sure as shit not paying another +$100 or +$200 (or whatever she's charging in addition) just to pop in the bag, so for the extra $$, one could reasonably expect this to be BB.

Her website breaks down all sorts of options and charges.  I like the concept of certain options, but the execution in this case isn't working for me

but I do question the wisdom in blatantly advertising such a service, especially BBGCIA.

I am no prude, and I freely admit to having had uncovered sex with virtually every hooker GF I have ever had, not every one, but almost. The thing about advertising such a service is the "quality" of clients it's going to attract. It's one thing to do it from time to time with someone where rightly or wrongly it just "feels right" it's quite another to be a high volume provider doing it with "everyone" IMO it's not a matter of IF, but only a matter of WHEN she catches an incurable STD. I am sure a decent looking woman like her, with out over the top pricing and offering a service hard to obtain elsewhere could easily be seeing 3+ guys a day. Even though the odds are nowhere near as dangerous as people are led to believe they are where it comes to BBFS, bare backing a hundred different guys a month really is playing Russian Roulette with your life.

I camt believe i just read that! Who the hell would risk their health..for the green? Im sorry but i would tather be standing outside walmart asking for change than do that..Ive actually jad guys say they wanted to go bare just to get me pregnant..youd be shocked how many men ask that..im sure not all are serious..but thats still nasty,and a health risk to the community

Then what?

Provider z gets the STD and she continues BBFS with several (many) other guys and you can do the exponential math.

http://raemonroevip.tumblr.com/post/118455315387/so-you-wanna-go-bareback

END OF MESSAGE