Say you meet online a lady from a SB site. You stay in touch and then she appears on a provider site. You have been in contact via a SB site for awhile so do you need to let her know of your knowledge that she is a pro?

your SD profile, do you mention that you're a monger.  She's basically doing the same thing you are, so don't be a hypocrite. If you tell her that you *know* "she's a pro", what response do you think you're going to get back.  You don't have to see her.  When you know too much, it's often best to say nothing.   --z

That a SB (a woman who takes money for sex) is a provider (a woman who takes money for sex). I honestly don't see the difference, no matter how much the SB's want there to be.

I'm new so I'm not completely sure on this one, but I thought if u had a SB then she would be exclusive to you? No? Then what's the point? Is it less money to have a SB?  

I thinks guys who do the SB thing want the " illusion" that she is more exclusive.
If they only knew.  
 

The only person with whom you do not have sex

The only time you need to let an SB know that you know she is actually a hooker is when she tried to get all "virginal" with you and starts trying to string you along for "gifts" etc before putting out? At that point it's perfectly acceptable to simply call her by her hooker name and cut through the bullshit.

Exactly.  There are no Sugar Police.  No Escort Police. No Marriage Police.  No Betrothal Police.

and not sure I ever will.

I get both in the sugar bowl.  

I'd like to post more threads on the sugarbowl, but not sure where those threads should go now. I was posting on the Erotic Highway board, but the monstrous "Tell Us Your Story" thread has sucked all the oxygen out of the room.  They won't age that thread, it's really long, & it's really stale.   Sugarbowl posts seem out of place on the GD board--I think people come here looking for hobby advice.  --z

if you're getting laid as her SD at a cheaper rate than her provider donation, keep it to yourself.
If you're not getting laid as her SD but she's also providing, you have to wonder why she hasn't opened that menu to you. mentioning that you know she's a provider won't change that she doesn't want to fuck you.

He should start his own board and quit posting such stupid and incorrect information on this one.

I'm SURE back when I was on those sites, I've talked to some dudes here.  

There is no legal definition of sugar baby.    Court cases have differentiated between mistresses and prostitutes.  Being a mistress is the legal equivalent of being a girlfriend.  You can give your girlfriend cash, tons of it.  The court isn't going to delve into her head to determine if she's in it for love or money.  Same with a mistress.

Why you seem to attract "weirdos" like a magnet.  And love to rant about it.  You are one strange babe.

Some guys are looking for a non-exclusive arrangements. I was doing this on the old CL long before they called it "sugar dating."  

You wouldn't think the governor of NY would patronize an escort service, or the president get oval office blow jobs from barely teen interns.  Don't underestimate the stupidity of some men driven by their peckers.  

by how much money the SD has. If it doesn't pan out,  
ho hum, let's try again.  

I don't care what she does when she is not with me, and I don't want any woman 24/7. Except during that "new" phase, when the infatuation is at it's highest, once or twice a week with any woman is plenty. Sometimes in the beginning I will want to see a woman "all the time", but that wears off in a week or two at the longest.  

It's about as certain as that I actually wear khakis.  I hope you can do better.

If he doesn't bareback them, then he's doubly stupid for choosing a handle that implies that he does, therefore landing himself on a whole lot of DNS lists.

I doubt the person in question books with that handle.  Shhhhhhhh!