How many reviews is ideal for your comfort in seeing a provider? I have seen a few guys mention that they specifically look for ladies with fewer reviews. How many are too many? How many are not enough? Is how often a lady is reviewed an issue

that having quite a number of new reviews every month (good or bad) would truly indicate that she can't keep regulars. A few is great, but if I see a gal having 10 plus a month... I tend to think that they can't keep these guys around. Just IMHO.  

If I see a provider has, say, five or more recent reviews, that's probably enough for me.  Sometimes, seeing someone that new has advantages--like a favorable donation rate, to which you are often grandfathered, so you get the reward for TOFTT.  But recent is key--if there's two reviews from 2013, then one from 2012, then one from 2010, that's a real warning:  Maybe the girl is only providing when she's desperate for cash (which suggests she's not really "into" providing or may have some kind of substance abuse or similar problem).

Too many is a slight turn-off to me:  Emphasis on "many".  When the provider has 15 pages of reviews, going back ten or more years, I'm forced to realize that there is no way that this particular session will in any way involve me "..going where no man has gone before" (I know, none of them are virgins, but I don't want to ever feel like they fell they just have to "go through the motions", either).  I also know that the provider is going to be a fair bit older than her profile page indicates.  It looks like TER doesn't really "re-vet" profiles after the profile is established and the first review is submitted--and most providers lie by a couple of years on their age to begin with.

So, a "mid-30s" provider with a long record of reviews is very definitely now in the MILF category (nothing wrong with that, I've had great experiences with MILF providers, but let's be honest--they often get "stuck" in a perception of what their donation structure "should be"--and it's often not in sync with reality).

Aside from those very broad guidelines (and they are just guidelines, I make exceptions often, on a case-by-case basis):  Too few/too many reviews is not such a big deal for me.

I prefer the lady has been reviewed recently; Within the last 90 days but it is certainly not a deal breaker if she does not. Many leave the business for whatever reason. I do not care how many she has. To me, reviews helps tell me she is not LE.

Who has written them and what is being written in the reviews matter more..

I don't obsess that much over the number, only that she have at least three reviews in the last year that are good, and written by clients who have reviewed at least three other gals.

After that I look at the real issues that I consider important, mostly whether she and I would by sympatico, and she that she would do the types of things I like to do.

Beyond that, I see if her looks appeal to me, and of course, whether she fits my budget.

Strong recommendations from people I know and trust are also very important when I receive them.

there is none..you have nine..i am seeing a girl this week with 150..i would love to see you both..sex appeal is more important than numbers..

I've TOFTT a number of times, and I've also seen a provider with over 300 reviews when I saw her.

....to answer your other question... I like to see a minimum of 3 recent (within the last six months) reviews by reputable reviewers.  Or get a reccommendation from someone I trust.

For me the reviews are important for two things. 1)  establishing the legitimacy of the provider 2) to give insights into her personality and into what makes her a good match for my needs and desires. A few relatively current reviews, written by hobbyists who have also reviewed other established providers is sufficient.  

I saw one provider had over 400 reviews in 12 years. I find it hard to believe a lady wouldn't just be going through the motions at that point in time. AS far as too few reviews, not a problem if she has been reviewed by reputable reviewers. Might find a diamond in the rough before she ups her prices.

but I have been fucking for a lot longer than 12 years, and I have fucked a lot more than 400 women, and I hardly just "go through the motions"

There does seem to be a double standard where a man gets better with more experience and a woman just gets "used up", and I have to confess I am guilty of this type of thinking on occasion myself.

I agree with you about too few reviews, I don't need a "well reviewed" provider with five pages of glowing reviews, as long as I know her pics are real, that certain menu items are available such as DFK and BBBJ, and that she has a good attitude, that's all I need. One good review from a reputable reviewer is good enough for me.

are very interesting. If you divide that up, it is actually only 33 reviews a year, or only 2.8-ish reviews per month. To me that sounds like someone with a lot of experience!! Which would sound like a lot of fun. I guess you'd have to read the reviews- say the last ten and the first ten to see how she's faring. Is she still able to keep up the praise? Good times ahead!

many things give way to how much a girl works. location and cost of living, price, availability, what she will and will not do, how many boards she posts on etc. i highly doubt a girl at 1k gets as many calls as one at 200 all things equal. unless that 1k girl is in an area like NYC and the 200 girl is in the south. someone in most areas of the south charging over 400 is not getting that much business. same girl charging that in NYC might be seeing 3 a day.