I wouldn't want to be married or to have even a boyfriend while providing. Not because of moral issues necessarily but for practical reasons.

If anyone's getting ready to propose, wait till late this year when I disembark this merry-go-round.  

-- Modified on 2/27/2006 11:30:46 AM

I just called my wife and asked, and she said that she's not moving to Utah...so, I'm capped at one wife, at least for now.

...Bush gets to appoint another Supreme Court justice.

Yes. I don't have any issues with women making a living selling a service.

I think that sex and love are so often confused as one in the same. Sex is mechanics and love is acceptance.

It is only because of a religious sentiment that we equate love and sex as something sacred.

I love many, many people and it means nothing. I would have sex with many, many people (if I could) and it would mean the same.,. nothing.

So if she was proud, safe and the best she could be....? absolutely!

-- Modified on 2/27/2006 12:43:15 PM

Well I have an SO.  I have to laugh at this post.  Everyone has their own ideas I guess on this subject.  I know many ladies who have SO's.. boyfriends, husbands the like.  What I find interesting is that there are so many hobbyists who actually get turned off when they find out a lady has a boyfriend, husband etc.  I don't think it should make a difference because it is after all a business and no "real ties" should be made with a client in that regard.  Providers have lives too and families too, they are just like everybody else.  GRIN

.... we know the answer already-- we knew it before we ever even asked them-- the answer is, who knows? Different strokes for different folks. Depsite the fact that a woman is a provider, she is still a woman, and some or other (women) are not good as a significant other period-- no matter what thier job is. Some are hard to be with... some are great to be with...

Just the same, some guys can put up with the idea, and some cant; those that cant, dont, simple as that...

Dani



-- Modified on 2/27/2006 4:39:22 PM

...but VERY unlikely to happen.  I would want her to stop providing, but I would not hold her past against her.  Would depend totally on the quality of our relationship, just as it would with a civvie.

Does she mind if I sleep around on her while she remains steadfast and faithful?

Half the time you only have to scroll down to the bottom of the page to see the question has been previously asked.

Here's an idea to consider- just becauase an idea pops into your head doesn't necessarily mean you should post it.  Its just a suggestion, but why don't you check around a little bit first to see if the same question was asked yesterday- or this morning!

This is a non-specific rant and not necessarily meant to be directed at this poster.  But if the shoe fits...

Then why the hell did you ask me?? LOL. Miss you acidom!

You and others also have the option of passing on the thread as in DON'T read it.

before posting.  Seriously, sometimes these questions are asked twice on the same page, or on page two.  I think the boards work better when people don't fill them up with redundant posts because it does force the other threads to page two just that much faster- and we all know few people see them at that time.

In addition to the situation we're talking about, here's another technique that drives posts quickly off the front page.  Someone decides they don't want to respond (and post) under a thread that's now maybe half way down the page,  so they start a new thread on the same subject.

Of course, I have the option of not reading a post, as you suggest.  But they also have the option of not acting like a moron when a minute of two of searching would reveal that the question had just been asked.  

The boards actually do have some guidelines, some fomally posted and others informally posted by GND over the six years I've been here.   This one (about starting new threads just to see your name on top of the page when an existing thread is still on page one) has actually been discussed by GND in the past

I don't remember asking, but then again you do have a way of scrambling my brain.

I tried last week...we'll have to find a way.

I understand your point and yes the obvious and inane will continue flood the boards. I don't like anyone to feel pressure because they don't know or are not computer saavy. Yes, we also have to word harder at finding and reading threads that may get pushed to the 2nd page before they have been aired appropriately.