Dear TER Hobbyists,

I would like to take a moment to address a concern that has been recently posted on the “boards”, which has caused me much undo anxiety and grief.  A short time ago, some gentleman designated me as a “high volume provider”, which has a negative connotation attached to it, and I deserve the opportunity to not only deny the slanderous remarks, but also question the reviewers expectations and motives for making such a baffling statement.

I am a 22-year old law student who has been in this business for approximately one and a half years to help finance my education.  In that time frame I have learned so much about the nature of the business that I am currently employed.  I will openly admit that in the beginning I did have a misconception about the level and quality of service that I needed to provide to make my clients happy, which I initially perceived to be minimal.  In a very short period of time, I learned that I was very wrong.

I am in the business of customer service.  My sole purpose is to provide a pleasurable experience that is specific to each person’s individual needs and desires.  I feel confident that I do my job well.  I feel very flattered that my clients consistently like to return the favor by complimenting me in a public forum.  Therefore, it would not be inconceivable to view the multitude of positive reviews I have received, and extrapolate from that information that I have an extremely large clientele.  However, one should note that if I were not good at what I did, then no one would care to write about me.  A person in the “customer service business” who provides merely adequate service would not have any or minimal reviews, and therefore would be shrouded in a veil of anonymity.

As I stated previously, I am a student.  I attend classes five days a week.  It would be physically impossible for me to tend to such an abundant clientele on an everyday basis because I am not working that often.  In fact, I have never seen more than two clients on any given day.  I can account for my popularity from my extremely loyal and established clientele that has given me their business repeatedly over the past 18 months.

I question some reviewer’s motives for making such absurd statements.  I work in the service industry.  Obviously in order to be able to fund my education, I will be making new “relationships”.  Am I expected to be monogamous?  Perhaps some gentlemen should re-evaluate their expectations of all of the women who are employed in the same capacity?

Finally, I would just like to say thank you to all of those who have been so supportive of me.  I have made so many wonderful friendships, and have learned so much.  I honestly enjoy my line of work, and look forward to continuing.  I hope you will choose to be a part of it.  Thank you for your time and consideration, and I look forward to seeing you.

Sincerely,

Wendy

I didn't see the post but did you click on the username to see if he had any reviews or not?

-- Modified on 1/17/2003 3:13:27 PM

Wendy,

I have seen you on two occasions and your serivce has been top notch.You are an ultimate experience no matter what abbreviations one chooses to use (GFE/PSE).I look forward to my next endeavor with you.

Have a great day and continue doing what you do best....keeping us hobbyist happy.

No law firm is going to hire you if you don't know how to use an apostrophe.

Men unfortunately frequently fail to conceive that this business is much more about perception than it is about reality. While there is a tension between quantity of service and quality of service, if clients are happy with the latter, then the former really shouldn't be an issue.

Dear Wendy,

Comments relating to "high volume" were likely made because you have 21 pages of reviews. That represents more pages that most ladies have. No doubt, you have a loyal and satisfied client-base which chooses to be evangelical about your services. Perhaps you encourage your clients to post reviews more than other providers. Additionally, you may have a higher proportion of fake reviews by guys for membership purposes - through no fault of your own. Lastly, since you share space concurrently with other providers there is a perception that the whole situation is high traffic (I visited Mya when you were in the other location - she herself called it a brothel, albeit with all the girls as independents).

I must admit that I have thought of seeing you but I was a bit concerned about the "appearance" of high traffic and volume. While your services are reported to be about as all-inclusive as any guy would dream of, many of us become concerned for our safety when the risk is multiplied by the volume. It's just a perception that is hard to ignore.

How can you criticize the guy when you have no idea what his definition of "high volume" is? You say that you have seen two or less guys per day for 18 months. That is 14 or less guys per week - lets say for discussions sake 10 guys per week at about 80 weeks = 800 guys. If you use the 14 per week it amount to 1,120. Therefore, you have probably been with about 800 - 1,000 guys. I know you may not think that this is alot, but some guys might think that it is. Please, don't attack the hobbyists.

Bravo Wendy! I was bothered by those posting the "high volume provider" reviews. I have seen Wendy 4 times over the last 18 months. Each time was unique to our frame of mind at the time. Wendy is a "High Satisfaction Provider" of the first order. And I will see her again & again.

Sir, I was not attacking any one person in particular.  The letter you are refering to was about ME. Sorry for the misunderstanding. My posting was never meant to critize.

A risk is a risk whether it is with 1 partner or 1,000 partners.
Unprotected sex with 1 STD positive partner is not the same risk as protected sex with 1,000 STD negative partners. I feel safer having protected sex with Wendy than having unprotected sex with a woman you meet in a bar or a coworker or a casual acquaintance. If my wife or GF contracted HIV through a blood transfusion for example, I still would feel safe having sex with her as long as you practice safe sex. In the final analysis, it all boils down to the basics of the act itself, and not the statistical probability or improbability of the negative or positive connotations of a "high volume provider" is, whatever that definition is.....