Providers & Mongers, interesting indeed.
starting at the low end of high end, $600 a hour is probably (IMO) going to see more mongers than $2k hour.
The Provider menu is far from average across the board, Its like having dinner at a Michelin Star restaurant
or ordering pizza. They both make a turd and fill your gut, the only real time to order 5 star is for going out to events and having that arm candy to help boost my confidence when needed.
However, the lifestyle is like professional sports, you have the rookies, and the super stars and the has=beens.
Who has seen more?
The classic SW and Spa girls for sure has seen more, then the provider that travels the circuit or the FMTY ladies.
The hobby is strange for sure, one can not simply post reviews in some cases and it can be as simple as someone seeing it and firing of a private message asking questions or telling you about the encounter they had with said provider.
The hobby is strange indeed, Speaking for myself I have had far more providers join me for dinners and events, than i have had for,,, well you get it. The fun fact is that even tho the circle is small (6) they love it when the call comes and I ask if they are available for dinner or some kind of event, they dont charge anymore so is it the same?
Back to the OG question,, this game is far from just 30/60/90min visits, FMTY and so on...
I would guess over all the mongers see more, as the mental thoughts are so much different, mongers become (in some cases) addicted to the sex, where as for the most part Providing is all aboutthe Benjamins or 'the Stack'
and unless the hobbyist is financially set for life and pays attention, they can go broke in this game alone, where as the (in some cases) the provider wins financially because they save and listen to players in the game that might toss them some info to make money with the cash they have (wash it if you will )
Yeah,,, fuck it i dont know,,, im a rookie 
I would like to put together an anonymous survey to get some data on these kinds of questions.
My guess is that, per capita, providers have more sessions than clients. My logic is as follows.
1. By definition, the total provider sessions = total client sessions.
2. Studies seem to show there are far more clients than providers. The AI summary I requested found studies showing there are approx. 23 providers per 100,000 population; whereas the studies estimate 1 to 3.5 percent of men see a provider at least annually (equates to 500 - 1,750 clients per 100,000 total population). Do the math, and it suggests there are between 21 - 76 clients per providers in total.
3. So, to finish the math, let’s assume an even 20,000,000 sessions happen each year in the U.S. (population 343 M). That means there are approx. 78,890 providers in the U.S, having an *average* of 254 sessions per year. Whereas there are between 1.7 - 6.0 M clients having an average ranging from 3 - 12 sessions per year.
*caveat: you can argue with these numbers, and; like I said, I would love to see more, actual data. But I think this is the right approach. And it seems to make sense that there are WAY more clients than providers. Think about the busiest 10% of providers, vs. the busiest 10% of clients. I would guess it’s extremely rare for a client to have more than one session per day; (one paid session per week seems to be about the busiest that most clients get). But it seems plausible that the busiest providers may see 5 to 8 clients per day.
** Of course, most clients see multiple providers as well. I don’t think this changes the ratios significantly, because it increases the total number of sessions on both sides.
