I've always wondered who uses their own real life ratings rather than going by "TER ratings" for looks. If you see 100 girls it should be something like this.

And / Or pay higher donation requests!

Yeah, I'm kind of UTR!

Is that too many of those that review are not able to nor likely have ever been around really hot women.

If they were walking by on the street, I'd probably snap my neck.  

but unfortunately, if we are going to go by the average woman here, TER scores are at least two full grades higher and in many cases three or four grades higher than my own personal rating system. Actually I may be even be a bit generous in my assessment.

Heidi Klum when she was around 25 was a perfect 10. It's unrealistic to expect hookers to be 9-10 types. If they were that hot they would not be here!

I suspect you find the 9's in hooker land outside the United States.

Over the years I've met many many prostitutes for play.  Most of them have been OK looking, but certainly not DDG.  I know many of them get 10s routinely on TER.  They are very nice women too, but if I am going to just rate on appearance, then as you said, most are in the 6-7 range.  And that's above average compared to the total population.

Betty White types

Those types of scores make a mockery out of the entire rating system and makes the numerical scores all but worthless. I only use the numerical scores to exclude women I know will NOT be attractive, not the other way around.  

It was just more marketing bull$hit.

There is no such thing as a 10 but when she was young I thought she was close.

but yeah, you got me. The only ones I've fucked or even seen in person were in other countries. I am sure they exist right here at home, but I have never met a hooker in the USA that made a solid nine on the GaGa scale. Maybe if I see enough different women before I die, I might just find one of those fabled unicorns right here at home, but time is running out I suppose. lol

but although I can't speak for BBFS or OTM, I have never, nor do I ever expect to pay for sex with a fifty year old until possibly I reach the age of 80, nor is a woman like you likely to ever get near my balls, much less have the opportunity to put those massive globes into your little ho bag.

However it's highly subjective.  I have no doubt that some guys here can see a +50 prostitute as a 10.  Same as some see a young 23 y/o as a 10.  I can't criticize someones personal likes or tastes.  Any more than someone can criticize mine.

If you define a 10 as someone who is at the 98th percentile or above of 20 something girls, I've seen one of those.
If a 9 is 95th-98th percentile, probably 20% of my experiences would count as a 9 ( maybe 3 providers total).
This is paying 400-700 per hour in the bay area

In any world or any standard of 1-10 isn't 10 supposed to denote PERFECTION?  

If you are ever feeling REALLY generous, perhaps you could promise me NEVER, never in a million years. "please"

I saw your posts from the other day and you vehemently denied taking steroids.  But from your explosion here, I think you might have taken a double dose today.

Posted By: JuliasLittleSecret

if all of the hookers are beneath your standard.  
   
 ALL OF YOUR FUCKING BALLS ARE IN MY PURSE, you full of shit pussies.    
   
 L. M. A. O.  Paying $$$ - $$$$ - $$$$$ for pussy that doesn't measure up for you...BULLSHIT!  
   
     
   
 

-- Modified on 3/7/2016 9:31:48 PM

Have you ever see a 10?  Does one exist?  If not, why have a 10-point rating system?

recent reviewer (or more) and ask if her pics are accurate.

Since the 10 point system is at most a five point system in practice, with 1-5 being essentially meaningless as a TER six translates into "butt fucking ugly" I say expand it to a 1-100 rating system,. which would mean a usable scale of 70-100 with everything below a 70 being "too ugly to fuck"

The single best looking woman I have ever been with is a provider and would rate a 10 on any scale.  She is one of the best looking women I have ever seen. She could have been a model.  I have also been with a few providers who would rate a 9.  And I am not inexperienced, either in the civvie world or the pfp world. So your blanket statement that there are NO 9 or 10 types in hooker land is just wrong IMO.

For those of you who don't see 10s EVER, you're just supremely picky, but part of the problem is the TER system calling a 10 one in a lifetime. That's what's broken. In the real world, men I know don't think a 10 means beauty that's one in a million or billion or some such nonsense, but certainly it means she is in the top percent or two of beauty.  1% of all women is still a lot of women.  

I also enjoy viewing the female curves in a variety of packages from different ages to different ethnicities.  

With age, things change, so for example, "acceptable" levels for certain tests of sugar (HbA1C if you must know) change. Your post suggests a new area for research: Female attractiveness ratings normalized for rater's age. The older I get the more women become attractive to  me. (Each woman seems more attractive than she would have been when I was 25 years younger and more women seem attractive.) I saw a lady the other day (not reviewed by me) who was not well rated for looks, but I found her attractive to me (particularly after some excellent DATY.)

Your post is a perfect reflection of what the OP stated. You say that maybe 20% of your provider experiences are really a 9 "maybe 3 total".  Yet your review history shows 73% have rated a 10. Hmmmm.

That was fucking funny, Julia!

No one wants to fuck an angry, ball-cutting ho.

I seem to be a much harder grader as I get older and much less likely to fuck a "so so" woman, much less an ugly one.

Excepting a few early reviews I made, whenever I give a 10 it's for a woman that is above the 93rd percentile of early twenties women- one out of 15 or so. Been to a college recently? That's well within the range of "fucking hot" as far as I'm concerned. So yes, one girl was in the top 2%, another 3 or 4 in the next 3%, and then another 4 or 5 in the next 2%.

So now you're saying I'm right? I can't believe that. Oh wait. You're yanking my chain. DUH.

As I get older I too am less likely to settle for crap food, boring hotels, or poor seats to call games, but women who I would not have found attractive are actually more attractive to me. Older ears hear the same sounds as younger ones, but those sound are richer in lower frequency sounds than the same sound to younger ears more able to here high-pitched sounds.  My eyes see women and they are actually more attractive than they would have been.