in general i find that guys that have dozens of reviews tend to be those that visit countless inexpensive quick asian girls. ...which just goes to say like chinese food ... visiting one of those girls and an hour later you are horny again ! LOL
And what does TER think about it?
This is as spinoff of another thread, so I wanted to talk about this specific topic as so far I haven't gotten a real response as to why.
In all other industries anyone on review sites, subject matter experts are cherished. Food critics with hundreds and thousands of restaurant reviews, imdb movie watchers, doctor goers, lawyer evaluators, college professor evaluator etc
All are encouraged by people in the community. Reviews are a backbone of the community of reviews.
This site is entirely based on reviews. It's called a review site and everything about this site is literally about reviews. People go on this site to read other people's reviews to put a value on goods and services sold by the seller.
This is the ONLY industry where the sellers are treating many reviews as a bad thing. These are the same sellers who are also part of this community - or pretend to be hoping their advertising gets through - hypocritically putting down people who have gone out of their way to help others. And they're somehow villains.
Ironically, some of the same sellers go apeshit when some fo their reviews aren't pristine.
So what does TER think about all this? Users are incentivized to write more reviews but now some sellers who are on the site as well want to shame users into writing less reviews?
Help it make sense.
Sincerely,
A concerned review writer and a member of the site who thinks prolific reviewers should be cherished, not shat on.
-- Modified on 11/23/2025 6:40:48 PM
Yes, there are some people, mostly some providers, who do not like reviews. But I fail to see evidence that writing reviews is frowned on here, discouraged or that reviewers are "shat on." Yes, it's a review site. TER rewards all reviewers with free time. Many reviewers are admitted to the "private" reviewers only board -- showing that they are valued.
So exactly what are you complaining about?
Well, I'm talking about this post in the neighboring thread.
I think being a prolific reviewer would be more likely to be viewed with concern, if anything.
It can be easy to get into a bit of a bubble here. But for a decent number of providers, “100 reviews written” doesn’t mean “active and upstanding member of a community.” It means, “I banged 100 providers and told the internet what their pussies felt like.”
Personally I am happy to see hobbyists - I am just saying that many other providers find review culture in general distasteful, or object specifically to the explicitness. Surely that was already understood?
I like having the experience I provide shared. Having my actual genitals described does feel crass.
I promote writing good fantasy reviews. I believe they bring business. People read reviews. Even those who choose not to participate in the review culture.
Just remember these are fantasy reviews. Fantasy. I have always enjoyed erotic literature. I get aroused reading some of these TER reviews.
Opinions are like assholes. Everyone has got one.
Don't let other people's opinions get to you. TER is the judge of what is valued here and what is not. So far as I can tell, reviewers are still valued.
Some people just have different preferences. You seem to be really worked up off the words of one specific provider that you probably weren't going to see in the first place.
But to actually answer the question at hand, some providers are in fact low volume - and someone having a ton of reviews indicates that they probably don't do much repeat business, which might be warning for a provider that prefers repeat business over a bunch of one time clients.
Or it could be that some providers don't want to be reviewed at all, so someone with a ton of reviews seems like they won't honor their no-review policy.
Or it could be any number of other reasons. At the end of the day, it doesn't matter. Each individual is entitled to their individual opinions. Find someone that jives with you.
I'm asking why someone doing exactly what the site is meant to do, is met with such contempt.
If banging hundreds of providers and telling about it on the internet is so wrong and makes one so uncomfortable why be a part of the review community on a review board?
Id expect people who are comfortable in selling sexual services be fine with prolific reviews of sexual services. After all, people are paying money for it and want to tell others of relative value and contrast and compare with others.
Do restaurants care much if you've visited hundreds of restaurants and have hundreds of reviews on yelp? I know people who see a girl or two damn near every day. Why should they be penalized or looked down upon? I myself have hundreds of "bodies" on me. Why is it a bad thing per se?
And it's not a singular occurrence. How many times have we heard about slobbyists and review culture?
She’s obviously moved on. Who cares what she thinks. This is a review site. Most who participate here have no contempt for someone who writes a lot of reviews. You’re asking everyone to answer for what one person thinks. And before your wheels start spinning, I imagine she’s not alone. But most who think like that wouldn’t spend time here. Take a deep breath and move on.
Most normal reasonable people are able to use deductive reasoning and get this. Mr. Q however thought it was acceptable to call me "diabolical" because I said that providers have the right to not see a client for any time for any reason, and that includes reviews. Good grief. And we again wonder why so many providers have no desire to post on this board or even have reviews on this site.
Exbibit A.
He’s stuck on one very specific comment he finds offensive. He can’t seem to move off it. Any response to any other part of the conversation gets glazed over and he keeps coming back to that same comment. He wants us all to answer for the blasphemy he is feeling. There is no reasoning here.
My statements were
"Wanting all the benefits of selling a service and none of the downside is diabolical"
And
"You co-signing shitting on a community that is all about reviews, built on reviews, and literally exists only because of reviews, is diabolical"
This is not meant as an insult but… Have you ever been tested for Autism? Maybe you should, it could explain a lot. Your hyper-fixation on topics/details, your inability to let things go, your rigid definitions of right and wrong all kind of suggest you’re neurodivergent. You might want to get that checked out. It’s not just you either. I have a feeling a few guys on this board are on the spectrum.
-- Modified on 11/24/2025 12:32:05 PM
Not that I know of. And if even if I was, does it change anything? But no, AFAIK I'm just very passionate about consumer protection and consumer rights and review communities treated right.
Unlike you, i view this community as reviews first.
A diagnosis is unlikely to change your views of reviews or escorts. A diagnosis, possibly combined with therapy, can provide some self-awareness and a better understanding of other people. This could potentially improve your communication and interpersonal relationships. For example, you might learn that sometimes you need to give it a rest. Because people aren’t going to listen to you if they don’t like you, even when you’re right.
How very non-autistic of you.
But pretty spot on…
You’re not the first person to note this. Multiple posters in multiple forums here. I think you’re onto something.
Perseveration or repeating something persistently and redundantly is symptom of brain damage and autism.
Providers advertising themselves persistently = not autism
Same agency account posting AI generated redundant questions every day =not autism
People in p&r rehashing same political topics year in and year out = not autism
Rocket talking about reviews (which BTW are the most important part of the site we're on and the only part I care about) = autism.
How cute, consistent and fair.
Why is being on the spectrum bad! I love my spectrum clients.
Yet I never "co-signed shitting on the community". That never happened. Ever.
All of the years on this board I have given LOTS of examples of how to make this community better, and the most recent suggestion circled right back to you.
Saying that providers and clients have personal autonomy and all transactions should be voluntary, as well as participation on this review site or any other review sites is the complete opposite of diabolical.
I really don't give a shit if you attack me, I can handle it. But the problem is other providers are going to read the garbage you wrote to me and think WHY would I want to deal with that complete nonsense? Why would I want to participate where guys think it is OK to talk so poorly to another provider that does not agree with them?
The only one right now shitting on this community and preventing other providers from engaging and even wanting reviews posted of them are guys like you. If you think anything in sex work should be anything other than voluntary YOU are the one that is diabolical. If you plan to post anything besides an apology to the community for this mess you created, don't bother.
I merely asked why it's OK to shit on reviewers in a community that is ALL about reviews, is built on reviews, and generally encourages reviews.
You on other hand made it seem like I say providers must see guys involuntarily. No, I never said this.
Apologize for what mess?
That I think prolific reviewers should be given respect and not open contempt?
That this site is all about review of sex workers, and that includes how they perform sexually and that there's nothing wrong with banging 100s of sex workers and comparing them?
And there's absolutely nothing wrong with that and that anyone suggests that is anti review community?
Maybe you want me to apologize for using diabolical? Look it up how Gen z uses it, it's really nothing too extreme. Ask Google what diabolical means in slang.
I never insulted anyone, I never lied to anyone. All I want is reviewers on this site - that is once again dedicated to reviews, not any other bullshit - to not be attacked and swayed to write less reviews.
-- Modified on 11/24/2025 1:08:21 PM
I don't think it's just one person. There are other people who think this and there are even more who think this but don't say it. This goes with the whole "review culture" thing and there's damn many people who don't like the "review culture" .
I want to get to the bottom of this. I've yet to understand this, what makes sampling and comparing how each pussy feels and telling the internet bad? Isn't it what consumer review are all about? Still wasn't able to get the answer.
So then do we all agree there's ABSOLUTELY nothing wrong with this and that's what this site is made for and that's why most of the male audience of this site is on here for? That prolific reviewers should be cherished not shunned?
And that banging providers and evaluating their pros and cons, including looks, tightness and other sexually related things absolutely normal and they shouldn't *ever* be penalized because of this?
That these people *are* upstanding members of community that is all about evaluating providers?
And conversely, that anyone who suggests this is anti-community (which again is all about writing reviews)?
Do we agree?
And anti-TER?
Seems so to me. If the main purpose of this site is to consume and produce reviews, people who think 100+ reviews of providers and how they pussy feels is bad and it doesn't make them upstanding members, then they are anti-TER, no?
I believe this checks out.
Bad, no. It’s a personal choice. I don’t agree with the choice, but also don’t think it’s bad. Maybe, coming here and posting this idea on the boards was a bad idea. This isn’t the place to share that view. But I won’t use the word “bad” for someone having that view.
There are people who never come to these boards, for example, that think all of us are bad. They think escorting is bad, both providers and clients. While I don’t agree with them, I don’t label their views as bad. They have their reasons. I have mine for disagreeing. But if they were to come here and share such views, I would consider that bad.
The idea is, don’t come to my home and shit on my doorstep and I won’t do the same to you. It’s okay to live in a world with different views. But I do believe in sharing such views in the right spaces.
-- Modified on 11/25/2025 11:26:31 AM
We’ve gotten to the bottom of this multiple times. The reasons for providers disliking reviews and reviewers have been discussed ad nauseam. You just don’t like or agree with the reasons given. Personally I think some reasons given make more sense than others. Some excuses given are fair, some are unfair. It is what it is. If you haven’t figured out why some providers don’t like reviews and reviewers then you never will (or you don’t wan’t to). Either way it doesn’t matter. There are going to be providers that you don’t want to see for whatever reason, including their review policies. Also, there will be providers that don’t want to see you, for whatever reason. These are individual decisions. If a provider doesn’t want to see you, then they won’t see you. That’s really all there is to it. You just have to accept the fact that some providers don’t want your money. You can bitch and complain all you want about it, but it probably won’t change anything. Your incessant posting likely does the opposite.
.
To be direct, you’re very argumentative, annoying and unpleasant when you discuss this topic. That turns people off, regardless of whether they agree or disagree with your argument. Any provider that see’s your posts is going to think that any policy that keeps you away might be a good idea. Any client that see’s your posts is not going to want to be lumped in with you. Nobody is going to agree with you even if they want to.
Once again, no one argued that if a provider doesn't see me they should. No one.
But putting down people for being prolific with reviews while hypocritically enjoying the benefits of them is nasty and vile.
People write reviews to share with others and they are put down for doing what the site is made for.... That is anti - review site and hence anti community to me
That doesn't mean a provider has to see a prolific reviewer. How about merely not shitting on them publicly and giving an impression that it's better to have less reviews than more reviews? If someone thinks someone with 100+ reviews is a bad thing why are they posting on this site at all?
As far as not agreeing with me even if they want to - well I guess that shows the priorities. I guess people would rather look good than agree with something they believe me just because it's me saying this. But hey what else is new, people prefer perception to truth. Not me.
First of all, I agree with you. I’m very uncomfortable with how many providers talk negatively about their clients these days. I don’t like how providers, on this board, have recently talked about reviewers and “review culture.” It can be very insulting, especially considering the high rates we have to pay.
.
However, have you ever heard the phrase “you’re wrong, even though you’re right?” It gets used to refer to a situation where someone is correct, but their general behavior makes them unlikeable and unsympathetic. That’s kind of the point I’m making. If you learned to be a bit more concise, and a bit less argumentative, you’d have a better time getting your point across. Instead, you’re always trying to prolong conversations and get the last word in and this hinders your ability to communicate effectively.
This is not the only industry where prolific reviewers are sometimes viewed negatively by purveyors. The restaurant industry is a prime example of this. No restaurant really likes reviews unless they are good. Chefs sometimes feel more negative toward "known" food critics. It can be a bit of a love/hate relationship. The reasons are obvious.
- It might be assumed that prolific reviewer client will approach the encounter with an overly critical eye, instead of just enjoying the experience. Its the difference between being inspired by a great experience to write a review, and approaching the encounter with writing a review already in mind.
- The client's opinion might be viewed as having some prominence, and therefore a degree of perceived influence over the purveyor's business, which adds considerable pressure.
- Prolific reviewers rarely become regular clients. Most providers prefer having regulars.
- Some don't like to feel like they are under a microscope while trying to share pleasure with another human.
Its not all negative. Prolific reviewers have their positive points too!
- They understand how this game works, so less likely to be a problem client.
- Providers can read the client's reviews to see how to really knock their socks off.
- If the client has a great time, there's a good chance you will get a great new review, which can attract more business.
- If a prolific reviewer writes a good review, it can be seen as more meaningful than a review written by a love struck client who has limited experience with the ladies.
Most ladies who participate here on TER either like having reviews, or they at least feel its beneficial to their business.
Why, as a consumer, would I choose to go to a restaurant that is NOT good?
Isn't that the *point* of reviews in the first place?
So then it's not the prolific reviews you're talking about, you dot want any reviews period and serve shitty food. How is that good for consumers, ie this community of reviewers? I'd argue that is no good. If your food or pussy is no good, why should people go to you? (not saying you in particular). And reviews were created precisely to distinguish between good and not good, no?
"overly critical" - well that's exactly what I thought! A reviewer with a large enough sample size who is an expert in subject matter and compare and contrast, statistically the provider he's reviewing (not addressing anyone in particular) aren't likely to make their top 10% or whatever.
So this contempt for prolific reviews seems to stem from own insecurities that someone will be critical of them because they're not as good as others sampled by reviewers; as reviewers have enough expertise to identify where on the bell curve of all experiences this experience lies.
You.. inferred a lot of things from my post that I did not say.
I suggest you read it over again, focusing on what I actually did say.
You asked why some might view a client who has written 100+ reviews as undesirable. I told you some reasons why some providers might hold that view. I also listed some positive points for prolific reviewer clients.
Sometimes you just need to accept things as they are. Accept that some providers feel negatively toward prolific reviewers. Accept that some providers feel positively toward prolific reviewers. None of that will change, no matter how many posts you make.
Its apparent that continuing to go round and round with you on this topic will be exhausting, so I won't.
...and I know a thing or two about how hospitality operators feel about reviews.
Describing some of the reviewers as overly critical touches on a great point in this conversation. Some reviewers (food & pussy) have gotten the notion in their head that they're a critical part of the equation and are more focused on building THEIR brand as a reviewer than trying to describe the experience they have had. It's a double edged sword at best for operators in the hospitality industry because so many people act simply on the desire for self importance and clicks. Prolific reviewers will hardly take the time to document a meal that was satisfactory and provided the value for what was purchased. How fucking boring is that?
MANY love to hear themselves speak and MANY others see themselves as God's gift to the service provider or restaurant. If it didn't affect reputations and the ability to make a living for so many, it would be comical seeing some of these reviewers twisting themselves into knots trying to create the worlds greatest or most compelling novella.
Too many reviewers take themselves way to serious and the desire to be heard is so great that they are more than willing to focus on the negative and ignore the positive...embellishment is their super power. There are those on the other end of the spectrum that will gladly curate their review in exchange for something of value or use it as a tool for trying to get a better deal.
This won't sit well but there's way too many socially awkward dudes in here that would never get close to getting a woman naked if this industry didn't exist. Beyond the factual parts of the review, how accurate is there description of what the provider was like? If it takes 55 words to describe how you made her cum, you're writing to listen to yourself. If you're searching for those kind of reviews, you're likely hear to get aroused so you can jerk off. Both parties feed off each other.
in general i find that guys that have dozens of reviews tend to be those that visit countless inexpensive quick asian girls. ...which just goes to say like chinese food ... visiting one of those girls and an hour later you are horny again ! LOL
This is by far the best review site out there.
Just keep it real in your review for the buyer. But as ive learned, dont keep it too real if you are getting really good service, as not everyone may be getting the same perks.
Just keep it honest so others know what to expect.
Listen, I would agree if it wasn't put as banging 100 providers and comparing what their pussies feel like and telling the internet.
The phrasing basically implies that we as reviewers should be almost somehow ashamed to do this and it really bothers me as to why.
Like is it the 100 bodies, is it evaluating pussies or is it telling the internet that is bad? If we stay monogamous but evaluate pussy and tell internet is it better? Or whatever combination.
Sorry, that did trigger me. I feel like anyone thinking that of a reviewer might have some contempt for the whole review thing, and this is why many of us are here in the first place.
Anyway I'm gonna try to take 420s advice. Happy Thanksgiving.
Again - to be clear - that is not how I think of it - but I wanted the original commenter to be aware that some escorts do see it that way.
Hope you had a happy Thanksgiving!
I am approaching 170 reviews for my second alias on this site in 15 years! I try to be helpful in my reviews and add a little humor and levity to the boards. I think everyone who follows this approach is probably valued by the site and the community! If you are getting dramatically sideways with one group or the other, it is probably your fault for being combative. We all know folks in real life who have this problem. I have a former business partner who never realized that 100% of the people she dealt with thought she was a dick! I finally couldn’t take it anymore and called it quits- there’s something to be thankful for tomorrow!
Look at providers who have over a hundred reviews is that a bad thing?
I personally find it very difficult to get reviews, and I do not see many people. I average about 1 new person each month. My body count is extremely low. I don't judge those who have higher.
Some of my good TER friends have hundreds & I love them.😍
Must be a "fan" of mine who couldn't help himself to call me autistic one more time, by bumping a five month old thread.
This thread was made after someone claimed having 100+ reviews is not someone who should be cherished by the community. But it was half a year ago. All the folks who love to tell me to move on should consider taking their own suggestion here.
-- Modified on 5/12/2026 2:11:56 PM