TER General Board
If you generally wear, . . .
a loin-cloth, you are still a hunter-gatherer. Lol
Years ago, when Danny Bonaduce had a radio show, he said he would rather fuck a 7 he hadn't been with than a 10 he had been with. I see two ladies on occasion and think they are beautiful and awesome in their service. Each time I leave I feel like I will never see another. Yet, here I spend my time looking for the next one. Sometimes I get a hit but often, I am disappointed. I know it is in our DNA but my DNA doesn't warrant my two beauties.
The first type are the hunters. For them, half the thrill is in the hunt for the next experience. They see little reason to repeat because nothing will be new. Often, before they have even driven away from the last session, they are already thinking about who might be next.
The second type are the nesters. These are more comfortable with the familiarity of having a regular lady who they see repeatedly. They are sometimes uncomfortable with the natural awkwardness of the first meeting, and all of that goes away when they repeat.
Finally, there are those that are a bit of both hunter and nester. These hobbyists often have a long-term regular (or two) who they see, but still enjoy the chase for that new and exciting experience with someone they have never met before. I fit into this group, as I think many of my fellow mongers do. I love the sensuality and familiarity of seeing the same woman every week because of the connection we have and the knowledge of what each other likes in the way of arousal and sexual play, but I also get excited about girls I'm seeing for the first time and all of the mystery and unknowns that go with those experiences.
Great breakdown! I'm definitely a hunter, tho there are a few ladies that I will repeat with. I love the excitement of a new liaison!
Anyone assuming that all women are nesters, I'm here to tell you that it just ain't so ☺️
-- Modified on 3/30/2023 7:56:40 AM
would be a hunter, it would be you. A few others have declared themselves through their posts over the years, but others here are still a mystery.
I guess that makes me a hunter/nester and not a hunter/gatherer. Thanks for the breakdown! I will be interested to see what the overall breakdown in responses is.
a loin-cloth, you are still a hunter-gatherer. Lol
There are probably several more categories. One, for example, would be what for lack of a better term, are the Looky-Lous. These are guys who lurk on this board, desperately wanting to get laid but simply can't pull the trigger. Or, if they can pull the trigger, the most they can do is be in the presence of their provider but not engage in sex. Typically, this would involve dinner or some other such social occasion. Under these circumstances the provider would literally be an escort. I am familiar with several such circumstances.
Personally, I don't understand these folks but they do exist.
I was talking about mongers who actually fuck providers, not lookie-loos, lurkers, lounge lizards or any other person looking for a non-sexual adventure. Let me be clear, of the hobbyists/mongers who are actually fucking providers on a regular basis, there are three types . . . . see my post above. If you want to break down the different types of sex-substitutes into categories, be my guest. Lol
We are in agreement about these other kinds of hobbyists, for lack of a better name. It's not something I understand either. There is no shortage of nice-looking women that will accompany a gentleman with decent appearance and manners to an upscale restaurant for a good meal and a bottle of wine. Why would anyone pay for her time in that circumstance?
The "other" types I referred to read TER and book TER providers. They just don't book them for sex. Simply because you're unfamiliar with these denizens of this site doesn't mean they don't exist.
As far as paying for a lady's time "for a good meal," I've had lots of good meals with providers and always made it clear that I'm happy to pay them for their meal. I just won't pay to watch them eat it. Just like I won't pay them to sleep.
I ALWAYS pay for a meal when inviting a woman to dine, but I don't give her the money for the meal, which seemed odd to me (but do whatever works for you), I just pick up the check at the restaurant.
As far as your other types, I would argue that the manner in which they approach finding a provider for non-sexual activities would still be classified within the three types I listed. They would still be "hunting" for someone new or "nesting" with the same lady over and over, or a combination of both. Since you cannot even classify them yourself, your first claim that my list was "incomplete" just seems like gratuitous trouble-making, and so we have come full circle. Lol
If so, you've succeeded. Where in the world did you get the idea I would "give her the money for the meal?" That would be idiotic.
As for your other comment, you are partially correct. I think most of these non-sex mongers are nesters because they tend to stick with one provider long term. I know of one who even introduced his provider to his family as his fiancé.
Weird, huh?
with quotation marks added. . . . . . " . . . .always made it clear that I'm happy to pay them for their meal." You said it, and normally I would agree it's idiotic, but I would also accept that it's a grammatical error that slipped by Conan. He watches everyone else, so he can't be watching you, too. Lol
I agree about the non-sexual customers. I think the reason they are nesters is because when you are doing something out of the norm, it's awkward to keep doing it the first time with new people. If they stick with one lady, she will figure out how to deal with whatever the weirdness is and make him happy. It's a win for all involved. . . . . . except for the part about meeting the family. No way to soften the POTENTIAL for disaster on that. Lol
But it was not, as you said, a grammatical error. I assume most people understood what I meant: that I was happy to pay for her meal, just not to watch her eat it.
He can always jerk off to a '10' is what he meant.
BITOD there was a lady I saw upwards of 50 times--for a while it was once a week and it lasted almost 3 years. Yet, even while I was seeing her, I occasionally visited other ladies as well.
Right now there's a lady I've seen roughly 25 times in ~ 14 months, including a couple of overnighters. Yet again, I also venture to new horizons in between playtimes with her.
I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm having a ball mixing it up.
Why...because she's there....Go figure
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
