TER General Board

If nominated, I will not run.
ohLordHaveMercy 5 Reviews 9248 reads
posted
1 / 84

Damn I heavily relied on TER for finding providers and seeing everything, I think maybe TER is more better than p411 only pro is that you can screened easily. Well the golden question here is what will happen to TER? Will reviews still be up? THe ad boards are gone, and only thing that I can see regionally is the new review sections smh

JakeFromStateFarm 123 reads
posted
3 / 84

and on the local discussion boards.
Get creative, girls!

imanalias 130 reads
posted
4 / 84

Next is profiles. I wish I could sort all reviews by country to determine what percentage is US based value. That and how many from the US are or were paying members, guys or ladies.

I’m thinking TER will be suffering seriously unless they can find an alternative

sweetsarah 200 reads
posted
5 / 84

It was a Creative Writer's Workshop that was protected by all known laws that we hold dear in this Country.

As a matter of fact, it was at times, just on an IP address with no actual domain name.  Go figure that chaotic genius:)

What is happening to the industry is horrible and will absolutely cause direct harm to so very many people, starting immediately. The loss of info sharing sites already has violent predators rising out of the cracks to seek their prey. Sadly, this will also carry onto the civilian population, as deviants are also losing their outlets. Mark my word.

Thousands of women are out of work without notice. The trickle down effect will be harsh on countless lives. A small percentage will have the means to retire out of SW and secure civilian jobs. The majority will not. Bet on it.

I've been in the industry for 36 years. I created the first free escort advertising site that ever existed and spent a few years hosting free message boards for all.  I am utterly shocked by the instant destruction we have witnessed today and will no doubt see in the days to come.  

I am more so extremely pissed at the complacency of the majority. If anyone believes that this mass censorship issued to the people is somehow "ok" ...(it's just those damned hookers, afterall").... well, I pray you think again. We are easy to dispose of from your mainstream and history teaches us to  actually expect to be void of equal rights.  

Our Commander in Chief hates the press much much more than he hates sexworkers. (clearly) The people as a whole are in grave danger for losing so much much more than the free exchange of information regarding the sex lives of adults.  

Just as pioneers invented the ability to have the free exchange of information about our adult sex lives, I have faith that sooner than later, another team of hero's will rise up and provide for the new "Creative Writer's Workshops".  For what it's prolly not worth, I'll do anything to support and work for that and my email address hasn't changed since hotmail was invented.  

I hope all the woman that are scared to death right now can know that things always work out. No matter how horrible and terrifying it may seem right now, you will absolutely find your way in your life, no matter your path. Trust me. You made it here. You will make it anywhere. And if you happen to have to stay, do know that we will find a way. We always have.  

And gentlemen, they need you more than ever now. Be kind.

No matter what....
Keep the panties on the floor,

Sincerely Sweet Sarah

 
p.s. FU cityvibe for absolutely planning that mass money grab rob from everyone that deserved it the least.

imanalias 35 reads
posted
6 / 84

I’m confused. Because this issue has been long discussed. Foot note, escort hosting websites, escort ad, reviewing websites, are now subject to federal prosecution and a felony offense.

Anyone facilitating in any activity that suggests sexual services for pay can be subject to this law and arrested as a felony offender.  

Does that make it clearer?

It’s not in law yet, will likely be fought in court for many reasons, but it has everyone running around with there hair on fire.

Posting to a discussion board is not subject to this law unless you suggest pay for services. If you have a hosted site that states specific sexual services for money that site may close your account or be closed by federal order if deemed they are facilitating sex services.

Ok, was that enough or do you need to know more? Some are preemptively changing things like TER, and Cityvibe. But removing the US ad boards without removing all the facilitating profile information and reviews was meaningless.

Crazy Diamond 12 Reviews 113 reads
posted
7 / 84

This may be a seismic shift, or not.  But, best to prepare for the worst...

BrooklynKallway See my TER Reviews 121 reads
posted
8 / 84
Jrdownunder69 4 Reviews 147 reads
posted
10 / 84

is what we are talking about. It has been around and will still be around. It has changed over time as it will adapt to this latest turn of events.  

As for any provider who has seen one of these hypocritical do what’s right for society, but not me a holes, now is the time to break your silence. If you have seen a legislator that voted for this crap, out them for who they really are.  

As for how to get around this? I’m sure legal eagles are already looking for loopholes and websites and providers are looking for different ways to operate.  

I myself have ideas how to navigate around the latest issue and working on getting it up and running.

SpiritofTay See my TER Reviews 137 reads
posted
11 / 84

New and innovative ways will be created to still implement the worlds oldest profession. It's the worlds oldest profession for a reason. We are just changing with the times, just like they did centuries ago.  

I have a few ideas...of course :)

Hpygolky 233 Reviews 101 reads
posted
13 / 84

It's be a subtle way of advertising...Just a picture with a attachment to their reviews or website..no,  "Hey Handsome, I'm available"...just pictures. The national photo board is still up, just isolate it to each city....duh.

SpiritofTay See my TER Reviews 125 reads
posted
14 / 84

it's still 'advertising'. The only thing that can happen is super anonymity and in basically 'sugar coating' what this really is. The words escort, provider, hooker, courtesan and all sites that relate to that (including this one) etc will have to disappear. Someone will have to create an underworld (like wearing a members only jacket lol) and strict rules and regulations by some kind of governing body will have to take over  to allow people in who are all good LOL.  

I vote GaG as President of the Underground Club of Ladies of the Night :)
And maybe Jake as VP (if he's nice ;)

(just trying to have fun and lighten everyone up and giggle)  

It'll be ok, kisses xox

-- Modified on 3/23/2018 12:48:15 PM

Jinx_The_Cat 33 Reviews 53 reads
posted
15 / 84

Congress recognizes that human trafficking is a bad thing.  It has also lumped in general prostitution in their "sense" as they call in the bill.  Section 230, The Communications Decency Act previously immunized a website operator from criminal and civil liability for the content on its website.  Congress felt that immunity was too broad and allowed unfettered advertising of prostitution and in some cases,  human trafficking.  

The CDA was based on the notion that a website that acted merely as a bulletin board has no control over the ads posted on it.  Think of the old community cork boards in the supermarket where Junior advertises his lawn mowing service.  Mrs. Jones hires Junior and Junior not only does a bad job of mowing her lawn, he also destroys her prize rose garden.  Should the super market be liable for Junior's bad work?  Of course not.  

But what if Junior advertises that he will kill somebody for you for the right price?  Mrs' Jones hires Junior to kill her husband and junior does that.  Should the supermarket be held liable?  Under FOSTA, as far as escort ads go, the answer is yes.

Congress fashioned its thinking on FOSTA by looking at the Mann Act of 1910 (18 USC 2421) which was the first federal anti-prostituion law that made it a crime to transport women or girls across state lines for "prostitution or other debauchery".  In fact FOSTA inserts immediately after the Mann Act a new code 2421A that states basically that any website that intends to "promote or facilitate the prostitution of another person" shall be subject to criminal and civil prosecution.  What that exactly means and how far a bulletin board service can go to simply allow escort ads will be subject to further litigation as the courts figure this all out.

Why is it bad?  Well ask the owners of CityVibe, BP and CL as well as TER admin about why they took down the escort ads.  Ask First Amendment advocates - this is clearly an attempt to chill speech - Prostitution is illegal, however there are no laws against a lady advertising dates on the internet.  She's not promoting the prostitution of another person as long as she does not advertise doubles.

The unintended consequences of this very bad law are many, but I believe the worst is that lower tier ladies, such as the BP and CL folks will be forced onto the street.  Maybe some of the higher tier girls as well.  What was once pretty low key thanks to the internet will turn into a blight.  Screening will be a challenge, because there is no open and obvious line of communication, so FOSTA makes it less safe for us all.  It makes it near impossible for LE to root out actual sex traffickers from the relatively benign and tolerable escort industry i.e. the GFE, which LE largely ignores unless it becomes a nuisance (escort overstaying her infall at the Marriott LAX, for example).  The costs of enforcement of the street trade will sky rocket.  The good old days of North Sepulveda Blvd are coming back.  (L.A. joke)

Hope this helps.

kenny_starr 76 Reviews 139 reads
posted
16 / 84

I don't know if this has been mentioned but TER domain name is registered through a US based company, Enom Inc, which is located in Washington state.  I hope TER admins or whomever consider moving the domain name to a more friendly locale.

JakeFromStateFarm 119 reads
posted
17 / 84

If elected, I will not serve.

Jrdownunder69 4 Reviews 128 reads
posted
18 / 84
Number 6 124 Reviews 121 reads
posted
19 / 84

I expect SESTA to be challenged in court and for plaintiffs to prevail.  

The only people who will benefit from SESTA are the politicians who can tell their constituents how tough on crime and trafficking they are.  

SESTA almost certainly will not eliminate human trafficking, if anything it will make the pimps easier to hide. Ask any major LEO how they feel about SESTA.  

SESTA definitely will not eliminate people from seeking sex or having sex. Politicians for millenia have tried and failed to legislate what goes on between men and women. They won't be succeeding here either.  

Finally, the much larger issue is the First Amendment. If the First Amendment shouldn't work for people we don't like, well...who do you think is next?

SpiritofTay See my TER Reviews 128 reads
posted
20 / 84

Lol no fun. Remember this is to lighten the mood, that's all silly xo

trex44 9 Reviews 117 reads
posted
21 / 84

Our rights under the Constitution and the Bill of Rights have been under attack for years, so this is another battle in that ongoing struggle. Our rights to privacy, free association and expression under the First Amendment and the attacks on our Second Amendment rights becoming even more intensive as we speak are all part of the back and forth battle with a common theme -- keep the masses under control.

So reach out to your providers, current and prospective, get pre-screened and maintain alternate means of communication (phone and email).

StuffedOpus 120 reads
posted
22 / 84

Curious how this affects those of us that provide website design and photography for the industry? Obviously we will lose business but will be legally in the crosshairs as well? Seems murky right now.

Thanks in advance.

citizen59 40 Reviews 115 reads
posted
23 / 84

Searching reviews  does not tell us who is coming to town and when, they only tell history.   By the time a review is posted the provider could have left town 3 months ago!

whetdick 24 Reviews 135 reads
posted
25 / 84

sex trafficking by definition is due to force, fraud, coercion.

Does the bill fuck over those who do it voluntarily too?

whetdick 24 Reviews 100 reads
posted
28 / 84
whetdick 24 Reviews 128 reads
posted
29 / 84

Why the fuck would they call it a sex trafficking act, and then lump every consenting voluntary participant into the mix?
Might as well call it Fight Online Prostitution Act, since it targets the entire trade.
.
Sex trafficking is done by force fraud or coercion.
Consenting adults do not fit the description.
.
I hope this shit gets challenged big time in courts.
If they can give gays rights, they should be able to fight for those who just want to get their dicks wet.

JadeBlueAfterglow 50 reads
posted
30 / 84

Thank you, Jinx.  That was excellent.
I hope this blows over... so I can get back to...

1angelinajones See my TER Reviews 96 reads
posted
31 / 84

I guess the battery industry will see an uptick by us randy ladies!

Bulletin:  "Seeking all of my ATF's:   please make sure you have
my Website in your hobby phone."

GaGambler 108 reads
posted
32 / 84

As long as part of the job description is running "quality control" on the women accepted.

 
Jake's too old and grumpy to be of much use in that regard anyhow, finding someone else to be "Vice" President should be a snap.

JakeFromStateFarm 136 reads
posted
34 / 84

Those were the words of Gen. William Tecumseh Sherman when asked if he would accept a draft to be President.  It is now known as a "Shermanesque" decline and was delivered firmly tongue-in-cheek.
Thanks for not getting it.

tantraerica See my TER Reviews 144 reads
posted
35 / 84

I have an email in my inbox from this company who says they are offshore and can host out ads as well as our web-sites. Im going to check them out this evening but in the meantime I thought Id post this for the rest of us to take a look at as an alternative.  

www.escort-ads.com

let me know what you all find out. I gotta go to the gym!!

Nutbar 107 reads
posted
36 / 84
Durhamdrew 19 Reviews 143 reads
posted
37 / 84

It's  for your own good ... BS if I have ever seen it!  Even Reddit.com has shut down discussion boards on sex work. DISCUSSION BOARDS!

Jinx_The_Cat 33 Reviews 147 reads
posted
38 / 84

FOSTA specifically exempts locations where prostitution is legal. Since P411 is in Canada and it is legal for escorts to advertise, it should not have any problems.  

I guess I should renew my subscription.  

It’s unclear if discrete escort self websites would fall under FOSTA, because the lady is not facilitating the prostitution “of another person”, only herself.  My sense is that it would not be a violation, but who wants to be the test case?

bustyally See my TER Reviews 92 reads
posted
39 / 84

You are so right! Traveling at this moment doesn't seem like a good idea either....for me anyway and I am itching to go again. Hope for things to get better.....soon!

imanalias 140 reads
posted
41 / 84

I’m very curious how they will be able to show proof or evidence that has no victims or charges to support there assisting trafficking or even prostitution.  

What will they need to present. Ok, maybe the case of, it looks like a duck, it walks like a duck, so it must be a duck, case closed guilty  

It’s the stupidest law, LE and DOJ agrees, bad law, bad law. But ok, let the courts handle it and see how far this goes.

Hey, if Congress is not in session, and POTUS doesn’t sign it before they return, they have to start over again.

bridgetbanks See my TER Reviews 100 reads
posted
42 / 84

post where the photo board is :)
this whole law passing is saying it wont take effect till 2019, so why is it starting now!?

imanalias 99 reads
posted
43 / 84

Panic is why. Just stay active in boards your visiting or local, better than only once a week

CountryBoyAtHeart 3 Reviews 148 reads
posted
44 / 84

I see irony in Trump and others who will cause this to become a law because they have probably used services of escorts in the past. Maybe they want to limit who can have access escorts (like themselves) by passing this law?

ginainthemorning See my TER Reviews 33 reads
posted
46 / 84

will likely be fought in court for many reasons by who?

Sadly very few providers or clients helped fund ESPLER v GASCON which cost over 70K before we made it to the 9th district court of appeals.  Coyote RI spends 2 years lobbying in NH for HB 1614 and Hb 287, yet the community doesn't seem to care enough to donate to our organizations to support the work we do fighting for our rights.

I hope the EFF will challenge it like they did with Prop 36 because if not we are screwed.

imanalias 29 reads
posted
47 / 84

Umm, possibly by DOJ, LE, EFF, ACLU, and others.  

DOJ thinks it’s wrong, many LEO think it isn’t good, it’s an affront to our being guilty without proper due process and evidence.  

Ok the comments I read, the bill I read, my ignorance in law or rights, I could be wrong.  

You better hope I’m not, because if I am, why bother posting your opinion to a fuck board that’s doomed. You are just as liable in supporting and promoting as everyone else is contributing comments opinions in a fuck board as all others are, feel better now???

Crazy Diamond 12 Reviews 128 reads
posted
48 / 84

As for this law not taking effect until 2019, that's false.  The bill states that it becomes effective immediately upon passage, i.e., when the President signs the bill.  Most likely, this will occur next week.

Crazy Diamond 12 Reviews 102 reads
posted
49 / 84

Congress has surely assigned an agent to receive veto messages while they are on vacation, thus allowing them to override by 2/3's majority when they return rather than reintroducing the legislation.   Doubtful it will happen with this, though I'd love to see the President fu*k with them on this, and make those bastards own this turkey.    

CamilleUK See my TER Reviews 128 reads
posted
50 / 84

.....everyone in the US who willingly participates in this industry. These are some crazy chaotic times. Even though I only accept a handful of requests a year, I’m really relieved I’m in the U.K...

Be safe and calm all please...panic creates bad decisions  

C xx

souls_harbor 93 reads
posted
51 / 84

The UK is proving that Orwell was an optimist.

CamilleUK See my TER Reviews 125 reads
posted
52 / 84

As far as I’m concerned, free speech should never allow hate speech. There have been way too many incidents on public transport in the U.K.  where people have been subject to such bullshit - I don’t have a problem with someone being banged up as a result....

imanalias 120 reads
posted
53 / 84

There are laws that can prosecute certain hate speech already. What SESTA is doing isn’t that, the are going to consider websites such as personals as facilitating sex trafficking without proof or evidence of a crime.

Next will be all speech someone finds offensive. Do you think that’s right? The rule protecting websites from prosecution for 3rd party information did not exempt those who could be found guilty of breaking the law unless the hosting website knowingly allowed it.

Do even discussion boards like this might be closed if they feel the hosting services knowingly are promoting or supporting an illegal activity based on assumption, no proof, no evidence, assumption. If it looks like a duck, it walks like a duck, it must be a duck, ur guilty without due process.

souls_harbor 105 reads
posted
54 / 84

There is no objective definition of "hate speech" so it is just what someone doesn't like.  I am sure you are happy to send people to prison for may years for saying things you don't like.  That is, in fact, an Orwellian society.  Remember that some people may not like what you say, or like your business of sex for money and are also happy to send you to prison for many years.

I could never be as tyrannical as you.   That's why i am a libertarian.  

cajunman 137 reads
posted
55 / 84

So YOU decide who is using hate-speech and want to physically hurt them?

All we need is the gubment telling us what to say now! LOL!!

It's foolish attitudes like this that got Trump elected.

That's why assholes like you will never have a say.

MP67 11 Reviews 118 reads
posted
56 / 84

I just now noticed there were no ad boards anymore. The life blood of the site, the women, and they cut them out.  

Fuck. Who is the fucking rocket scientist who came up with this idea?  

I see in the future other sites gaining ground...

Always respected P411. They do the references, the ads, and truthfully I had more 'likes' from ladies I've seen than here through P411.  

Just sayin'...... ;)

Valida 17 Reviews 105 reads
posted
57 / 84

That was false advertising, just like most bill "titles".  

The law explicitly refers to prostitution in general.  
The only way to check is to read the words.

WIMissScarlet See my TER Reviews 135 reads
posted
58 / 84

I can't walk the streets!!!!  AAAAHHHH!!!!  I live in a super small town in WI.  And there is snow on the ground here 7 months out of the year.  No one is going to pick me up on a street corner wearing blaze orange snow pants and a Packer jersey!!!!!  

imanalias 146 reads
posted
59 / 84

I’ll be there shortly driving that awesome fast snowmobile naked. Blaze orange right, isn’t that what everyone’s wearing, ok you better be naked too. 😃😘😃

EisleyValentine See my TER Reviews 124 reads
posted
60 / 84

I think it is going to make email lists the go to and push us into the dark web or something drastic. All i know is now is the time to network and cultivate those mailing lists.

IBDPhotography 134 reads
posted
61 / 84

Posted By: WIMissScarlet
Re: TER info!!!!  
 No one is going to pick me up on a street corner wearing blaze orange snow pants and a Packer jersey!!!!!  
You lost me at "Packer jersey!" :P

BritneyJaye See my TER Reviews 127 reads
posted
62 / 84

Websites are panicking because it makes  “ex post facto laws” legal. So even though it’s not in effect today...... if (which unfortunately looks likely) it does become the law of the land next year, they could still be convicted, even though it was legal when they were operating.

DAVEPHX 129 reads
posted
63 / 84

The new law reads: "(e) Affirmative Defense.--It shall be an affirmative defense to a charge of violating subsection (a), or subsection (b)(1) where the defendant proves, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the promotion or facilitation of prostitution is legal in the jurisdiction where the promotion or facilitation was targeted.''

NOTE WHERE TARGETED has to be legal.  So a Canadian or any foreign-owned site would be illegal if the ad was for a U.S. "prostitute"  We have criminal agreements and treaties with almost all other countries, although it may make it more complicated.  However, anyone with a U.S. presence could probably be served with a criminal complaint like any moderator or control person.   Just ask all the Russians that have been indicted!  Whether the foreign country would extradite is unknown but with most treaty's I believe would be compelled to by the Treaty.  I am not an expert on these foreign issues, however.

U.S. ISP's could also block access and of course, Facebook and Twitter have started doing so.

CamilleUK See my TER Reviews 108 reads
posted
64 / 84

I was responding to a comment about the U.K. - not SESTA

Posted By: imanalias
Re: I really feel for....
There are laws that can prosecute certain hate speech already. What SESTA is doing isn’t that, the are going to consider websites such as personals as facilitating sex trafficking without proof or evidence of a crime.  
   
 Next will be all speech someone finds offensive. Do you think that’s right? The rule protecting websites from prosecution for 3rd party information did not exempt those who could be found guilty of breaking the law unless the hosting website knowingly allowed it.  
   
 Do even discussion boards like this might be closed if they feel the hosting services knowingly are promoting or supporting an illegal activity based on assumption, no proof, no evidence, assumption. If it looks like a duck, it walks like a duck, it must be a duck, ur guilty without due process.

CamilleUK See my TER Reviews 114 reads
posted
65 / 84

Posted By: souls_harbor
Re: I really feel for....
There is no objective definition of "hate speech" .....  
Erm yes there is in the U.K. which is exactly why I responded as is. Its falls under the public order act of 1986 - specifically part 3. It has nothing to do with someone saying ‘something I don’t like’ - I suggest you do your homework before you jump in with comments that are factually incorrect.

souls_harbor 106 reads
posted
66 / 84

I don't think you understand what "objective" vs "subjective" means.  

"All Jews should report to the gas chambers" may have been a law, but it wasn't "objective."

Durhamdrew 19 Reviews 114 reads
posted
67 / 84

of the provider's web pages except for 411 info. some have nothing. I wish I knew this was coming.  
One provider I know has blocked all text messages to her. Good thing I still have some emails for ladies I see ...  

Now would be a good time to contact me with your contact info ladies.

Drumguy25 23 Reviews 113 reads
posted
68 / 84

That must have been at provider request.  All of my personal reviews still show links to all active web links. Blocked texts?  Did it scare her in to retirement?

Vivianna Love See my TER Reviews 140 reads
posted
69 / 84

https://gizmodo.com/senate-passes-sesta-controversial-anti-sex-trafficking-1823916411

CamilleUK See my TER Reviews 93 reads
posted
70 / 84

Now you’re just being obtuse
No-where will be there be an exhaustive list of what specific words/phrases are classed are racist however, that is not a get of jail free card for people to use - people who knowingly use derogatory phrases that are designed to inflict racially motivated and bigoted opinions pay the toll fee for it REGARDLESS of whether the law has an exhaustive list. It’s simple. Own what you say or shut the fuck yo. The law will not protect passive aggressive cowards...  
If you want a fence to sit on, fine. I couldn’t care less. But I’m not going to continue a back and forth with you about whether it is actually a fence or not...

Posted By: souls_harbor
Re: I really feel for....
I don't think you understand what "objective" vs "subjective" means.    
   
 "All Jews should report to the gas chambers" may have been a law, but it wasn't "objective."

girlfan1959 48 Reviews 28 reads
posted
71 / 84

Google, Facebook, etc. can't really control what gets put on, or shows up on, their sites. If they think this puts them in potential legal jeopardy, they might challenge this legislation as overly broad or on some other grounds.  I am sure that their legal team are already at work on this.

They wouldn't need donations to cover the legal fees.

I will look into your organizations. This is the first I heard about this.

blondiegirlxxxx See my TER Reviews 138 reads
posted
72 / 84

Yes FU to Cityvibe for stealing my money the day before they took down their site.

souls_harbor 96 reads
posted
73 / 84

Good lord woman, a guy was just convicted of a hate crime in the UK for making a comedy video of a dog doing a Nazi salute.

This IS nothing more than outlawing speech you don't like ... just like every banana republic tinpot dictator has done throughout history.   Not that long ago the church determined what you could say or not say.  Revolutions have been fought to win the freedom of speech -- including offensive speech, because speech is likely to be offensive to someone.  

A law that throws someone in prison for filming a dog doing a motion is evil incarnate.  Anyone who supports such a law is evil.  

PaytonGood26 See my TER Reviews 133 reads
posted
74 / 84

I just wanted to say that was an amazing message to everyone.
 obviously being a provider I appreciate your kind words it was nice to hear (as I sit here and try to  keep myself calm) and talking to others while continuing  to try to educate myself  is somewhat helpful it's just a scary thing because of the end of the day we really don't have any control over it or the outcome so it's the unknown and we just have to why it ride the wave.  
But reading your encouraging comments and seeing that we have your support and that you're in our corner, allow me to take a breath and feel a little better for that second. Hearing you say that it was going to be okay and just giving us the positive encouragement when you didn't even know me made me feel better ... I didn't know I needed to hear that but I did ..... so I appreciate you and your kind words  
Thank you so much for being Advocate and supporter for  all of us it's greatly appreciated and needed in this community (especially in timesLike This)
♡ Payton Good

vipbrooke92 See my TER Reviews 94 reads
posted
75 / 84
poor-little-rich-girl 107 reads
posted
76 / 84

Why would you think you smarter then TER lawyers? What are your credentials? Did you even read  new bill?

poor-little-rich-girl 134 reads
posted
77 / 84

According to new bill it does not help much

John_Laroche 110 reads
posted
78 / 84

I can see it now:

 
"Hey everyone, I'm going to be in LA April 1-6. Any recommendations on places to eat or fun things to do? Shoot me a PM."  

 
Would work for both providers and clients.

 
"Nothing worthwhile is...easy..." N. Sparks

numpty88 14 Reviews 119 reads
posted
79 / 84

That's an area of the USA where prostitution is legal (in certain counties) for which the FOSTA legislation carves out an exception.  (Unless I'm wrong, and there was no Nevada Ad board, but instead just Las Vegas and the rest of the state rolled up under the Other Cities ad board).

Although maybe the removal is a good thing as it highlights the destructive nature of censoring which results in restraint of trade.  If there's someone who can claim damages, they have standing, and that could be used to drive a court challenge by giving teeth to a claim.

Removing the Massage Ads board likewise seems a victim of censoring.  While there may be jurisdictions that require a license to do massage, that shouldn't be impacted by FOSTA.

Thinking aloud here: since the legal brothels in NV are staffed by independent contractors, many providers in other cities/states could advertise with an intent to eventually host in NV, and until then arrange meetings with potential clients to "gauge market interest" or to prescreen for compatibility in whatever city/state they happen to be visiting.

And no, I'm not an attorney.

brcforest 119 reads
posted
80 / 84
brcforest 104 reads
posted
81 / 84

That is a great solution. This should be enacted ASAP.

cks175 51 Reviews 127 reads
posted
82 / 84

Posted By: numpty88
Thinking aloud here: since the legal brothels in NV are staffed by independent contractors, many providers in other cities/states could advertise with an intent to eventually host in NV, and until then arrange meetings with potential clients to "gauge market interest" or to prescreen for compatibility in whatever city/state they happen to be visiting.
And that is exactly why they took down the Nevada ad board.  Advertising for non-legal activities falling under the law’s broad definition of sex trafficking, not exempt from FOSTA, would end up on that board.  

Life410 12 Reviews 145 reads
posted
83 / 84

Cloud Act was the nail in the coffin. All Internet  companies have to hand over data or the USA & countries in said "treaty" can take the data anytime they suspect a crime. No warrant in needed.

4th amendment has been destroyed.

ray8510 16 Reviews 106 reads
posted
84 / 84

I noticed several comments above about creating a photo-only board. I took a look at BP for the first time in a long time to see how they were dealing with this, and that seems to be their strategy for the moment. All of the ads are nothing but a phone number and a photo. Of course, the advertisers put text in the photos that kind of defeats the purpose.

Register Now!