Write Review
2,070,148 Total Reviews 3,670 New Reviews
18,236 Users Online

TER General Board

I suspect...
trex44 9 Reviews 153 reads
posted

...those who have monetized their OF content will simply migrate to a different platform, until THAT one attracts regulatory attention.  

Lather, rinse, repeat.

lester_prairie4321 reads

OnlyFans has announced new limits on sexually explicit content.  

ReplyQuoteReport
DrZoology150 reads

Oh. A lot of providers are going to be feeling this on their bottom lines. Some have been able to generate enough $$$ where they can cut back on offering escort services. I wonder if that means we will see an increase of providers returning to standard work, as quite a few have used this as a way to make money during COVID...?

A down side for us is that we could see a huge rate increase. On the flip side, the advantage could be is that we see a decrease in rates as more and more girls return to escorting and the market gets flooded with more choices.

ReplyQuoteReport
TurbayVeronica165 reads

content creators would move to different platforms. Its already happening and rates stay the same. :)  

We made OF, they would just go bankrupt like other venues that decided to change their methods, practices and TOS.  

There are other sites that everyone is moving to already.

ReplyQuoteReport
gnubie150 reads

These "platforms" are a dime-a-dozen. Many are licking their chops at the opportunity to fill the void. It's just a question of who can handle the logistics of streaming content without hiccups and outages. Nothing to see here.

ReplyQuoteReport
cks175153 reads

It’s still going to impact the models income streams. OnlyFans was the dominant player in that sector. As the girls migrate to other platforms, they will certainly shed some of their subscribers.

ReplyQuoteReport
coeur-de-lion164 reads

naked pictures of ourselves anymore, or does that just apply to escorts?  

ReplyQuoteReport
BigPapasan220 reads

Therefore, it would be illegal pornography...and anyone who sees the pictures would probably get a severe case of projectile vomiting.

ReplyQuoteReport
coeur-de-lion136 reads

is so obese he can't see his dick without a mirror.  Now, THAT'S obscene.   Lol

ReplyQuoteReport
trex44154 reads

...those who have monetized their OF content will simply migrate to a different platform, until THAT one attracts regulatory attention.  

Lather, rinse, repeat.

ReplyQuoteReport
TurbayVeronica155 reads

and not going anywhere. :)

ReplyQuoteReport
DT_lover145 reads

There is so much porn online for free.  Everything I would want to see and plenty more I don't want to see.  

Years ago I went to adult theatres and I ordered plenty of VHS porn back in the day.  Now I'm perfectly happy with what I find on just a few porn sites.  More [free] of my favorites than I can possibly see in my lifetime!!!

ReplyQuoteReport
Snotty181 reads

Not that it stopped me from logging in LOL...

Related Link: John McAfee: "You are immediately infected with KEYSTROKE LOGGING SOFTWARE"

ReplyQuoteReport
JawKnee36154 reads

I hear ya, DT. I’ve never been on OnlyFans so I feel nothing (maybe a slight internal giggle) about their decision to go bankrupt. Like cam sites and the whole Covid-eta virtual session, I just don’t get it. There’s endless amounts of free porn out there and providers only an email, text, or call away. I never got the whole IG girl worship either. All this GPS validation makes me laugh, but not as much as some GPS chick losing their lazy mealticket lifestyle and having to go work for a living. Call me mean, but tough shit. Talk about a ridiculous first-world problem no more tragic than say Starbucks running out of Oat Milk. They made money while they could, good for them. Unless another similar service takes OnlyFans’ place, too bad not sad good luck.

ReplyQuoteReport
gnubie155 reads

I had some subscriptions. They were really cheap like $5-15 range? Small price to pay to find out provider ads were photos of a different person, or they had no energy, etc. TER was dark at the time. The last attempt to subscribe set off alarms at my bank. I'm assuming OF was just trying to protect itself from fraudsters. But my bank didn't like what they were doing.

From what I read they're trying to get bigger investors. It's more about PR than regulatory issues. Maybe they have the pieces in place for the big payday. But I doubt it.

ReplyQuoteReport
gnubie166 reads

Different stories provide different reasons for the limits. Because they couldn't keep their story straight. I suppose some of it might be true.  

It would be like the Waffle House deciding to serve only lunch and dinner.  

I can't take credit for that line but I agree.

ReplyQuoteReport
alexissweet69133 reads

SMH

ReplyQuoteReport
labradamour173 reads

Selfishly, this might have lowered costs for live services.  But with Covid up and down,
this would have been devastating to many providers.

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!