Kinda rings true. Ladies... thoughts?

"the intensity of their orgasms also depended on how good-looking their man is."

Well, five out of six ain't too bad!  

See how good it is to have the carefully researched facts: I would have guessed that poor ugly sick nasty men who are boring conversationalists with really scrawny shoulders would have made better lovers.  Who would have guessed?.  That is research money well spent.
The research didn't --by any chance--tell us how to become good looking, rich etc did it?

Rich, strong, funny and broad-shouldered, but when it comes to attractive, you must play the hand you were dealt. However, much like the old saying about women, i.e.,  "a ten is a four with six million dollars," if a guy is rich enough, he can still get the best woman money can buy.

Depends on the skill of the woman rather than her looks. Looks are secondary, within reason. If she's fat or ugly, I just turn her around into doggy. Of course, when they're fat and/or ugly, its also a situation when I'm not paying.

The guys I found most attractive were short... some had little pot bellies which I found very cute

may as well just shoot myself now

that study for them or at least pointed them in the right direction. Lol.

Damn they're good!

there’s an evolutionary reason behind why women enjoy sex with fit, strong, funny guys — they should breed more “successful” kids.'

But I've never heard any woman say that they got great orgasms from a guy, simply because he was really "hot".  

Women SAY Rich, because they fake that shit for rich men.

To be fair to the researchers, they purport to show that in the aggregate there is a strong correlation btwn (respondent-reported) attractiveness and shoulder breadth of their partner and intensity and frequency of orgasm.  

"Rich","wealthy", "financially stable" are words that sound great on some kind of sugar daddy profile or arrangement website.  If a gentleman were to actually describe himself using any of those words, I would probably scratch my head and wonder why he chose to talk about money instead of what he enjoys doing, what he has done recently or what he hopes to accomplish.  The article states that women are in to rich, funny men with broad shoulders and I think that it's completely off base except in the conclusion where the authors' stance is softened by the claim that these so called desirable traits are all a matter of perspective.  
Some women are looking for guys who fulfill a checklist of characteristics, as are some gentlemen. However, I think that the way a person makes you FEEL is what ultimately determines the sex/ sex-life, two people will experience with one another.  I have no idea who is rich or poor when we meet.  I do not always share the same humor with others. I have no desire to compare one guy's shoulder width with that of someone else.... But I have great orgasms really often!  And that's because I know I am not perfect, a mind reader, or a porn star... I am just ME. I am cool with that. Guys who are just themselves are the hottest guys to have sex with.  
Why are genuine partners the hottest? Genuine guys are ok in their own skin (confidence), don't need be extra funny, wealthy, or buff to feel good about the man that they are.  They are ok with the possibility of no chemistry or total chemistry and are willing to let chemistry grow naturally, without reminding a woman of their finacial status, comedic ability or physical attributes. Genuine women don't conform to social demands and standards of beauty or desirability. People who are who they are, unapologetically, are the best lovers.  Self love is the foundation for being an amazing lover and the only characteristic that has ever made a difference in my experience