TER General Board
Science says water is wet (e)
Well, five out of six ain't too bad! 
The guys I found most attractive were short... some had little pot bellies which I found very cute
Kinda rings true. Ladies... thoughts?
"the intensity of their orgasms also depended on how good-looking their man is."
Which comes as a shock to no one.
Depends on the skill of the woman rather than her looks. Looks are secondary, within reason. If she's fat or ugly, I just turn her around into doggy. Of course, when they're fat and/or ugly, its also a situation when I'm not paying.
that study for them or at least pointed them in the right direction. Lol.
Well, five out of six ain't too bad!
See how good it is to have the carefully researched facts: I would have guessed that poor ugly sick nasty men who are boring conversationalists with really scrawny shoulders would have made better lovers. Who would have guessed?. That is research money well spent.
The research didn't --by any chance--tell us how to become good looking, rich etc did it?
Rich, strong, funny and broad-shouldered, but when it comes to attractive, you must play the hand you were dealt. However, much like the old saying about women, i.e., "a ten is a four with six million dollars," if a guy is rich enough, he can still get the best woman money can buy.
The guys I found most attractive were short... some had little pot bellies which I found very cute
The first had a lot of superficial charm. But he kind of looked like Kermit the Frog... he was so ugly, he was adorable. He was 14 years older than me (and hadn't aged well due to drug use)... 6 inches shorter, probably 10 pounds heavier. But girls loved him. I found out somewhere along the line that he had THREE girlfriends (I met one of them).
The second was similar in body type... 17 years older... with a cute face. Very smart, funny, and just extremely interesting and entertaining.
The third was straight from your article. Almost a foot taller than me, with broad shoulders and washboard abs. But I met him through a workout group, and was attracted to him for other reasons (he was kind and gentle).
My current flame is, like the others, shorter... not chubby, but not broad-shouldered, or athletic. He's what most women would refer to as 'cerebral.' Meaning, he couldn't lift the book he's reading, but could probably vomit out a Harvard-worthy interpretive survey of the work in its entire historical and cultural context.
But I've never heard any woman say that they got great orgasms from a guy, simply because he was really "hot".
In fact, I think of how many women - here and in real life - have said that sometimes, guys who are "hot" are not so much, in bed. I've experienced that. It's especially true if the guy perceives himself to be hot.
I can't remember the last time I looked at a hot stud, and thought 'I wanna hit that.' It's more emotional; I have to FEEL a certain way about a guy. (Women are generally more emotional, less visual when it comes to turn-ons... and that's supported not only from my own experience, but by the current research and writings on the subject).
I do think that money - not as in net worth, but as it's embodied in perceived power and the ability to nurture - play an important role in making a woman FEEL a certain way about a man (i.e. making her feel cared about and protected).
Humor is also a turn-on, as is intelligence.
However, I think humor, charm, kindness, solicitude, confidence, etc., all trump both money AND looks, so long as they guy is not physically unhealthy, unhygienic, or repulsive. (I realize that some women are shallow, and that's not true in all cases. But I think it's true much more often than not.
To be fair to the researchers, they purport to show that in the aggregate there is a strong correlation btwn (respondent-reported) attractiveness and shoulder breadth of their partner and intensity and frequency of orgasm.
They don't claim these factors are either necessary or sufficient. And they don't quantify attractiveness either. That is my big issue. They also don't break out the mechanism. Most women could lack your self awareness and conflate your factors into physical attractiveness. And they also don't claim that the more attractive the more and stronger orgasms. Your threshold statement as to looks could very well be what the researchers have found.
But it really does seem that women in the aggregate have more and stronger orgams with men they perceive as attractive.
may as well just shoot myself now
Damn they're good!
there’s an evolutionary reason behind why women enjoy sex with fit, strong, funny guys — they should breed more “successful” kids.'
Once again,
SEX to pop out KIDS
Women SAY Rich, because they fake that shit for rich men.
The rich man gets confident, and buys her even more shit.
Debunked.
"Rich","wealthy", "financially stable" are words that sound great on some kind of sugar daddy profile or arrangement website. If a gentleman were to actually describe himself using any of those words, I would probably scratch my head and wonder why he chose to talk about money instead of what he enjoys doing, what he has done recently or what he hopes to accomplish. The article states that women are in to rich, funny men with broad shoulders and I think that it's completely off base except in the conclusion where the authors' stance is softened by the claim that these so called desirable traits are all a matter of perspective.
Some women are looking for guys who fulfill a checklist of characteristics, as are some gentlemen. However, I think that the way a person makes you FEEL is what ultimately determines the sex/ sex-life, two people will experience with one another. I have no idea who is rich or poor when we meet. I do not always share the same humor with others. I have no desire to compare one guy's shoulder width with that of someone else.... But I have great orgasms really often! And that's because I know I am not perfect, a mind reader, or a porn star... I am just ME. I am cool with that. Guys who are just themselves are the hottest guys to have sex with.
Why are genuine partners the hottest? Genuine guys are ok in their own skin (confidence), don't need be extra funny, wealthy, or buff to feel good about the man that they are. They are ok with the possibility of no chemistry or total chemistry and are willing to let chemistry grow naturally, without reminding a woman of their finacial status, comedic ability or physical attributes. Genuine women don't conform to social demands and standards of beauty or desirability. People who are who they are, unapologetically, are the best lovers. Self love is the foundation for being an amazing lover and the only characteristic that has ever made a difference in my experience
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!