Searched the archive and didn't see this specifically discussed.

To me when somebody says rock-hard I think of rock-hard abs rock-hard biceps. Believe me, I've experienced rock-hard boobs and they feel like rock-hard biceps just located on the chest.

So when I guy classifies that a lady has rock-hard breasts can we agree on exactly what that means?

The thing that motivate me was a profile from a lady who I recently saw. See link. I don't mean to single her out but it's a great example of an abuse of the term. She was anything but rock-hard. Super nice is what I would have characterized but some may differ. But definitely not rock-hard as I understand it.

In my opinion I like my definition but I want to throw this out for discussion.

Ladies: Opinions always welcome but this is a guy issue since we're the ones who post the reviews.

-- Modified on 3/4/2006 12:34:22 PM

that the US office of Consumer Affairs establish an agency poste haste to determine criteria, inspect, and label each set of breasts belonging to any escort who has such a rating.

I volunteer my time and effort to be the first inspector. (A nominal fee will be involved.) Do I hear a second?

-- Modified on 3/4/2006 12:55:43 PM

When she lies on their back on the floor, and the breasts and nipples are firm and straight up, thats rock-hard breasts. If you can put a plank of wood across her chest and stand on it and the breasts and nipples are STILL strong and erect, now THAT'S Rock-Hard Breasts.
Just means they got a boob-job. -1 on the Doc's appearance rating.

someone who has breasts that defy gravity but are soft versus that of a lady who has breasts that feel like there are softballs inside?

I'm sorry brother but I can't agree with your analysis. What's more, there are a lot of ladies who meet the requirement you just described yet their profiles indicate everything from perky to super nice.

you get what you pay for. In and out of the hobby I've met great jobs and some that are horrible. Also, technology improves, cosmetic surgery is one of the fastest growing fields in the medical industry as far as break thrus and 'R & D'.

Personally, 'Rock Hard Boobs' in my experience, tend to be older silicone jobs that are too large and are hardening up. To me that is just as unattractive as an 'A' cup. Have also encountered enhanced boobs that you would never know were fake. They are also very expensive.

The best thing about implants IMHO, is that women that get them can't wait to show them off. I've been in several situations here in the OC (with my SO), that some gal has just got them and has to have us grab, fondle and thouroughly examine them.
This almost always leads to a more cofident woman and a divorce for the guy. Oh well, at least I got a squeeze...

NSF

-- Modified on 3/4/2006 1:48:59 PM

This appearance grading option REALLY chafes my balls.

  I have had the distinct pleasure of being with several ladies who had "Super Nice" looking bolt-on breasts but because of the prejudiced cartel of "naturalists" these poor gals received "Rock Hard" on their TER profiles.
"Rock Hard" is a tactile description.
Perky, Youthful, Super Nice or Droopy, are visual perceptions.

  I don’t give a hoot whether natural or man-made; I want to see CLEAVAGE!. The ROCK HARD denotation is pejorative and unfair, effectively slamming the gals who merely set out to balance their figure or possibly market too the aficionados of mammary magnificence.

-- Modified on 3/4/2006 7:09:25 PM

Maybe I'm in the minority, but I really prefer small breasts.  Very erotic!

The last time and i guess the only time i felt "rock hard" breast was in the late 80's....Needless to say i didnt go any further with this lady afterwards
I like em firm yet soft...