The provider, now delisted for unrelated reasons, used someone else's photos but they looked a lot like her. So, the photo wasn't real but was accurate. For the most part I have to believe that it's either operator error on the part of the first reviewer, or someone filed a problem report changing one of the two and the staff member didn't think about the logic flaw they created.
Just wondering. I don't understand reviews I've seen where the "Real Photo" option is set to No and the "Photo Accurate" is set to Yes. If it's not a real photo of the provider, how on earth can the photo be accurate? I can see it the other way around where it is a real photo of the provider but is not accurate (extremely photoshopped, very old pic, etc.).
The provider, now delisted for unrelated reasons, used someone else's photos but they looked a lot like her. So, the photo wasn't real but was accurate. For the most part I have to believe that it's either operator error on the part of the first reviewer, or someone filed a problem report changing one of the two and the staff member didn't think about the logic flaw they created.
I have seen in reviews, frequently for at least one oriental agency, the comment that the girl they saw is NOT the girl in the picture, but that she is a "fair representation", which I assume means equivalent build, face, and general hotness.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
