So this is more of a statement than a discussion but...

... and I know many who did.  All it took was any combination of 3 of the following in your profile:  kissing with tongue, BBBJ, really bi, and more than one guy. (I'm assuming a massage provider wouldn't offer Greek.)  I know a provider (a really great one IMO) who got many 10s even without BBBJ because she offered the other 3 (and had reviews that proved she actually will perform those services--that requirement popped up later, that there had to be proof that you actually did perform those services in some sessions).

I reviewed a girl that gave a solid nine performance, was one of the best petite spinners I have ever met, and gave the best CG ride I've had in a couple of years.  However, she only allowed LFK, no DFK, so I was limited to a score of 8 for performance because the only enhancement that applied was BBBJ.  I submitted as a 9 and was rebuked by the moderator.  Very few of the girls I see offer Anal, Duos, or More than one guy (which I have no interest in anyway, so I wouldn't do it even if it WAS available), so the only way they could get to a nine is with BBBJ and DFK, which many do.  I felt this rule made my review inconsistent with my prior reviews as far as the overall quality of the session.  

some massage girls offer.  Greek is sometimes available at the massage parlors that don't really offer massages that much.  OC is ground-central for massage parlors that are really just brothels.  The down side of using them is that they are heavily targeted by LE, so the chances of being involved in a bust are must higher than with a regular incall provider.  

The requirement isn't DFK... it's "kissing with tongue".  LIght French Kissing is by definition kissing with tongue. If you need to challenge a moderator's ruling, state your case in terms of TER's rules.  I've never had a challenge on one of my reviews turned down when I've appealed.  

-- Modified on 2/7/2017 1:38:31 PM

I gave in and changed it.  Its the first one I've ever had challenged based on a score I gave, so didn't know how much I should push, but if it happens again, I will keep trying.  Thanks for the tip.

I have to agree with you Goldie. The rule changes should equal the playing field somewhat? I can think of at least 3 reviews I submitted with a higher performance score than was permitted. I had to adjust it in order for it to be accepted.
  Why can't I give a 10 if in my mind I had a once in lifetime experience? Like others have said I have no interest or ability in some activities that are offered. That being the case and you can now only score on activities actually performed during the session a 9 is the max.
  Just glancing at you menu list on your profile I don't think back flips on the massage table and the National Anthem while on fire will be required for a 10? But I'd give you a 10 just to see it (assuming you don't lip sync)

... I just searched the entire TER database and found 3 non-TS massage providers who have reviews in the past year who claim to offer Greek even though "sex=No".  So they do exist... but not very many.

Nor for domination ladies who don't offer sexual services but are a 10 in their field.

I think the whole thing is kind of silly. But maybe it's just me...I personally do not care one bit what my "score" is. I only use this site if I need to verify someone or vice versa. The entire rating system is ridiculous. I read reviews and the ratings and most of the time, the 2 don't add up. I'll see one gal get high numbers, but when you read the words, it wasn't anything spectacular, but apparently if she's really young and skinny with big tits, that's all it takes...and then you get the women who have mediocre numbers, yet the review states the guy had a great time, he just chose to score her lower...why? who knows?! Does it matter?! NO! Every single person will experience something completely different with each provider and every provider provides a different experience for each client. Which is how it should be...who wants a cookie cutter non-personalized experience?  What I do with BillyBob might be nothing like what I do with JimBob. And how they treat me from the initial email to how he responds to my touch, will dictate that. We also all know that reviews on this site have not always been legitimate. I know of one retired well-known provider who ALWAYS manipulated her score. And sometimes, though it's hard to believe...the reviews aren't exactly accurate according to what really transpired...but hey, let's all keep bitching and moaning about stuff that really doesn't matter...at least to those of us who know our worth without being scored. Instead, how about we be less judgemental, and understand that this is all about having fun and being safe.  I love the idea of just having a checklist...details are irrelevant. Unless we providers can respond to our reviews by reviewing our clients in return, then it's jut stupid. So please, be kind when you're judging us and be thankful it doesn't go both ways. Ok...I'm done with my rant! haha!

well it is if TER admin doesn't update/correct provider profiles!  

I never "offered" or gave any kind of extras due to personal preferences when I was new. Otherwise it's a BJ massage (to me not the same as "massage only" meaning HJ ending or self service ending).

that's why they're upset.
Everyone wants a perfect score. My auto mechanic, my broker, my escort. Every kid needs a 4.0 or he/she won't get in their 1st choice college.
If I don't give it, I'm AFRAID of the repercussions.  

Would you repeat?  
PASS = yes  
FAIL = no

You have in your profile Really Bi and More than one Guy.  Unless you suddenly became Really Bi when you started offering FS, that's an extra point that would have been available to you under the old rules.  And if you were open to massaging more than one guy at a time, that's two points. And kissing with tongue gets to a possible 10, all with no BJ.

When your neighbor loses his job, it's a recession.  When you lose yours, it's a depression.

Haha good enough for me

1. Take a provider who got consistent 10s - let's say three or more.  Now she's getting consistent 9s.

Your argument would be valid if anal was actually the cutoff, but it isn't.

Once the maximum score was established (7, 8, 9 or 10), reviewers would rate performance at that level. As I have said many times, I have had some FANTASTIC 7-out-of-7s.  Based on Profile claims (I don't avail myself of everything claimed to be offered), I have also had some 7-out-of-10s (and worse      
 
The written reviews are most telling. As many have noted, there are and will be many, "I would have given her a 10, if allowed."  7/7 = 100% performance; 7/10 = 70% performance may be more informative.

she was only eligible if she OFFERED these as a service. If she was Really Bi, love Anal, gave BBBJ, and did MFM in her private life only, it wouldn't count toward scoring her massage performance. When she went FS and OFFERED these, it elevated her potential to 10s. Now with the new rules, each individual client would need to experience 3 or more "extras" in order to rate the performance a 10.

Read my posts again. I said she'd need to actually OFFER kissing with tongue, really bi, and more than one guy to SOMEONE, as a provider of course. FS has nothing to do with it. Under the old rules, if you offer those services, anyone can give up to a 10.  Under the new rules, the services must be performed in the session being reviewed.

Don't believe me do a search. I complained about it for years. But the new system is worse. I don't share my paid dates with other dudes, I don't do ass, I don't review sessions with my wife (conflict of intrest), and I rarely do doubles anymore. So no matter what I can't give a ten no matter how happy I am and no matter how willing she was of letting fucking her in her ass while eating out a woman while some guy fucks her pussy.  

If I'm understanding the new review policy correctly, which is that a lady can only earn the extra point(s) if she actually performs the qualifying service(s) with a client during a session, providers and clients could game the new policy by pretending that anal occurred during a session when it actually didn't. Kissing with tongue and BBBJ will qualify a lady to receive a 9, and if the client happens to mention that anal supposedly occurred, the lady can now receive a 10.  

Of course it is. For anybody not interested in threesoms, they can't give a ten unless they did anal in the session, no matter how great they thought she was. As he said, a lot of guys aren't looking for anal.  

As Fearghas pointed out, the other two criteria are so rarely in play that they effectively have no impact on ratings. How many reviews are for two providers, 1%?  And I have probably read a thousand reviews at this point and seen one gangbang.

... a lot of her clients only see 10/10 providers. And she thinks that a 9, because she doesn't take it in the 3 hole, puts a tinge of doubt in their thinking.  

This new scoring changes the subjective to much more objective. The people complaining about it probably also think they give 110 percent effort. Which of course does not exist!

Severely a first world problem when you work a few hours a week to pull in over 100k a year. I'm a solid 7/7 massage provider with an excellent group of new ladies and gentlemen along with my long term Gem Gen's who have been with me for years.  My schedule is always booked and I never worry about clients, bookings or money/ finances.  I think the 10/10 is just to keep stroking the ego.  This job isn't that difficult if you are attractive and perform you will easily be booked. Nobody's Bonner is going away over a 9, entice them with your sparkling personality. Just note there is just a tiny bit of sarcasm here.

I just looked at your menu and scores and WTH you are a full service and then some provider!

-- Modified on 2/7/2017 4:24:14 PM

providers some who have been around for a long time recall her various postings and rants talking mess about gfe providers.
voila she is now one of us like someone said one of her better threADs but still a threAD.
she is not going to answer about being underage when her reviews started here cause then she would have to admit her profile is incorrect.Plus that does not look good when posting a threAD oh I mean post on the GB.

Smart move!

-- Modified on 2/8/2017 6:25:21 AM

This is so funny HUGS everyone. Maybe I can post as "mature" and then it would be a bait n switch LOL LOL

"somebody" sent in a problem report and got it changed by Admin.

At least it matches up with being of legal age now when she started.

At least now it's her accurate age range instead of early 20's, which she had posted.  

First it went from 21-25 to 31-35, early this morning, then maybe an hour ago, it changed to 26-30.

She didn't like someone reporting her and listing her likely real age, so she problem reported herself to bring it to 26-30. TER had it right when they changed it, I would bet.

It's easy to prove she is not 21-25 as the math does not add up, but unless someone had proof she was over 31, all they could do would be to get her bumped up to the next level 26-30.  

Granted, she hasn't always been the most likeable poster who has ever graced this site, but it's one thing to call her a liar about her age. Something I am absolutely positive she (and hundreds, if not thousands of other hookers) has done here. It's quite another to accuse her of being an underage hooker in 08.  

I didn't even know of any new policies. I suppose if I stopped having sex and paid attention.....  

If you sit around and wait for others to stand up for the things YOU want, you're never going to get it. You can't really expect people who aren't massage providers to argue your case. Sure, it would be nice, but most likely isn't going to happen.

-- Modified on 2/8/2017 10:51:58 PM